Baresi6 - Comments

It has better success rate vs big teams. Allowed Milan to finished top of champions league group containing liverpool, overturned first leg deficit to beat Real Madrid comprehensively in 2nd round, and only lost narrowly to PSG (I think we would've won with more quality in the finishing department). No noticeable success in league games vs other big teams in Serie A. 

PS. Once aspect that I'll give credit to this tactic is that you score a lot but also keep lots of clean sheets. Most of the other ones that result in scoring goals also seem to have you concede a ton of goals. so in that sense, it is definitely a positive alternative. 

That's what I had to do, my friend. I used an underdog tactic to finish above liverpool in the champions league group, and also knock out R.Madrid in the 2nd round (this tactic failed to make an impressive vs those two sides). Even as things fell apart in the final 5 games, I did try and change tactics and even mentality but I've noticed that in fm23, once things begin to unravel, they truly unravel. It is like a momentum you can't overturn. 

Like all the other tactics for fm23, it promised a lot for the majority of the season but then it suffered the customary collapse. I was in total control of the league with Milan, but then lost the Coppa Italia final to Juventus, and didn't win a single of the last 4 matches. Ended up losing the title to Inter by one point despite pretty much leading for the entire campaign. All of these tactics seem to have the same impact. Start great, but there is always the uncontrollable collapse. The highlight of the season was not losing to Inter across league, cup and super cup. But I had to use another tactic to make it past Real Madrid in Europe.