AndreaSSL1900 - Comments

Rgarding Lazio, now have a main sponsor Binance

New logo Spinea – ID 43269863

New logo Fiumicino 1926 - ID 43065112

It Is right. I have no idea too about It, we must wait and see what will happen. 

Same question for new team Ancona-Matelica, a fusion between Anconitana and Matelica. In fact they have taken the place of Matelica in the italian third tier and even in the logo they remember in all aspects the old Ancona Calcio logo, from the next season they will back to the old name Ancona. They have already declared it

https://www.facebook.com/anconamatelicacalcio/

New logo Barano Calcio (ASD added instead of AS) - ID 43066278 

The old society since last year is ASD Real Giulianova ID 43315321, the heir of Giulianova Calcio with ID 1133 and now changed in Giulianova Calcio again. In the attachment you can see the logo they used until now 

“La società è stata rifondata nel 2021 con la nuova denominazione, e si pone come continuità sportiva dello storico Giulianova Calcio 1924”

“The club was refounded in 2021 with the new name, and is the sporting continuity of the historic Giulianova Calcio 1924”. Wikipedia page 

New logo Vasco Da Gama - ID 339

New logo Peruvian first division - ID 5290551 / 215852 / 215853 / 215854

Peruvian second division - ID 5290553

New logo and new sponsorship for Kosovo Superliga - ID 89056580

Mate Remember to add the same amount of logos also in the new 2-3 packs you're doing, so we have a big ammount of work yet done for FM 22 when It will comes out. Don't worry for the update delay

New logo Casoria Calcio - ID 43048780

New logo Pallavicino - ID 43076681

New logo Montespaccato - ID 43126683

New logo Gonnosfanadiga - ID 43386193

New logo Gonnosfanadiga - ID 43386193

New logo Montespaccato - ID 43126683

You anticipated me. I wanted to put it on

Thanks 🙂

I can give an example regarding the national cup of my country, Italy. Is not wrong give the logo with or without the sponsor, because for the duration of the competition italian FA uses sponsorless version but for the final they add a sponsor and every year is different so can't be considered a mistake

On Onefootball the ecuadorian league is called in this way and not knowing that the league have changed sponsorship, i thought it was the current denomination. They have outdated infos, my bad

Gillingham Town - ID 8325168

Gillingham (small change) - ID 656

New logo ecuadorian Ligapro serie A - ID 80000566

I've made my point too. I don't really care to be mentioned like researcher, is respectful towards the person who provided them, but for me it is much more important and gives me much more satisfaction to see that the logos I have provided are included in the pack. It would piss me off if they weren't put in the pack after the time I wasted looking for them, not if you don't quote me. This is my point of view

@Derek 

 

I'm not agree to giving credit to someone other about the pictures he posted in another pack if i use the same photo for my pack, for the reasons i've explained.  if we all did this, we should give credits to the sites where we get them rather than to people because each of us finds them around the web being free to publish the images and not making them a commercial use since we use them to create the packs of logos and play privately without earning anything on it.

Why i have to give credit to someone, if i can find the same image by my own? you don't know if i stolen it from you and i dont have to apologize with you if i want reech or exceed the amount of your logopack using the same logos. I could use the same image than you uses, yes it could happen but the same image is avaible for everyone and sometimes is the only avaible in good quality.

The images of the logos can be found everywhere, so everyone can steal them and feel free to use them however they want. If someone copies and steals an image from me, I cannot accuse him because I was the first to do the same thing from a site, precisely because they are available to everyone and everyone can use them and no one violates any rights. If 20 people post the photo of the manchester united logo in 20 different packs, who can accuse who of stealing it if the team is the same for everyone? Who must give credits to who?

Why on earth you have to claiming copyrights violation on something when you for first don't earn anything on it? because you lost your time searching it? in my opinion is a stupid thing. No one paid you anyway, so shut up and enjoy the result of your contribute and let that other people can do the same thing and help others creators even copying them from you, we play the same game and we want all improve the game for free and have fun

Exactly i'm trying to help. The research for italian logos from 1 to 7th tiers is all mine and i think all logopack MUST HAVE the same ammount of logos to be must complete as possible and don't care where and it doesn't matter where the photos come from because anyone can find them on the internet in the official sites of the teams or specialized sites, so anyone is free to post the same photos wherever they want if they think they are useful to complete a pack that he uses rather than another. If i want use Steel Logos pack instead of Metallic Logos and i I want this package to reach or exceed the number of logos present in the Metallic Logos, because I cannot do it and I cannot provide the same logos, which I repeat everyone can find? You can find them, i can find them, everyone can find them.
In my opinion it is ridiculous that a pack of logos has far fewer logos than another and it is right to use any way you see fit to provide logos to complete a pack, even "stealing" them which is what you accuse me of and which in reality is not as the images of the logos can be found anywhere on the internet and you cannot know where I am getting them. Maybe we all get them from the same sites who knows.
 

The images of the logos can be found everywhere, so everyone can steal them and feel free to use them however they want. If someone copies and steals an image from me, I cannot accuse him because I was the first to do the same thing from a site, precisely because they are available to everyone and everyone can use them and no one violates any rights. If 20 people post the photo of the manchester united logo in 20 different packages, who can accuse who of stealing it if the team is the same for everyone?

Uruguay updates 

 

Correct logo of C Guaraní - ID 106071

New logo Moldovan Cup - ID 59007608

New logo Moldovan Super Cup - ID 59125821

Correct logo CSCT Dacia Buiucani - ID 57114034 / 1300807

Missing logo Lion Of Judah FC - ID 2000047791

New logo Stade Montois Football - ID 2033

New logo Dinan Lehon Football Club - ID 34003166 / 2000003929

New logo Landivisiau Football Club - ID 34013418

New logo Bourges Foot - ID 50041792 / 50082841

New logo Avant-Garde Caennaise - ID 50046031

New logo Football Club Briolet - ID 50055417 

New logo Chateaulin Football Club - ID 50077872

New logo  AS Gerardmer Football - ID 85111297

Romanian clubs update