Home
Blog
Careers
Forums
Downloads
FM24 Real Name Fix
FM23 Real Name Fix
FM23 New Leagues
FM24 Tactics
FM24 Data Update
FM Database
FM Guides
FM Shortlists
FM24 Wonderkids
FM24 Free Players
FM24 Bargains
FM24 Players to avoid
FM24 Club Budgets
FM24 Club Facilities
Graphics
Installation Guides
Records
Prediction League
Fantasy Football
Search
#16129 Best Films About Football
chokosc
#16035 Capital One Cup 2012/13
chokosc
#15644 Poor old Robbie Keane
chokosc
#15581 Susie Prediction League 2013/14 Discussion
chokosc
12:45 Manchester United v. Arsenal 1-2
15:00 Fulham v. Everton 0-3
15:00 Norwich City v. Stoke City 0-0
15:00 Sunderland v. Aston Villa 2-1
15:00 Swansea City v. Chelsea 1-3
15:00 Tottenham Hotspur v. Wigan Athletic 4-1
17:30 West Ham United v. Manchester City 0-2
Sunday 4 November
13:30 Queens Park Rangers v. Reading 0-0
16:00 Liverpool v. Newcastle United 0-1
Monday 5 November
20:00 West Bromwich Albion v. Southampton 3-2
#15426 Black Ops 2
chokosc
Hopefully BO2 is just as fun and good as BO1!
Campaign = Should be amazing as always
Online = Hopefully as good as BO1, if not better
Zombies = Instant win!
#14709 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Still think it is something the police should also look at.
And, am I the only one that finds it really weird how referees aren't recorded? It shouldn't be too hard and it would make this thing finish a lot faster.
#14674 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Society of Black Lawyers are the ones that said the police need to investigate.... They have a point. Why would the FA, who Cluttenburg is working for, take control over the investigation?
#14555 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
I didn't say he was 100% biased, just that most of his decisions (the bad ones) went United's way...
1. It wasn't as bad as you are making it to be. Should have been a yellow, I would agree on that but never a red.
2. Both feet were high (Cleverly's and Torres' so that is why he didn't get a red. How does that not make sense? Both went for the ball, not intentional and 9/10 times that is only a yellow card.
3. Because he realised how stupid he was sending Torres off and he knew that he has to do the same for both teams.... To bad it was too late for him to make up for what he already ruined.
4.Same as 3.
And how can you say that we were sliced apart? Seriously, after 20 minutes you guys were no where to be seen on the pitch! You did absolutely nothing after your two goals. Did you just go after you went 2-0 up? You were lucky the de Gea had a really good game, or else you would have been 4-2 by half time...
And I have a question for you... How come Rooney wasn't sent off? He made more than enough fouls to get himself a second yellow card.
#14263 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Neither am I. I am at the same place as you. I can't see any contact but there probably was (the slightest of them) and he went down (not saying he shouldn't. Just compared it to the Torres incident and showed why Twattenburg is such a cunt.
#14260 Forget goal-line technology
chokosc
#14254 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
The fact that Young went down and got the free kick doesn't surprise me. In those situations, it usually goes with the attacker. Although I can't say anything like that especially after the way Cuntenburg refereed yesterday. Young had less contact (can barely be seen in a close up replay so how Cuntenburg saw it is beyond me) so how he didn't get called for diving could be one of two things:
1. Because he was clearly through on goal and he fell, Cuntenburg decided that it has to be a foul because a goal isn't enough for United.
2. The obvious reason which I won't state because I will just start everything again.
Yet when it comes to Torres, who also had the opportunity to go on goal (of course not as obvious as Young because he had to be faster than Rio and De Goat to the ball) but he assumed that it was a dive. Why he did that is beyond me and just shows how terrible / biased he is...
#14168 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
#13948 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
I know it was a foul but it was ruled out for offside (the linesman put his flag up for offside and the referee did the 'move' for offside). Still, it should have been ruled off anyways so you are right.
