@renskay, the majority of these cuts could have easily been done in 250x250, so I'm rejecting the lot.
Instead of dumping a batch of images onto the forum, you should have checked the guidelines:
There are also plenty of them without collars, cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, or images which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. I'm afraid you've wasted a lot of time to little avail. Read the guidelines and ask for feedback next time.
@renskay, the majority of these cuts could have easily been done in 250x250, so I'm rejecting the lot.
Instead of dumping a batch of images onto the forum, you should have checked the guidelines:
There are also plenty of them without collars, cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, or images which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. I'm afraid you've wasted a lot of time to little avail. Read the guidelines and ask for feedback next time.
they are fine as they are. the original images are not high enough quality to be 250x250.
Condescension is warranted when you ignored the guidelines, and also ignored my final paragraph that:
There are also plenty of them without collars, cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, or images which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. I'm afraid you've wasted a lot of time to little avail. Read the guidelines and ask for feedback next time.
You've done some great work with editor data files, but that doesn't give you reason to just ignore this forum's guidelines :s
Condescension is warranted when you ignored the guidelines, and also ignored my final paragraph that:
There are also plenty of them without collars, cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, or images which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. I'm afraid you've wasted a lot of time to little avail. Read the guidelines and ask for feedback next time.
You've done some great work with editor data files, but that doesn't give you reason to just ignore this forum's guidelines :s
You have not even examined the files I have uploaded and determined a judgement based on two or three images.
Do you want me to just upsize the images and make them degrade in quality even more?
Or AI upscale them so that look they “normal” like it seems a lot of people are doing.
Just because you're a moderator doesn't give you reason to be dismissive and rude to people who put in work voluntarily on your behalf.
You have not even examined the files I have uploaded and determined a judgement based on two or three images.
Do you want me to just upsize the images and make them degrade in quality even more?
Or AI upscale them so that look they “normal” like it seems a lot of people are doing.
Just because you're a moderator doesn't give you reason to be dismissive and rude to people who put in work voluntarily on your behalf.
If you see my download history, you'll see that I downloaded all your packs, so I didn't base my judgement on two or three images, no.
All your cuts were in 180x180. There is no way that better sources were available for none of them - in fact, the community has since found and requested some of the original sources, which are amply large enough to accommodate a 250x250 cut. I'm pretty sure that this is the case for most of the sources for your cuts, so I'm not sure your argument that upscaling the sources would be needed holds particularly well. As for AI enhanced images, I have pointed it out on the forum several times over the last week or so - but at around 20,000 cuts uploaded over the last 10 days or so, I'm afraid some will have squeezed through. I'm quite confident they will account for an extremely small proportion thereof, however. There are several I saw and which I did not include in the last update pack, in fact.
As already pointed out, a significant of your cuts also had no collars, others were cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, and there were several which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. This all points out to a lack of consideration to the forum's guidelines. If there were a handful of images to fix, I'd just point it out and get on with fixing them, like I do all the time. 215 is more than a handful, however, and I don't have the time to be fixing that amount of images. We have guidelines and we ask you to follow them. If you don't want to, that's your decision, but it's then my decision not to accept them. If you don't like that, then I'm afraid it's your issue and not mine. Going by your past uploads, which have been pretty much consistently not considered in line with the guidelines for various reasons, it's not a particularly new development, either.
Background and Stadium Packs
@renskay, the majority of these cuts could have easily been done in 250x250, so I'm rejecting the lot.
Instead of dumping a batch of images onto the forum, you should have checked the guidelines:
There are also plenty of them without collars, cut poorly or cropped too far from the chin, or images which are simply not improvements on the current cuts. I'm afraid you've wasted a lot of time to little avail. Read the guidelines and ask for feedback next time.