chairman and director of football

I was just wondering how much impact these have on the game. For example: if you were managing newcastle, could you have a scenario where mike ashley sells your most valuable player but only gives a fraction of the profit to the club to spend and kinnear not buying anyone and just bringiing loans in?

Or say you had a chairman like abramovich, would he keep pumping money into the club for a dof who likes to splash out on marquee signings?

Just thought it could make for an interesting challenge!

Also wondering of their relationship with each other and the manager has a bearing on hpw things work. If you had a chairman for man utd but his favourite club was man city for example. Or say you had something like just as an example beckham chairman of man u with scholes as dof and gary neville as manager? Would that work better as theyre all buddies at their favourite club?

Yeah, your finances screen it tells you how much of a percentage you get from transfer fees. Certain chairman will happily accept bids whereas others will leave it up to you.

As for relationships that only really comes into effect when buying/selling players, if the manager has a good relationship with you he is more likely to sell a player to you.

Interesting skacel. Thats kind of what im hoping for. Im intrigued to see the difference between working for a chairman who is driven pudely by making money with no passion for the club (like Ashley) and someonse who loves the club and wants to see it succeed. I think it will be interesting to have clubs greatest strikers coaching the next generation and passing on their passion for the club.

So iguess if i'm going to achieve this my question would be, what qualities/tendencies would i give each relevant individual. Obviously their loyalty and favourite club/people will be hugely important in getting the right chemistry and atmosphere at the club. Any suggestions?