Search
This page refers to an older game Football Manager 2018. View China PR in all games.
China PR Newgen Rating
Poor
Newgens are the new players that the game generates and join the club on Youth Intake Day. The Newgens produced by China PR will be Poor
China PR is a nation found in Football Manager 2018. China PR is also known as Team Dragon in FM2018. People from China PR are known as "Chinese" in FM 2018.
This page describes China PR in FM18 if you are looking for a FM18 Transfer Update? Check out our official sortitoutsi Football Manager Transfer Update to get an updated Football Manager 2018 database with all the latest squads, updated transfers and promotions and relegations.
| Name | Total Teams | Avg Budget | Avg Age | Avg Training | Avg Youth | Avg Academy | Avg Rep | Avg Att | Avg Rating | Avg Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chinese Super League | 16 | £1b | 8.75 | 7.31 | 6.94 | 93 | 24428 | 61.51 | 65.76 | |
|
China Jia League | 16 | £342m | 5.69 | 4.73 | 4.44 | 67 | 6906 | 54.49 | 59.24 | |
|
Chinese National Second Division Northern Group | 12 | £25m | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 40 | 2339 | 42.59 | 49.59 | |
|
Chinese National Second Division Southern Group | 12 | £31m | 3.75 | 2.86 | 2.57 | 40 | 2713 | 45.63 | 52.58 | |
|
Chinese National University League | 31 | £1m | 2 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 13 | 326 | 2.37 | 2.57 | |
|
Chinese Non-League Clubs | 30 | £4m | 3.52 | 5.25 | 4.63 | 14 | 1900 | 1.34 | 1.74 | |
|
Chinese Champions League | 324 | £445k | 2.78 | 3.06 | 2.91 | 12 | 434 | 12.01 | 13.03 | |
|
Chinese Amateur - Guangxi Lower Division | 9 | 11 | 317 | 4.5 | 4.68 | |||||
|
Chinese Amateur - Guangdong Provincial League | 7 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 286 | 1.89 | 2.11 | ||
|
Chinese Amateur - Guangxi Super League | 15 | £876k | 2.67 | 11 | 404 | 2.79 | 3.05 | |||
|
Chinese Amateur - Hunan Super League | 8 | 8 | 100 | 9.45 | 10.19 | |||||
|
Chinese Amateur - Qilu Super League | 5 | 10 | 150 | 14.86 | 16.52 |
| Name | Balance | Budget | Wage | Avg Age | Avg Att | Training | Newgens | Yth Recruitment | Rating | Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Guangzhou Hengda | £2b | £701m | £175m | 44,883 | Good | Adequate | Limited | 66 | 70 | |
|
Hebei Huaxia Xingfu | £2b | £1b | £88m | 18,469 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 66 | 69 | |
|
Shandong Luneng | £2b | £876m | £9m | 31,685 | Great | Good | Limited | 64 | 69 | |
|
Shanghai Shanggang | £2b | £2b | 28,012 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 64 | 69 | ||
|
Shanghai Shenhua | £2b | £53m | 22,690 | Good | Below Average | Limited | 64 | 68 | ||
|
Beijing Guo'an | £2b | £438m | 38,140 | Good | Adequate | Limited | 63 | 68 | ||
|
Tianjin Quanjian | £2b | £701m | £22m | 12,165 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 63 | 68 | |
|
Jiangsu Suning | £2b | £1b | 38,992 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 63 | 68 | ||
|
Guangzhou Fuli | £2b | £175m | 9,831 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 62 | 65 | ||
|
Beijing Renhe | £701m | £263m | £44m | 4,542 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 60 | 64 | |
|
Dalian Yifang | £788m | £61m | 10,806 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 60 | 64 | ||
|
Tianjin TEDA | £263m | £438m | 12,525 | Adequate | Adequate | Limited | 60 | 66 | ||
|
Henan Jianye | £701m | £307m | 17,282 | Below Average | Below Average | Limited | 60 | 64 | ||
|
Chongqing Lifan | £701m | £175m | 36,178 | Below Average | Poor | Limited | 60 | 63 | ||
|
Changchun Yatai | £613m | £88m | 15,202 | Adequate | Adequate | Limited | 59 | 63 | ||
|
Guizhou Zhicheng | £438m | £175m | 23,000 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 59 | 62 | ||
|
Liaoning Hongyun | £88m | £35m | 22,488 | Below Average | Average | Limited | 58 | 61 | ||
|
Wuhan Zhuo'er | £701m | £175m | 4,853 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 57 | 61 | ||
|
Shenzhen FC | £438m | £175m | £18m | 10,152 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 57 | 61 | |
|
Zhejiang Lücheng | £438m | £61m | 11,723 | Average | Average | Limited | 57 | 62 | ||
|
Shijiazhuang Yongchang | £613m | £175m | £44m | 22,523 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 57 | 60 | |
|
Shanghai Shenxin | £438m | £88m | 3,816 | Below Average | Poor | Limited | 56 | 60 | ||
|
Beijing Beikong | £701m | £44m | 3,463 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 55 | 60 | ||
|
Qingdao Huanghai | £175m | £26m | 6,992 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 55 | 59 | ||
|
Yanbian Fude | £219m | £61m | 19,305 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 55 | 59 | ||
|
Zhejiang Yiteng | £263m | £3m | 2,351 | Basic | Adequate | Limited | 54 | 60 | ||
|
Xinjiang Tianshan Xuebao | £3m | £876k | 2,615 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 53 | 58 | ||
|
Meizhou Kejia | £88m | £18m | 6,450 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 53 | 59 | ||
|
Meixian Tiehan | £44m | 4,870 | Poor | Basic | Limited | 52 | 59 | |||
|
Baoding Rongda | £44m | £18m | £9m | 1,876 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 51 | 56 |