Joaquín García - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
75049249
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@woken_sali, please be a bit more selective when uploading images. The current cut-out is recent and of a better quality than the cut you've just uploaded, which is not as sharp and seems to have been upsized from a smaller source. The last 2 packs have the same issue for some cuts in fact. Don't just get the sources and cut them, check beforehand if they will actually improve the current cut. Newer does not automatically mean better 😉
When a person has a recent and high-quality cut, there is no need to make a new cut of them again soon afterwards unless he's changed his appearance substantially (which is not the case here), because the eventual cut will be practically similar in look, and in this case inferior in quality. It won't be added to the megapack, so it's not worth the time to cut.
We've been through this a few times already, so do please keep it in mind for future packs 👍
Hi Mons, I wanted to renew a bit what I had done and with what you have shown me, I took the cuts from exactly the same source as the current ones (i.e. the official website of Audax Italiano) especially because in some people the aspect changes a lot from one year to another and I disagree in some cases like this one, but you decide, that's why I upload them because in the end the experience of this is yours. Besides I quickly identified that they were the ones I made and sent you some time ago and I know the difference in quality that was behind the handling of some tools.
Hi Mons, I wanted to renew a bit what I had done and with what you have shown me, I took the cuts from exactly the same source as the current ones (i.e. the official website of Audax Italiano) especially because in some people the aspect changes a lot from one year to another and I disagree in some cases like this one, but you decide, that's why I upload them because in the end the experience of this is yours. Besides I quickly identified that they were the ones I made and sent you some time ago and I know the difference in quality that was behind the handling of some tools.
My point, as I have explained elsewhere, is that the official website photos are not always the best images to choose for cutting. They are sometimes quite small, and it seems to be the case here.
While I agree that your cuts are better than before, that's not exactly what I'm talking about here. What I'm referring to is the fact that the sources you're choosing aren't good enough, and again this is something I've spoke to you about already. A cut can only be as good as the source it's from. If the source is small and/or not too sharp, then the cut can't be very good. Look at the current cut, which is sharp and clear, and compare it with your cut which is somewhat blurry to see what I mean.
Please, make sure you look for the best possible sources before making any more cuts. I'm having to reject a lot of these, which is a waste of your cutting time at the end of the day.
@woken_sali, please be a bit more selective when uploading images. The current cut-out is recent and of a better quality than the cut you've just uploaded, which is not as sharp and seems to have been upsized from a smaller source. The last 2 packs have the same issue for some cuts in fact. Don't just get the sources and cut them, check beforehand if they will actually improve the current cut. Newer does not automatically mean better 😉
When a person has a recent and high-quality cut, there is no need to make a new cut of them again soon afterwards unless he's changed his appearance substantially (which is not the case here), because the eventual cut will be practically similar in look, and in this case inferior in quality. It won't be added to the megapack, so it's not worth the time to cut.
We've been through this a few times already, so do please keep it in mind for future packs 👍