Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

Our Cut-Out Faces Megapack is the biggest collection of Football Manager Player Faces available. All players are available in the default cut-out style. When you download our Cut-Out Faces Megapack, you'll receive over 450,000 player faces to spice up your copy of Football Manager.

  • 463,302
  • 2024.07 - Released on 15 Apr 2024
Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

aless
16 years ago
3 years ago
47
Thank for 5.03 back to FM !
paradosso
17 years ago
2 weeks ago
25
Just scouted this player, he doesnt really look as "papa agyemang" from ghana..

http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/8855/agyemang.png
mons
17 years ago
45 minutes ago
86,070
http://www.clevescene.com/binary/3e89/1349813923-thats-racist.gif

It was pointed out to me already prior to 5.03 but I forgot to change it

I've found a (poor) source to replace it and posted the request already.
hjs
16 years ago
2 years ago
1,643
Premium
By aless | Permalink | On 20 January 2013 - 16:04 PM
Thank for 5.03 back to FM !



welcome back aless
Andreas35
14 years ago
1 month ago
1,024
I'm trying to upload a graphic pack but i can't, it says ''The Download Desc BBCode field is required''
What i can do to upload???
Sorry if i am not in the right topic
NiceLad
17 years ago
6 days ago
18,611
By Andreas35 | Permalink | On 05 February 2013 - 11:13 AM
I'm trying to upload a graphic pack but i can't, it says ''The Download Desc BBCode field is required''
What i can do to upload???
Sorry if i am not in the right topic

Put a full stop in the "Installation Instructions" box and that should sort it
Baja
14 years ago
50 minutes ago
35,838
Here is the one mistake made by me...
In last update there is a guy with 62097261,and his name is Zlatko Krmpotic,but that's wrong man,with the same name
Now I'll post both guys with real UID,so please fix it in next update
Zlatko Krmpotic 5789997
http://www.dodaj.rs/f/1y/uy/20gJzEKs/5789997.png
Zlatko Krmpotic (Junior) 62097261
http://www.dodaj.rs/f/1k/Fs/2hGm6XLI/62097261.png
garyh
16 years ago
4 years ago
322
Just a quick id check please. His the players id below correct?
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5519/250054368.png
250054368
Side Splitting Pass
14 years ago
2 years ago
29,534
Premium
By garyh | Permalink | On 10 February 2013 - 10:30 AM
Just a quick id check please. His the players id below correct?
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5519/250054368.png
250054368


No it should be
91119623 Rene Klingenburg
garyh
16 years ago
4 years ago
322
Patres10
17 years ago
2 weeks ago
104
I downloaded the whole megapack 5.03, but with the Megapack Picture Search Tool I still find players from previous megapack versions (4.01, 4.00, 3.01, etc) that are not included in the last one. How is it possible?
mons
17 years ago
45 minutes ago
86,070
Examples please?
Tuckius
13 years ago
4 days ago
265
When will be a new update?
mons
17 years ago
45 minutes ago
86,070
Tuckius
13 years ago
4 days ago
265
By mons | Permalink | On 13 February 2013 - 00:17 AM
Soon.

this week?
Baja
14 years ago
50 minutes ago
35,838
Since we didn't have search tool option before,and we had trust on requesters,some of them posted wrong MP,and worse cut replaced better,put it in next 5.05 update here is the old\better cut
Beast72
17 years ago
3 years ago
0
any idea who this guy is? found him in my megapack with blank ID

http://i191.photobucket.com/albums/z19/titmansbucket/240c164d92.png
Baja
14 years ago
50 minutes ago
35,838
He already have same cut-out with his UID,so you can safely delete that one,without ID
mons
17 years ago
45 minutes ago
86,070
5.04 is now out, as some of you may have already noticed. It's somewhat smaller than usual, and contains 3013 new and improved images.
kfnielsen
17 years ago
8 hours ago
2,630
Premium
great Work as allways u guyz
many thx
O'Leary's Trainee
15 years ago
7 years ago
2,636
Great work!

I have a couple of questions, though.

1.) This is kinda minor, but the image count on the download page states 123.989 images, while my folder contains 123.904 images. I know I haven't missed anything since I've not used this pack until this year and have immediately downloaded 5.00 and the subsequent update packs. Perhaps the rest are just leftover images from 4.00 and such - but just a little curious. It's just 85 images difference, so I hardly believe I'll ever notice the difference.

2.) Some of the images I've cut for the pack have also been slightly adjusted, it appears. And, they've become worse. Is this something you do? For example is the cut below. It has been brightened, and so to the point that it's become overexposed. I noticed this on about 4-5 of the cuts I've submitted.

