Liam Bridcutt - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
5131225
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@ryanpark, you don't think the source I posted is larger and therefore better? Come on man, a bit of common sense…
@ryanpark, you don't think the source I posted is larger and therefore better? Come on man, a bit of common sense…
@mons The picture is the original squad photo so the same format as all the other ones that come with the game, hence trying to keep it all the same/ uniformed.
regarding your previous comment reference screenshots, this is what I uploaded previously and there was no issue whatsoever, and the image quality is great. The reason I continued to upload the same thing was in the hope that the same person as previously would pick it up and therefore there would be no issue. This of course wasn't the case.
@mons The picture is the original squad photo so the same format as all the other ones that come with the game, hence trying to keep it all the same/ uniformed.
regarding your previous comment reference screenshots, this is what I uploaded previously and there was no issue whatsoever, and the image quality is great. The reason I continued to upload the same thing was in the hope that the same person as previously would pick it up and therefore there would be no issue. This of course wasn't the case.
We're looking for the best quality images. The ones you've posted are not the best quality, in fact I've found better versions after searching on Google Images for a few seconds, plus there was a higher-quality one requested for Fiorini already on his timeline. An image 329 pixels high from the chest upwards will not naturally lead to an improvement 250x250 cut-out, because it's not large enough once it's cropped.
If an image is rejected, requesting it again will only see it get rejected. Take the hint the first time round. And just because an image was cut doesn't mean it'll be added to the megapack. A Patino cut was added just a few weeks back, there was no need whatsoever for it to be requested again, let alone cut, for example. We have guidelines and rules to make things easy for both requesters and cutters. Ploughing on without paying them any attention serves no purpose to anyone 😕
We're looking for the best quality images. The ones you've posted are not the best quality, in fact I've found better versions after searching on Google Images for a few seconds, plus there was a higher-quality one requested for Fiorini already on his timeline. An image 329 pixels high from the chest upwards will not naturally lead to an improvement 250x250 cut-out, because it's not large enough once it's cropped.
If an image is rejected, requesting it again will only see it get rejected. Take the hint the first time round. And just because an image was cut doesn't mean it'll be added to the megapack. A Patino cut was added just a few weeks back, there was no need whatsoever for it to be requested again, let alone cut, for example. We have guidelines and rules to make things easy for both requesters and cutters. Ploughing on without paying them any attention serves no purpose to anyone 😕
@mons fair enough I get your point, and appreciate what you guys do, like everyone else I’m sure. Regardless, there is no need for your rude gestures.
This is the 1st time I have done this in a long time of being a member, you will be pleased to know it’s also the last.
@mons fair enough I get your point, and appreciate what you guys do, like everyone else I’m sure. Regardless, there is no need for your rude gestures.
This is the 1st time I have done this in a long time of being a member, you will be pleased to know it’s also the last.
I'm sorry it might have across as rude, but so did you repeatedly ignoring feedback and guidelines specifically laid out to avoid extra work for cutters, staff and the requesters themselves too.
You're more than welcome to request all the images you want, just make sure they follow the guidelines…
@ryanpark, you have already been asked not to provide screenshots of images as requests and had an explanation as to why that is not what we're looking for. Moreover, excellent sources for these players are available online already, so there's no need to request them in this manner.