Nick Van Kenhoven - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

2000499194

Nick Van Kenhoven does not have an active image. You can still upload one or add a comment.


Timeline

3240x2156
This image is part of a pack: More missing staff and players
Pending by Jordyy on 02 Jan 2026 20:29:22
Rejected by mons on 03 Jan 2026 13:08:34
Julk44
3 years ago
19 minutes ago
26,304

@mons most of images of this pack were resized with IA

Jordyy
5 years ago
2 hours ago
464
By Julk44 03 January 2026 - 07:52 AM UTC 

@mons most of images of this pack were resized with IA

 

I just downloaded the images from their respective sources (websites, facebook, twitter, instagram, LinkenIn, etc.). Some may have been edited by the authors/clubs themselves, but definetly not all of them, and not most either i think. You can see freckles, wrinkles, hair in detail, etc in most of them. No resizing has been done on my end. Just download and convert to .png in the same size as the original download. The ones coming from Alamy i did remove the tag on the face, thats it. To generalize based on a few pictures is ignorance. @Julk44 @mons 

mons
20 years ago
4 hours ago
101,347
By Jordyy 03 January 2026 - 13:44 PM UTC 

I just downloaded the images from their respective sources (websites, facebook, twitter, instagram, LinkenIn, etc.). Some may have been edited by the authors/clubs themselves, but definetly not all of them, and not most either i think. You can see freckles, wrinkles, hair in detail, etc in most of them. No resizing has been done on my end. Just download and convert to .png in the same size as the original download. The ones coming from Alamy i did remove the tag on the face, thats it. To generalize based on a few pictures is ignorance. @Julk44 @mons 

 

I checked the first 4 pending images in this pack, and all show signs of having been enlarged using AI. If it was the odd one, I'd understand it, but 4/4 is a pattern. There's a reason we don't want AI enlarged images and it's because the end result won't be realistic. I don't have the time or inclination to check both rejected packs to see which of the dozens of requested sources haven't had AI used on them - that's supposed to be the requester's job, after all.