iLLs` - Comments

There's too much snow in the hair, and it seems the edges were erased manually, leading to edges which aren't smooth @iLLs`.

 

Can you upload the original source, because this needs to be replaced?

That's one action I never really use these days. That action file was created a fair few years back when sources were very poor and fuzzy, and it helped improve the eventual cut. With larger, good-quality sources such as this one, it's not really needed.

The second cut contains face imperfections and is therefore better than the first cut, which was overly and unnecessarily photoshopped.

Whatever you've done to that very good source image has made the final cut look like a bad taxidermy or a waxwork. Please avoid doing it again in any future cuts 👍

Can we have the original sources for these 2 rejected cuts @iLLs`?

 

Please avoid using image enlarging software, or whatever tool you used to make him look like a waxwork. Using an AI image enlarger just “guesses” what certain pixels should look like when you make the image larger, and the result looks blurry/out of focus on certain details, with unrealistically smoothened skin, and unnatural looking hair/beard/eye/teeth details.

@iLLs`, please avoid using image sharpening software. If the source is small, cut it in 180x180, that's perfectly acceptable 👍

@iLLs`, images should be uploaded only on the submissions forum.

 

Here's a video of how to do so. Once you upload them there, I'll delete this one 👍

 

Done! Thanks!!!