@mons this kind of cuts are simply pointless.

If it's downscaled and the noise reduced, then it could well be an acceptable cut, I think. If you find a better source, then it will definitely be much better but in the absence of that, we have to use what material we have. Not every single cut will be absolutely perfect, unfortunately, and there's nothing wrong in aiming for better, but sometimes you have to be practical and accept what you've got.

This is just one in big bunch of bad cuts,probably the worse.I've got a feeling that sometimes is simply a lot better not to have anything that something very bad.Over the weekend I'll send you report from last collection.Found the one and requested. 👍

This cut can certainly be improved, but I think it's unfair on the cutter to say it's 'very bad'. With a little bit of further tweaks, it would be acceptable. Like I said, we won't get perfect cuts for everyone and we have to sometimes accept some which aren't ideal. It's always better than having a blank space, I feel.

Moreover, tagging me and pointing out something is ‘very bad’ doesn't really fix the root issue of the cutter's technique needing some work or guidance towards improvement, because otherwise the same issue will keep repeating itself. It's much more constructive if you tag the cutter and tell him what he might be doing wrong and how he can improve his cuts in the future. 

Think of it in this way: at work, what is more helpful, getting told something is wrong or being shown how to do it better? Remember, what might be obvious to you as a frequent user for a long time might not be equally clear for a new user or a new cutter 😉

I look forward to the fixes, as per usual, but I always think that you spending so much time on fixing cuts is somewhat of a waste of such a good cutter's valuable time when we have so many, often excellent, sources pending 😉 Everything is gratefully received however, naturally 🙂