Dejan Kulusevski - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

43295814

Timeline

1560x2340
This image is part of a pack: Juventus
Pending by Rykjev on 26 Nov 2020 00:10:44
In Progress by Pradita eka on 07 Dec 2020 07:50:56
Pending by Pradita eka on 07 Dec 2020 07:54:06
In Progress by rigsdigs on 20 Dec 2020 12:11:10
Completed by mons on 31 Dec 2020 15:57:34
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Juventus/Zebre Minipack
Pending by rigsdigs on 20 Dec 2020 12:13:09
Completed by mons on 20 Dec 2020 12:25:17
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Juventus/Zebre Minipack Tweaked
Pending by rigsdigs on 20 Dec 2020 14:24:01
Completed by mons on 20 Dec 2020 14:32:08
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Juventus/Zebre Minipack 3.0
Pending by rigsdigs on 21 Dec 2020 20:31:23
Completed by krissmed on 21 Dec 2020 20:34:23
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Sweden - UEFA Euro 2020
Pending by HRiddick on 11 Jun 2021 18:17:37
Completed by Brockie19 on 11 Jun 2021 19:52:57
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Juventus
Pending by HRiddick on 28 Aug 2021 22:35:18
Completed by mons on 29 Aug 2021 06:31:09
1323x2048
mons
17 years ago
3 minutes ago
85,494

This is a great source but please keep in mind the below from the guidelines to making requests @Castroman 

 

  • If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.

This player has had two virtually identical cuts in the last few months already; there's very little to be gained by having yet another one 😕

Castroman
9 years ago
3 days ago
335
Premium
By mons 06 February 2022 - 16:35 PM UTC 

This is a great source but please keep in mind the below from the guidelines to making requests @Castroman 

 

  • If you are requesting an image for a person who already has a cut in the megapack, please make sure that the source you are uploading will produce an improvement. We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative. Please keep in mind that we have a limited number of cutters and hundreds of thousands of images in the megapack, so we can't update them every few months or so.

This player has had two virtually identical cuts in the last few months already; there's very little to be gained by having yet another one 😕

 

It makes sense!! 🙂

250x250
Completed by mons on 26 Aug 2022 20:00:16
mons
17 years ago
3 minutes ago
85,494

@Jack Hodder, please take the time to read the guidelines carefully before uploading any more images.

 

If you have multiple images to upload, please do so as a pack instead of individually, and save the both us the time needed to upload and download respectively.

 

Secondly, most of these aren't really improvements. As the guidelines state,

 

We don't consider a newer image to be automatically an improvement since we also take quality of source and cut into consideration. If the current megapack cut is recent and similar in look (check on his/her timeline before uploading an image), there is little added value in cutting another source for the person. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.

Most of these images you've cut are, I suspect, from the Premier League website, whose source images aren't the largest. It's hardly your fault this is the case, but cutting them will in most cases not produce a better image than the current megapack cut, so it's not worth bothering.

 

Thirdly, we require all cuts to have a collar and to be cropped within 2-3 pixels of the chin. When a collar is lower down than that, this is the technique you should use to nudge it upwards:

 

1000x1000
This image is part of a pack: Tottenham
Pending by Belajariman on 09 Sep 2022 03:10:48
In Progress by Belajariman on 09 Sep 2022 03:11:06
Completed by Belajariman on 18 Sep 2022 17:38:33
250x250
This image is a response to #2360542 This image is part of a pack: Tottenham
Pending by Belajariman on 18 Sep 2022 17:38:58
Completed by mons on 18 Sep 2022 17:42:33
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Tottenham Hotspur
Completed by HRiddick on 19 Sep 2022 22:08:24
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Tottenham Hotspur
Completed by HRiddick on 18 Oct 2023 21:08:13