Search
This page refers to an older game FM17. View China PR in all games.
China PR Newgen Rating
Poor
Newgens are the new players that the game generates and join the club on Youth Intake Day. The Newgens produced by China PR will be Poor
China PR is a nation found in Football Manager 2017. People from China PR are known as "Chinese" in FM 2017.
This page describes China PR in FM17 if you are looking for a FM17 Transfer Update? Check out our official sortitoutsi Football Manager Transfer Update to get an updated Football Manager 2017 database with all the latest squads, updated transfers and promotions and relegations.
| Name | Balance | Budget | Wage | Avg Age | Avg Att | Training | Newgens | Yth Recruitment | Rating | Potential | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Guangzhou Hengda | £2b | £2b | £43m | 44,883 | Good | Adequate | Limited | 67 | 70 | |
|
Shanghai Shenhua | £2b | £52m | 22,690 | Good | Below Average | Limited | 65 | 67 | ||
|
Hebei Huaxia Xingfu | £2b | £1b | £87m | 18,469 | Average | Below Average | Limited | 64 | 68 | |
|
Shandong Luneng | £2b | £868m | £9m | 18,932 | Great | Average | Limited | 64 | 69 | |
|
Shanghai Shanggang | £2b | £695m | 28,012 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 63 | 68 | ||
|
Jiangsu Suning | £2b | £1b | 38,992 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 63 | 67 | ||
|
Beijing Guo'an | £2b | £434m | 38,140 | Good | Adequate | Limited | 63 | 67 | ||
|
Guangzhou Fuli | £2b | £174m | 9,831 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 62 | 66 | ||
|
Tianjin TEDA | £260m | £434m | 22,081 | Adequate | Adequate | Limited | 62 | 67 | ||
|
Tianjin Quanjian | £2b | £695m | £22m | 12,165 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 60 | 65 | |
|
Changchun Yatai | £608m | £87m | 15,202 | Adequate | Adequate | Limited | 59 | 63 | ||
|
Hangzhou Lücheng | £434m | £61m | 11,723 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 59 | 64 | ||
|
Beijing Renhe | £695m | £260m | £43m | 4,542 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 59 | 64 | |
|
Henan Jianye | £695m | £87m | 17,282 | Below Average | Below Average | Limited | 59 | 63 | ||
|
Yanbian Fude | £608m | £61m | 19,305 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 59 | 62 | ||
|
Chongqing Lifan | £695m | £174m | 36,178 | Below Average | Poor | Limited | 59 | 63 | ||
|
Liaoning Hongyun | £87m | £35m | 22,488 | Below Average | Average | Limited | 59 | 63 | ||
|
Shijiazhuang Yongchang | £608m | £174m | £43m | 22,523 | Below Average | Basic | Limited | 58 | 63 | |
|
Shenzhen FC | £174m | £26m | £17m | 10,152 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 58 | 62 | |
|
Beijing Beikong | £695m | £43m | 3,463 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 57 | 61 | ||
|
Dalian Yifang | £781m | £61m | 10,806 | Average | Adequate | Limited | 56 | 61 | ||
|
Zhejiang Yiteng | £260m | £3m | 2,351 | Basic | Adequate | Limited | 56 | 60 | ||
|
Guizhou Zhicheng | £260m | £868k | 11,089 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 55 | 59 | ||
|
Qingdao Huanghai | £174m | £26m | 6,992 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 55 | 60 | ||
|
Wuhan Zhuo'er | £260m | £17m | 4,853 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 55 | 60 | ||
|
Shanghai Shenxin | £434m | £26m | 3,816 | Below Average | Poor | Limited | 54 | 60 | ||
|
Xinjiang Tianshan Xuebao | £3m | £868k | 2,615 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 53 | 58 | ||
|
Dalian Chaoyue | £9 | 4,350 | Basic | Basic | Limited | 53 | 59 | |||
|
Meizhou Kejia | £87m | £17m | 6,450 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 52 | 58 | ||
|
Baoding Rongda | £17m | £4m | £4m | 1,876 | Basic | Poor | Limited | 52 | 57 |