Jonathan Gradit - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
85052254
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@mons
@Hasjasja
The first image comes from the site " ligue1.fr " , the second image comes from the official website of RC Lens. Logically , the second image should be better because an PNG image is of better quality than an JPG image of 96 dpi.
Mons , you know better , what do you think ?
A PNG image is not necessarily of better quality to a JPG image. In this case, the reason I believe it might be better has got nothing to do with image quality (or provenance) but to the fact that the face in the second source takes up more space, and will therefore result in a sharper cut, than the one in the first image.
As an aside, in the future please do not use the upload response button when uploading an alternativee source because this automatically marks the first image as completed - which it would be better to leave to the cutter's discretion to decide which to use 😉 Just use the upload image button so there are 2 pending sources 🙂 Then either a staff member decides to reject either of them or a cutter decides to cut one instead of the other
A PNG image is not necessarily of better quality to a JPG image. In this case, the reason I believe it might be better has got nothing to do with image quality (or provenance) but to the fact that the face in the second source takes up more space, and will therefore result in a sharper cut, than the one in the first image.
As an aside, in the future please do not use the upload response button when uploading an alternativee source because this automatically marks the first image as completed - which it would be better to leave to the cutter's discretion to decide which to use 😉 Just use the upload image button so there are 2 pending sources 🙂 Then either a staff member decides to reject either of them or a cutter decides to cut one instead of the other
Ok it ' s noted.
The cutter usually chooses the easiest source to cut and not necessarily the best or the most recent source. Afterwards , it is already very nice to cut it.
Something else , do we get a better result if we change the image size by replacing " 96 dpi " by " 300 dpi " for example in " photopea.com ".
The image size automatically adapts to the new resolution , here 300 dpi.
This enlarges the image to about 300%. Does this give a sharper cut ? Personally , i see no difference because we can zoom in if we want.
I do it only when the source is too small so very rarely. I show you an example just below.
Ok it ' s noted.
The cutter usually chooses the easiest source to cut and not necessarily the best or the most recent source. Afterwards , it is already very nice to cut it.
Something else , do we get a better result if we change the image size by replacing " 96 dpi " by " 300 dpi " for example in " photopea.com ".
The image size automatically adapts to the new resolution , here 300 dpi.
This enlarges the image to about 300%. Does this give a sharper cut ? Personally , i see no difference because we can zoom in if we want.
I do it only when the source is too small so very rarely. I show you an example just below.
All that did here was to upsize the image, which does not actually increase image quality. All it does is just decrease the sharpness of the image and there's no real benefit by doing that.
All that did here was to upsize the image, which does not actually increase image quality. All it does is just decrease the sharpness of the image and there's no real benefit by doing that.
So the result will be the same whether we cut one or the other , we might as well keep the original size if i understood correctly.
I wanted to be sure before cutting others.
Otherwise is there a way to improve the quality of an image ?
I won ' t bother you too much with my questions , you have already helped me enough.
Thank you so much.
So the result will be the same whether we cut one or the other , we might as well keep the original size if i understood correctly.
I wanted to be sure before cutting others.
Otherwise is there a way to improve the quality of an image ?
I won ' t bother you too much with my questions , you have already helped me enough.
Thank you so much.
Your first paragraph is correct.
As for the 3rd paragraph, image quality can only be improved by finding a bigger, better version of the same source.
You're not bothering me at all, feel free to bounce off your questions with the community :thup:
I tried to give the image a more natural looking color.
I tried to give the image a more natural looking color.
I'll let you cut that one.
Personally , i think the best sources are video 1080p screenshots. It is generally very recent.
I go to youtube and i type the name of the player. So facebook or RMC sport is well for the good video.
@Hasjasja
The first image comes from the site " ligue1.fr " , the second image comes from the official website of RC Lens. Logically , the second image should be better because an PNG image is of better quality than an JPG image of 96 dpi.
Mons , you know better , what do you think ?