Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Reckon the absolute roof is going to blow off this soon.

Asafa Powell and Tyson Gay tested positive today. In the past few weeks 4 Jamaicans have tested positive. Obviously you don't want to cast aspersions but if they're doping then it brings the question marks about Bolt too.

My question is though, does anyone actually care as much as people think we do? Don't we want to see athletes competing faster and harder than ever before and seeing as it is impossible to stop doping do we need to rethink the strategy?
Obtuse
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,338
Let them dope as far as I am concerned. Test them after of course and fix a penalty on them in terms of time and money but if this carries on there will be nobody left.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Separate Olympics for doped up athletes is the only solution
Blaze
17 years ago
1 year ago
248
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 14 July 2013 - 23:20 PM
Separate Olympics for doped up athletes is the only solution


Until last year, would've been the only chance for Dwayne Chambers to enter the olympics
Franck
17 years ago
1 month ago
4,255
Some people will always try to cheat, especially in situations where money is involved. Contrary to what most people think it is actually a good sign that many are being caught, it means the testing procedures are working and that the governing body for that sport is taking action to combat doping. It's sports like football where the documented cases of doping are pretty much non-existent that you need to be worried about.

By Slashman X | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 00:20 AM
Separate Olympics for doped up athletes is the only solution

Except that event would have no credibility, encouraging people to keep cheating in the "real" Olympics.
Obtuse
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,338
Drop running from the Olympics and bring back wrestling.
Franck
17 years ago
1 month ago
4,255
By Obtuse | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 05:21 AM
Drop running from the Olympics and bring back wrestling.

The 100 m sprint is the marquee event of the summer games, the chance of it being dropped is non-existent.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Franck | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 02:31 AM
Some people will always try to cheat, especially in situations where money is involved. Contrary to what most people think it is actually a good sign that many are being caught, it means the testing procedures are working and that the governing body for that sport is taking action to combat doping. It's sports like football where the documented cases of doping are pretty much non-existent that you need to be worried about.

Except that event would have no credibility, encouraging people to keep cheating in the "real" Olympics.


I guess it would allow athletes a choice though, you'd have more stringent drugs testing and you could bring in lifetime bans (although why they aren't a thing I don't know).

Plus I kind of what to see a man run a 2 sec 100m before he spontaneously combusts at the finish line.

Oh and people are only getting caught because they fuck up. The most recent cases where people have spoken candidly about it blame the fact they were sold mislabeled drugs. 6 of the 8 fastest men to run the 100m have tested positively, they're all doping and it's incredibly naive to think that anyone that is beating the dopers is doing so naturally.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
Bolt is the only guy I'd assume was clean. He seems for of a freak of nature than an athlete.

I am a bit scared of the Fuentes thing invading football, and Spain and Barcelona's domination being explained by doping. Although, I wouldn't think doping would help Xavi too much.
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
There's a lot of doping stuff around at the moment from all angles - as well as this there's cycling, the Fuentes thing in Spain and the Australians had a doping scandal earlier this year.
Franck
17 years ago
1 month ago
4,255
By Ninja | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 10:50 AM
I guess it would allow athletes a choice though, you'd have more stringent drugs testing and you could bring in lifetime bans (although why they aren't a thing I don't know).


We can't give athletes a choice because most of the substances used for doping are illegal. It would also create a strange situation where it'd be difficult to distinguish whether it's athletes or medical companies that are competing.

And athletics already has lifetime bans, you get banned for life upon your second offence, iirc.
As for the stringency of testing, it already is about as stringent it could be in athletics, all the athletes need to be available for testing by WADA every day of the year and surprise tests are common for the top athletes.

6 of the 8 fastest men to run the 100m have tested positively, they're all doping and it's incredibly naive to think that anyone that is beating the dopers is doing so naturally.

I have to disagree here, the dopers dope because they know they wouldn't be able to compete with their superior non-doping athletes otherwise.

What is naïve though is to think that out of roughly 2500 professional footballers just in the big 5 leagues there would only be one or two players ever other year doping.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Thought I'd post this about the 100m as well.