Ivanovic probably did although it is hard to see if there was or wasn't contact in when he fell but when stuff like that happens it goes with the attacker 98% of the time so I don't mind that. Torres on the other hand got a yellow card for that challenge and rightly so. It was a high foot, don't think he meant for it to be that bad and 98% of the time referees give a yellow card for that. From there on it was just terrible! And Hernandez's goal wasn't unlucky for us. We were robbed!
Two intentional stamps, Distin (got booked for that) and Mirallas.
#13930 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Both Liverpool and Chelsea were robbed. Although I liked the way Everton played and Suarez should have been off.
#13900 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Why would they allow him? He can piss it all out if he wanted...
#13897 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
Don't know the full story but from a quick google search I found enough to justify it.
#13884 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
2. Torres was supposed to be substituted off before the attack were he WAS fouled. So not only he let United play on although the substitution was all ready, he sent off a player for being tackled and taking contact, as well as a perfect opportunity for us to make it 3-2! Would have been so, so different had Cuntenburg been less of a cunt!
3. How could that not be an offside? Seriously! He came back from the goal and the only things he was between was 11 Chelsea players and 10 United players to the goal and the crowd. What the fuck?!
And United fans crying about having things going against them... Who the fuck got a penalty that shouldn't have been a penalty? Ya, I bet you don't remember that! Stop crying, you have been given the backing of the FA and referees for a good while now! Is that not enough!?
And before anyone asks, I am mad. Very mad. And rightly so.
#13785 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
You must be joking! I could clearly hear the Chelsea fans singing when you scored the first and even after you scored the second!
#13784 English Premier League 2012/2013
chokosc
We started bad and finished very well. Hopefully we can keep pushing like that and get two more goals!
COME ON CHELSEA!
#13138 C# Help!
chokosc
Someone on the website you showed me wrote down a working code. It is full of things that I don't know yet so I'll just ask my teacher what to do. Maybe he'll tell me it is enough (what I have already done) seeing as how we haven't really learnt much.
#12957 C# Help!
chokosc
Sad to hear that! Have the next 3 years to study this
#12658 C# Help!
chokosc
#12651 C# Help!
chokosc
#12643 C# Help!
chokosc
in the Console.WriteLine?
#12626 C# Help!
chokosc
I found this website that explains arrays but I am not sure which to use and how.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa288453(v=vs.71).aspx
#12620 C# Help!
chokosc
What do you mean?
#12619 C# Help!
chokosc
#12616 C# Help!
chokosc
For our first project we need to think of a problem and solve it. I decided to go as close as possible to what we did in class. What we did in class is take a word, change it's first letter to a capital letter and then put the capital letter back. The problem is that it was only the first letter and not the rest of the word.
So I decided to try and get the whole word in and this is what I got so far:
start:
Console.WriteLine("Please enter a word below:"
Console.WriteLine(""
string str = Console.ReadLine();
char char1;
if (str[0] >= 97)
{
char1 = (char)(str[0] - 32);
}
else
{
char1 = (char)(str[0] + 32);
}
char char2 = (char)(str[1]);
char char3 = (char)(str[2]);
char char4 = (char)(str[3]);
char char5 = (char)(str[4]);
Console.WriteLine(""
Console.Write(char1);
Console.Write(char2);
Console.Write(char3);
Console.Write(char4);
Console.WriteLine(char5);
goto start;
The problem with that is that it has to be a 5 letter word. if it is lower than that, it just gives me an error and if it is more than that it doesn't finish the word.
So my question is: is there a way to use if and tell it how many chars we need, depending on how many letters there are? So basically:
if amount of letters = 2
char char2 = (char)(str[1]);
if amount of letters = 3
char char2 = (char)(str[1]);
char char3 = (char)(str[2]);
and so on.
Thanks for any help!
#12481 Susie Prediction League 2013/14 Discussion
chokosc
Aston Villa v Norwich 2-1
Arsenal v QPR 0-0
Reading v Fulham 1-3
Stoke v Sunderland 0-1
Wigan v West Ham 3-2
Man City v Swansea 2-0
Sunday 28th October 2012
Everton v Liverpool 2-1
Newcastle v West Brom 3-0
Southampton v Tottenham 1-1
Chelsea v Man Utd 2-1
#11763 UEFA Champions League 2012 - 2013 Thread
chokosc