Juan PARK0829 - Comments

It's not a bad source but a new cut was made for him just minutes ago if you browse up the timeline so it's no longer necessary.

I'm sorry @Juan PARK0829, but these are not improvements. Some are alternatives at best and others are even worse than the existing megapack cuts. I draw your attention to points 7 and 8 of the guidelines when making a teampack request:

7. Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
8. Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.

They're there to avoid precisely this kind of request, which would not be a productive use of our cutters' time. Since this is not the first time you've had a request rejected, can you please take the time to read, and follow, the rules in the future before making a request? We are not a bespoke cutting service and our cutters' time is intended to focus on adding and improving the megapack.

This pack for Valencia was released less than a couple of months ago, if you want to use the ones in there instead

Lazio players were cut a couple of weeks ago here.

It is the most suitable picture of your requests in the meantime. However, it is better to request for the largest photo if possible.
In addition, Park Jun-Tae was excluded from the Jeonnam for drunk driving.

they are certainly not improvements. It is hard to get a high-quality picture of Korean players. So I am waiting for the SI CUT of fm2020.