ine men in history have run the 100m in less than 9.8 seconds.
The first, 25 years ago this summer, was Ben Johnson, running 9.79 to win the 1988 Olympic final in Seoul.
We know how that one turned out: for a quarter of a century he was sport’s most famous shamed doper, until Lance Armstrong gave him a run for his money.
It took more than a decade for the 9.8 barrier to be broken again. Here, in order, are the men to have done it (with the relevant notes beside their best times):
- 9.79 – Maurice Greene – Has never tested positive. He has admitted paying Mexican discus thrower Angel Guillermo Heredia $10,000 – a payment the Mexican claims was for performance-enhancing drugs, but the American maintains was innocent, for ‘stuff’ for his training group.
- 9.79 – Justin Gatlin – The 2004 Olympic champion was banned in 2001 for two years for testing positive for amphetamines. And then again in 2006 for four years for ‘testosterone or its precursor’. Back again, and running fast. Won bronze in London last summer.
- 9.78 – Tim Montgomery – Admitted to testosterone and human growth hormone use – his once-world record mark has been stripped from the history books.
- 9.78 – Nesta Carter – 27-year-old Jamaican who has claimed gold in the 4x100m relay at the past two Olympics. A training partner of Asafa Powell.
- 9.72 – Asafa Powell – Confirmed that he failed a doping test on Sunday, but denies knowingly cheating.
- 9.69 – Tyson Gay – Confirmed that he failed a doping test on Sunday: “I made a mistake. I don’t have a sabotage story, I don’t have lies… I basically put my trust in someone and I was let down.”
- 9.69 – Yohan Blake – Tested positive for 4-Methyl-2-hexanamine in the 2009 World Championships – the substance is not on the World Anti-Doping Agency’s banned list, but the test led to his withdrawal from the event by the Jaimaican Amateur Athletic Association and he was among four to be given a three-month ban by his federation.
- 9.58 – Usain Bolt
Usain Bolt is clean. We cannot stress that enough. He has never tested positive, he has never been accused of taking stimulants. He has an unblemished record. His performances have brought huge joy around the world, and taken the breath away.
And yet, what as fans we are being asked to believe is that Usain Bolt is more than a tenth of a second quicker than all of his rivals, the majority of whom are tainted in some way or another by doping.



http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/world-of-sport/usain-bolt-tainted-association-athletics-doping-scandal-074417614.html

So 2 of 9 100m times under 10 sec are 'clean' and one of them (Carter) appears to be suspect due to association
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
I thought Carter was confirmed yesterday with Powell?
Franck
17 years ago
1 month ago
4,255
Usain Bolt has an entirely different physical build compared to virtually every other top sprinter in history, it is entirely plausible that his achievements are "natural".

Anyway, the list Ninja posted is misleading as both Gatlin and Blake posted their personal bests years after their doping accusations.
DB
15 years ago
7 years ago
322
There was some huge write up on Bolt doping I read ages ago after being linked to it on another forum. The same poster went on to state that doping is pretty much rife in all sports. Laughed it off at the time but it is getting very hard to doubt lately.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Franck | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 15:08 PM
Usain Bolt has an entirely different physical build compared to virtually every other top sprinter in history, it is entirely plausible that his achievements are "natural".

Anyway, the list Ninja posted is misleading as both Gatlin and Blake posted their personal bests years after their doping accusations.

What makes you think they stopped doping and haven't just been cleverer about it?
DB
15 years ago
7 years ago
322
By Ninja | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 15:14 PM
What makes you think they stopped doping and haven't just been cleverer about it?

Yeah this. The majority of intellects in the field pretty much always state how the testers are always one step behind.
Franck
17 years ago
1 month ago
4,255
By Ninja | Permalink | On 15 July 2013 - 16:14 PM
What makes you think they stopped doping and haven't just been cleverer about it?

The fact that Gatlin was suspended for 4 years and would be banned for life if caught again makes it reasonable to expect him not to be doping. He would have to be tremendously stupid to risk literally pissing away his opportunity to clear his name as well as ruining all of his post-sprinting career opportunities by doping again, never mind the fact that as a well-known former doper he will be under increased scrutiny from WADA, his fellow competitors, the media and the public.
Phoenix Arrow
15 years ago
1 year ago
825
So if a chap were to dope, how much time would that shave off? How fast would Tyson Gay run for example sans drugs?
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
Its impossible to tell, drugs work differently for each person so theres no way to know how much faster someone can go.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
I've been on steroids a few times this year for dermatology related stuff and I've found it's more recovery it aided. You just don't get the same recovery naturally and it makes a huge, huge difference. Cycling will always have suspicions floating about due to the history involved, but until it's proved someones doping it's a bit harsh to be throwing accusations around.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 days ago
5,082
Premium
I can understand the need for some questioning with regards to Froome and impressive performances in this post-Armstrong era, but at the same time I feel bad for a guy who's spent months training incredibly hard to get to the level he has. I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to dedicate hundreds of hours to perfect your work, only to be accused of cheating because of how good you've gotten. It's sad, but ultimately understandable.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Italian police say former 100m world-record holder Asafa Powell, Jamaican team-mate Sherone Simpson and their trainer Christopher Xuereb have been placed under investigation for allegedly violating Italy's doping laws.

The move comes a day after Italian police confiscated unknown substances in a raid on the hotel where the trio were staying in the north-eastern town of Lignano Sabbiadoro after the athletes tested positive for banned stimulants.

You'll need to Login to comment