@Empareus If the player already have a 250 cut, there's no point in submit a smaller one. If you read the guidelines as we've told you several times, you would know.
@Empareus If the player already have a 250 cut, there's no point in submit a smaller one. If you read the guidelines as we've told you several times, you would know.
You replied to my first one (Kelsey Mooney) with a link. I did everything that followed in that link, I did not see anything that said if the player has a cut in 250x250 that a 180x180 one would be rejected. Could you please just send me the link to the guidelines?
You replied to my first one (Kelsey Mooney) with a link. I did everything that followed in that link, I did not see anything that said if the player has a cut in 250x250 that a 180x180 one would be rejected. Could you please just send me the link to the guidelines?
All due respect but how am I meant to know from that that a 180x180 one would be rejected, as it doesn't mention anything about new cuts colliding with old cuts?
I read "If the source is large enough and at a high resolution, the cut should be produced in 250x250. Otherwise the cut should be in 180x180" and it made sense to me that a new cut would not be rejected due to the fact a previous cut from 2 years ago was 250x250.
All due respect but how am I meant to know from that that a 180x180 one would be rejected, as it doesn't mention anything about new cuts colliding with old cuts?
I read "If the source is large enough and at a high resolution, the cut should be produced in 250x250. Otherwise the cut should be in 180x180" and it made sense to me that a new cut would not be rejected due to the fact a previous cut from 2 years ago was 250x250.
You must be kidding. Let me explain it clearly. If there's no photo, 180 cuts could be accepted if they meet the guidelines (which this one doesn't because it doesn't even have collars, something all cuts must have). But if there's a 250 cut of good quality/resolution, it's impossible for a smaller one to be better. 250 > 180. You get that?
You must be kidding. Let me explain it clearly. If there's no photo, 180 cuts could be accepted if they meet the guidelines (which this one doesn't because it doesn't even have collars, something all cuts must have). But if there's a 250 cut of good quality/resolution, it's impossible for a smaller one to be better. 250 > 180. You get that?
You could've just said “The resolution needs to be better or equal to than the previous cut” and I would've understood the entire thing.
You could've just said “The resolution needs to be better or equal to than the previous cut” and I would've understood the entire thing.
Fair enough, but you could also understand that "the cut should be produced in 250x250" means that... "the cut should be produced in 250x250". And 180 isn't 250
Fair enough, but you could also understand that "the cut should be produced in 250x250" means that... "the cut should be produced in 250x250". And 180 isn't 250
Hello, I have a one hour response time. I like to say that I did not write my messages. I had a friend of ours translate and illustrate them for me, since my English skills are not that good. I wish, as my friend said, that I do not believe the rules are written in my language, and my Google Translate system does not seem to give me an understandable answer in Norwegian. I apologize if any tones used were violent or inappropriat. my friend is very much aggressive.
My friend let me own his account so I can suggest faces for my gear.
Background and Stadium Packs
@Empareus If the player already have a 250 cut, there's no point in submit a smaller one. If you read the guidelines as we've told you several times, you would know.