@mons you've missed this one.

@Baja Please don't use an image enlarger, you've already been asked not to do so. The originals at 500x500 are more than big enough for a 250x250 cut

You've must be really bored to go around my requests and reject them.This is more than personal issue.There's a bunch of c**p requests,but no,these are the problem.

-At first there's no criterium to reject missing request,as long they are missing and image is cutable.

-At second you can't reject an improvement request as long it will provide an improvement on current image.

So,you don't have any reasonable fact to do this.Yes,you can provide original source and that's it. All these will provide an improvement no matter what as final cuts,simple as that..Only reason for enlarging images is to keep tiny hair details.

It's not that deep, source requests where an image enlarger has been used always get rejected.

Since when?! I haven't been for a year around here,only from time to time with some requests,but that was not the case.All my requests are completaly by the rules,so you might not like them but it's only your problem.You can't reject them just because of it.You are really “hard” guy for a person who wanted Milan Bajić in db so bad,just because you've made his cut (even it's not correct guy at last).So,I know the rules,and I completaly respect them,and as long it's like that,give me a break.Do you see anything good in this?usefull? You need a lot more work and cuts to achive what I have been achived in this community.