Stephen Amankona - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
13210170Timeline
@Simon Lukas, the source you are providing with your requests are becoming less and less useful every time.
That`s a coincidence. I apologize deeply for not finding a better quality pic.
But I found a missing player, is that worth nothing?
Where`s the award for that?
The recommended way of searching is 99% exatcly the same way I use to do it!
And if that still doesn't help, then it's better not to post such small and poor images as they're not worth cutting.
But some other one from the community can jump in (and did jump right in) to help out.
Or do I misunderstand the meaning of a community?
Don`t we all want these empty faces to be filled?
No offense my mate mons, but that has to be said once.
I use to play footballmanager games for over 25 years now, I have a wide knowledge of football.
I I had the grafix skills, I`d do it myself - but I can not do it.
But I try to help otherwise.
@Side Splitting Pass
Thank you for finding a better pic of the player!
Or do I misunderstand the meaning of a community?
No offense ( Usually the starting line of offending someone, but still I have to say it for protection I guess :p )
We are indeed a community, and we would have some good laughs at times, but if you are posting pics that are too small for cutting then it would be kind of a disturbance to those who want to help. A better way to do that is that if you cannot find a good pic, you should ask for help in the image finder thread instead of making a request.
We are all doing the researches and cutting either for our own sake that the player we wanted has a facecut or doing it because we want to contribute to the community, if there is an award for doing anything useful in sortitoutsi, @mons and @Baja would be way ahead of you :p
Last but not the least, whether you have a wide knowledge of football does not apply to the matter that we are discussing, which is the fact that you gave us a small pic that is not worth cutting this time.
If there is an award for doing anything useful in sortitoutsi, @mons and @Baja would be way ahead of you :p
I know that and I of course don`t question that or doubt it.
But then please consider the implementation of a 5th Button when requesting here for adding a missing image in poor quality
That would safe everyone time.
My english is not the best - I come from Germany.
So when I say I mean no offense, I really mean no offense.
That whole discussion(s) - I had many with mons about several pictures - could be preventet, if you install a 5th Method of instant adding - without the neccessaty of getting into discussions inside the forum.
Because I had a mental crashdown in 2015 and even typing now takes its time for me to to so...
So please please everyone be kind to each other, especially me!
Thank you in advance!
Here guys, come have a Bier with me
I know that and I of course don`t question that or doubt it.
But then please consider the implementation of a 5th Button when requesting here for adding a missing image in poor quality
That would safe everyone time.
My english is not the best - I come from Germany.
So when I say I mean no offense, I really mean no offense.
That whole discussion(s) - I had many with mons about several pictures - could be preventet, if you install a 5th Method of instant adding - without the neccessaty of getting into discussions inside the forum.
Because I had a mental crashdown in 2015 and even typing now takes its time for me to to so...
So please please everyone be kind to each other, especially me!
Thank you in advance!
Here guys, come have a Bier with me
But what would be the purpose for a 5th button be added? If no good source is available, then cutters won't be able to cut it anyway, so what's the point in requesting it anyway? I'm sorry for your ailment, and I genuinely appreciate the enthusiasm, but it is and always should be the requester's responsibility to find good sources. I don't want our limited number of cutters to spend time looking for sources themselves.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
@NassFas, a few of yours cuts don't seem to be as sharp as the original source quality would merit, so I suspect you're not cropping the original source before using remove.bg, which means you're then having to upscale the cut to fit the 250x250 canvas size, which means the original image quality is not maintained. Please make sure to crop the source image before removing the background on remove.bg, as illustrated in the first bit of the below tutorial:
@NassFas, a few of yours cuts don't seem to be as sharp as the original source quality would merit, so I suspect you're not cropping the original source before using remove.bg, which means you're then having to upscale the cut to fit the 250x250 canvas size, which means the original image quality is not maintained. Please make sure to crop the source image before removing the background on remove.bg, as illustrated in the first bit of the below tutorial:
That's strange. I did actually crop this image before putting it in remove.bg.
This is the fixed photo I will submit. Again, I don't know how this image ended up like this, because I did crop the image before putting it in. This video will show what happened.
It's not entirely clear what happened because there's a bit of the video blacked out, but why don't you save the remove.bg cut on your desktop, then open it through photopea, then resize down to 250x250. Whatever it is you did in that blacked out bit of the video is what's causing the image not to be as sharp as the original source.
Alternative here:
(Right one)