Home
Blog
Careers
Forums
Downloads
FM24 Real Name Fix
FM23 Real Name Fix
FM23 New Leagues
FM24 Tactics
FM24 Data Update
FM Database
FM Guides
FM Shortlists
FM24 Wonderkids
FM24 Free Players
FM24 Bargains
FM24 Players to avoid
FM24 Club Budgets
FM24 Club Facilities
Graphics
Installation Guides
Records
Prediction League
Fantasy Football
Search
Ninja
Asafa Powell and Tyson Gay tested positive today. In the past few weeks 4 Jamaicans have tested positive. Obviously you don't want to cast aspersions but if they're doping then it brings the question marks about Bolt too.
My question is though, does anyone actually care as much as people think we do? Don't we want to see athletes competing faster and harder than ever before and seeing as it is impossible to stop doping do we need to rethink the strategy?
Obtuse
Slashman X
Blaze
Until last year, would've been the only chance for Dwayne Chambers to enter the olympics
Franck
Except that event would have no credibility, encouraging people to keep cheating in the "real" Olympics.
Obtuse
Franck
The 100 m sprint is the marquee event of the summer games, the chance of it being dropped is non-existent.
Ninja
I guess it would allow athletes a choice though, you'd have more stringent drugs testing and you could bring in lifetime bans (although why they aren't a thing I don't know).
Plus I kind of what to see a man run a 2 sec 100m before he spontaneously combusts at the finish line.
Oh and people are only getting caught because they fuck up. The most recent cases where people have spoken candidly about it blame the fact they were sold mislabeled drugs. 6 of the 8 fastest men to run the 100m have tested positively, they're all doping and it's incredibly naive to think that anyone that is beating the dopers is doing so naturally.
Shola
I am a bit scared of the Fuentes thing invading football, and Spain and Barcelona's domination being explained by doping. Although, I wouldn't think doping would help Xavi too much.
Number 1
Franck
We can't give athletes a choice because most of the substances used for doping are illegal. It would also create a strange situation where it'd be difficult to distinguish whether it's athletes or medical companies that are competing.
And athletics already has lifetime bans, you get banned for life upon your second offence, iirc.
As for the stringency of testing, it already is about as stringent it could be in athletics, all the athletes need to be available for testing by WADA every day of the year and surprise tests are common for the top athletes.
I have to disagree here, the dopers dope because they know they wouldn't be able to compete with their superior non-doping athletes otherwise.
What is naïve though is to think that out of roughly 2500 professional footballers just in the big 5 leagues there would only be one or two players ever other year doping.
Ninja
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/world-of-sport/usain-bolt-tainted-association-athletics-doping-scandal-074417614.html
So 2 of 9 100m times under 10 sec are 'clean' and one of them (Carter) appears to be suspect due to association
Slashman X
Franck
Anyway, the list Ninja posted is misleading as both Gatlin and Blake posted their personal bests years after their doping accusations.
DB
Ninja
What makes you think they stopped doping and haven't just been cleverer about it?
DB
Yeah this. The majority of intellects in the field pretty much always state how the testers are always one step behind.
Franck
The fact that Gatlin was suspended for 4 years and would be banned for life if caught again makes it reasonable to expect him not to be doping. He would have to be tremendously stupid to risk literally pissing away his opportunity to clear his name as well as ruining all of his post-sprinting career opportunities by doping again, never mind the fact that as a well-known former doper he will be under increased scrutiny from WADA, his fellow competitors, the media and the public.
Phoenix Arrow
King Luis
K3V0
Telegram Sam
Slashman X