Barclays Premier League 2013/14

576,623 6,390
Login to Comment Search

Sam
20 years ago
3 years ago
5,092
11 Jan 2014 18:55:15
Dammit Smalling, should be 3. What a ball Kagawa.

Playing at a really high tempo and attacking through the middle. What's going on?
Ninja
16 years ago
9 years ago
5,341
11 Jan 2014 18:57:00
This is where you wish Kagawa had a pair of bollocks.

If he could do this when the chips are down we'd be 10x a better side.
SpinSwimScream
16 years ago
2 weeks ago
1,598
11 Jan 2014 19:03:58
Januzaj has been brilliant too, his crossing has been really dangerous.
Sam
20 years ago
3 years ago
5,092
11 Jan 2014 19:06:38
Kagawa should have scored, I think that showed his loss of confidence of late. He needs a goal.
Ninja
16 years ago
9 years ago
5,341
11 Jan 2014 19:10:48
If Evra is injured and Coentrao is available for £12m, and wants to join and we still don't sign him I'll kill someone.
Sam
20 years ago
3 years ago
5,092
11 Jan 2014 19:13:31
Swansea attack down our left and get into the area, Buttner doing well again then, man got past him so easily.

PLEASE can we get rid of him.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:13:49
DZEKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:18:49
This is City's title to lose. A class above everyone else.

I guess that's what hundreds of millions of pounds gets you.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:20:58
Obvs
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:40:45
Ahahahahahahahahaha. Absolute cracker disallowed
Carroll.
17 years ago
5 years ago
3,361
12 Jan 2014 14:40:54
That is a ridiculous decision.
The Platypus
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,784
12 Jan 2014 14:41:45
Fucking cock
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:41:48
Absolutely scandalous decision.
Poe
20 years ago
2 weeks ago
3,676
12 Jan 2014 14:42:22
I hate how the big teams get the decisions all the time.

Ridiculous.
Number 1
18 years ago
3 years ago
3,650
12 Jan 2014 14:44:00
What a game-ruining cunt.
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:44:05
By Poe | On 12 January 2014 - 14:42 PM
I hate how the big teams get the decisions all the time.

Ridiculous.

It's mind-boggling how that's been given. For the linesman to overrule the referee he has to be 100% sure.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:45:50
Linesman gave it initially, ref just asked him if Gouffran was in Hart's way, and he said yes
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:46:14
By Number 1 | On 12 January 2014 - 14:44 PM
What a game-ruining cunt.


Hardly ruined the game, it was after 30 mins and it's still 1-0
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:46:17
By Slashman X | On 12 January 2014 - 14:45 PM
Linesman gave it initially, ref just asked him if Gouffran was in Hart's way, and he said yes

Which he clearly wasn't. I don't see how he can get that wrong.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:47:24
By Telegram Sam | On 12 January 2014 - 14:46 PM
Which he clearly wasn't. I don't see how he can get that wrong.


Hardly "clearly", plus he's on the opposite side than the camera, depth perception can be a bitch
Poe
20 years ago
2 weeks ago
3,676
12 Jan 2014 14:47:35
By Slashman X | On 12 January 2014 - 14:46 PM
Hardly ruined the game, it was after 30 mins and it's still 1-0


Should be 1-1 though.
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:48:31
By Slashman X | On 12 January 2014 - 14:47 PM
Hardly "clearly", plus he's on the opposite side than the camera, depth perception can be a bitch

It was as clear as day that Gouffran was in no way obstructing Hart's view. No idea how you can defend that decision.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:49:24
By Poe | On 12 January 2014 - 14:47 PM
Should be 1-1 though.


Aye, but it's not like he sent 5 people off for complaining about it. Newcastle are still on top and will be unlucky not to score again before half time. Didn't ruin the game in fairness
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:49:30
http://i.minus.com/ibv9rJvzT7zym1.gif

If anyone is obstructing Hart's view, it's a City player.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:50:01
By Telegram Sam | On 12 January 2014 - 14:48 PM
It was as clear as day that Gouffran was in no way obstructing Hart's view. No idea how you can defend that decision.




Also 'clear as day' on a fucking replay, not in real time from the other side like the lineman saw
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:52:03
It's clear to anyone without Manchester City-tinted glasses that the goal should never have been ruled out. He isn't interfering with an opponent.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:54:01
By Telegram Sam | On 12 January 2014 - 14:52 PM
It's clear to anyone without Manchester City-tinted glasses that the goal should never have been ruled out. He isn't interfering with an opponent.


I didn't say it should have been ruled out. I gave reasons for the decision to be made as it was.

Also Mark Halsey doesn't have City-tinted glasses
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:55:11
Apparently ref overruled the linesman \o/
Telegram Sam
18 years ago
8 months ago
5,083
12 Jan 2014 14:56:33
By Slashman X | On 12 January 2014 - 14:54 PM
I didn't say it should have been ruled out. I gave reasons for the decision to be made as it was.

Also Mark Halsey doesn't have City-tinted glasses

Fine, but even if it's clearer on the replay it's still a shocking decision. I can understand that he's offside if he's interfering with play but I do not understand how he can be interpreted as doing so. He isn't anywhere near to obstructing Hart and hasn't touched the ball.
Slashman X
20 years ago
2 years ago
6,000
12 Jan 2014 14:57:41
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BdyZ3RjIIAEphgo.jpg:large

Guess ref assumed he blocked Hart's movement

You'll need to Login to comment