My Cut: http://s9.postimage.org/lva7jbatn/114999.png

MP Cut: http://sortitoutsi.net/cutoutfaces/180/179818/114999.png
maxtod77
15 years ago
7 hours ago
26,476
Premium
my folder contains 123.935 images

???? ????
aless
16 years ago
3 years ago
47
Great ! Thank !
timtim11
17 years ago
5 days ago
323
Premium
I have 124,052
Fat Penlon
11 years ago
4 years ago
323
By mons | Permalink | On 13 February 2013 - 19:12 PM
5.04 is now out, as some of you may have already noticed. It's somewhat smaller than usual, and contains 3013 new and improved images.


Hi mate, any chance you have the original SI cut-outs for Hibernian (1575)? I asked for several players to be changed back as I thought they were replaced with older/poorer images. Any chance you could PM me a few?

5108444, 5207943, 61007243 & 5112040

Those were the ones I wanted to change.


I presumed that you would be the best person to ask, I tried deleting the image/config info like a different poster said, but it just made the images blank.

Cheers.
mons
17 years ago
45 minutes ago
86,070
By O | Permalink | On 14 February 2013 - 11:41 AM
Great work!

I have a couple of questions, though.

1.) This is kinda minor, but the image count on the download page states 123.989 images, while my folder contains 123.904 images. I know I haven't missed anything since I've not used this pack until this year and have immediately downloaded 5.00 and the subsequent update packs. Perhaps the rest are just leftover images from 4.00 and such - but just a little curious. It's just 85 images difference, so I hardly believe I'll ever notice the difference.

2.) Some of the images I've cut for the pack have also been slightly adjusted, it appears. And, they've become worse. Is this something you do? For example is the cut below. It has been brightened, and so to the point that it's become overexposed. I noticed this on about 4-5 of the cuts I've submitted.

My Cut: http://s9.postimage.org/lva7jbatn/114999.png

MP Cut: http://sortitoutsi.net/cutoutfaces/180/179818/114999.png

Re point 1: you are correct, those images will probably be leftover duplicate or incorrectly-assigned images from previous versions.

Re point 2: I re-colour images which I think could be improved by doing so. It's far from an exact science, and it depends on the display settings which one has on his setup. In your example, I think your cut's hue was a bit too much on the red side, though I think that my modifications don't really make the image that much better. If there's any other images which you think merit reviewing, by all means give me their UIDs and I'll have another look willingly






By FatPenlon | Permalink | On 14 February 2013 - 18:50 PM
Hi mate, any chance you have the original SI cut-outs for Hibernian (1575)? I asked for several players to be changed back as I thought they were replaced with older/poorer images. Any chance you could PM me a few?

5108444, 5207943, 61007243 & 5112040

Those were the ones I wanted to change.


I presumed that you would be the best person to ask, I tried deleting the image/config info like a different poster said, but it just made the images blank.

Cheers.

You can easily acquire them yourself using SI's resource archiver tool
garyh
16 years ago
4 years ago
322
Done corrected
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/1696/114999alt.png
114999
Patres10
17 years ago
2 weeks ago
104
By mons | Permalink | On 12 February 2013 - 19:12 PM
Examples please?

I should have the whole uncorrected pack somewhere... I take a look at my addons and post the results today
Patres10
17 years ago
2 weeks ago
104
Example that I think that I remember:

Sergio Leòn picture in version 4.10 but not in 5.03
http://sortitoutsi.net/cutoutfaces/153/152610/67140149.png67140149
O'Leary's Trainee
15 years ago
7 years ago
2,636
By mons | Permalink | On 14 February 2013 - 22:11 PM
Re point 1: you are correct, those images will probably be leftover duplicate or incorrectly-assigned images from previous versions.

Re point 2: I re-colour images which I think could be improved by doing so. It's far from an exact science, and it depends on the display settings which one has on his setup. In your example, I think your cut's hue was a bit too much on the red side, though I think that my modifications don't really make the image that much better. If there's any other images which you think merit reviewing, by all means give me their UIDs and I'll have another look willingly


Thanks. It's not really that big of a deal. I think this was the image that I reacted most strongly to, as I felt it made it worse. But, as you say - different display settings will change things radically. I would agree that my original cut didn't have the best coloring (though I'd claim it was too much on the blue side). The other cuts were just brightened a tad too much for my settings anyway, but I'm not going to bother as (like you said) it's very subjective.

May I recommend, though - that you go a little easy on the brightening in the future?


PS. I wanted to ask - have you had continuous problems with my images saving as .jpeg? I know I've been a lazy boy and haven't gotten an account at any other hosting site, but I'm also very comfortable using the one I have.


By garyh | Permalink | On 15 February 2013 - 07:17 AM
Done corrected
http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/1696/114999alt.png
114999


Now, that's an improvement

You'll need to Login to comment