@M.C, I'm afraid the edges aren't cut very smoothly. This thread contains guidelines for what we're looking for in our cuts in terms of dimensions, snow, collars, face orientation etc. and video tutorials for each element.
If you want to give it another go yourself, I would recommend using remove.bg, which is a free online tool which removes the background to an excellent standard, for free and almost instantly.
Here's a couple of videos on how to use it, one when combined with Photoshop and another using photopea.com, which is a free online app so close to Photoshop that it has the same shortcuts, layout and icons.
If you don't have Photoshop, photopea.com is the tool I would recommend to use to tweak the draft cut produced by remove.bg. It's more powerful and versatile than GIMP and other similar tools.
@M.C, I'm afraid the edges aren't cut very smoothly. This thread contains guidelines for what we're looking for in our cuts in terms of dimensions, snow, collars, face orientation etc. and video tutorials for each element.
If you want to give it another go yourself, I would recommend using remove.bg, which is a free online tool which removes the background to an excellent standard, for free and almost instantly.
Here's a couple of videos on how to use it, one when combined with Photoshop and another using photopea.com, which is a free online app so close to Photoshop that it has the same shortcuts, layout and icons.
If you don't have Photoshop, photopea.com is the tool I would recommend to use to tweak the draft cut produced by remove.bg. It's more powerful and versatile than GIMP and other similar tools.
Totally agree - sorry, rushed it between other tasks. Don't worry - I know my way around Photoshop; I will re-do this one and do it cleanly.
I've re-submitted based on a different source. The original fidelity was quite low - this was about as clean as I could cut it. I have set it to Pending so it can be reviewed by another staff member before being accepted/rejected accordingly.
I've re-submitted based on a different source. The original fidelity was quite low - this was about as clean as I could cut it. I have set it to Pending so it can be reviewed by another staff member before being accepted/rejected accordingly.
I reckon you could get a better cut through julk's source tbph.
.