Home
Blog
Careers
Forums
Downloads
FM24 Real Name Fix
FM23 Real Name Fix
FM24 New Leagues
FM23 New Leagues
FM24 Tactics
FM24 Data Update
FM Database
FM Guides
FM Shortlists
FM24/25 Update Wonderkids
FM24/25 Update Free Players
FM24/25 Update Bargains
FM24/25 Update Players to avoid
FM24/25 Update Club Budgets
FM24/25 Update Club Facilities
Graphics
Installation Guides
Records
Prediction League
Fantasy Football
Search
VP.
Number 1
We can probably vouch for Bellamy being a cunt given he once famously threw an airport chair at one of our coaches following a row over a parking space, and almost clobbered Shay Given instead.
Maybe refs have spent so long having players shout at them that they now think its time to give it a go back themselves, to some respect. If it stays at words and doesn't escalate to refs jut not giving decisions because they hate the players, then that is a problem.
Ninja
This came up when I was on a reffing course once. The course leader was Phil Sharp, who ran the line in the 2002 World Cup final, so has probably heard it all.
His justification of why you don't see it punished is due to two factors.
The first one is refs don't want to ruin the spectacle of the game by sending off players for something that only really effects them.
The second is that because at a Professional level you're surrounded by police, security guards and authority figures that are there to protect safety that you know abuse is never going to go beyond verbals. Referees at the level we played at don't have that and you have to manage the game better and deal with issues using what you have at your disposal. If you lose control at the back of the mind theres always the worry that something could go wrong.
That's no justification for what players do, but as an explanation for why referees don't deal with it I think both points are quite good.
I quite like Clattenberg's way of dealing with it though, officials at this level are obviously thick skinned but I bet Lallana felt like enough of a dick to shut up for the rest of the game without Clattenberg having to send him off.
Number 1
Ninja
Carroll.
bluemoon.
I've always hated this is as a reason not to send somebody off. It's total bollocks. The only people it 'ruins the spectacle' for is the team that's down to 10 men.
King Luis
Yeah not like theres thousands of fans in the stadium who have paid to watch the game.
tmatthew
Why? Surely there's a difference between saying the ref made a bad decision, and implying the ref was deliberately biased?
Ninja
I'm not saying it's right, just that I've heard thats how at least some of them think.
Jonas
Slashman X
Clearly a way of just making sure they don't get Clattenburg as a ref for a while. Not a bad idea
Slashman X
Fuck off, that's a shit reason
King Luis
Im not saying its not a shit reason, but it would hardly ruin the spectacle for one a team who lose a player would it. They're not sat watching the game.
Slashman X
A smaller team scoring early against a bigger team ruins the spectacle more than a red card, should we stop letting that happen?
bluemoon.
And? Red cards are part of the game. If you start using that as an excuse not to make certain decisions then the whole game's fucked. If it's an offence worthy of a red card then a red card should be given, regardless of 'the spectacle of the game'.
I know, I was aiming it more generally at people who believe that.
Shola
Seems a bit shit.
Number 1
Probably, yeah. Doubt it'll work, mind.
I thought this was happening a lot more often in what the police think are games with potential for trouble. It's a bit shit, yes, but it seems to be viewed as the solution to... something.
hammer9
Telegram Sam
Carroll.
Could just drive to wherever the official transport meets, imagine that would be stadium, then I don't see there is much difference driving a few more miles
Poe
If someone was getting a train into Newcastle to watch the game they'd have to go 15 miles out their way just to drive 15 miles back again on a supporters coach, then after the game travel 15 miles back to Sunderland just to travel 15 miles back into Newcastle for their train.
Makes extremely little sense and it's not going to stop violence.
Poe
If someone was getting a train into Newcastle to watch the game they'd have to go 15 miles out their way just to drive 15 miles back again on a supporters coach, then after the game travel 15 miles back to Sunderland just to travel 15 miles back into Newcastle for their train.
Makes extremely little sense and it's not going to stop violence.
Carroll.
I'm not saying its not an inconvenience cause it is, but it's not that bad
Shola
Well that's 'fine' assuming you live south of Sunderland. If you live north - it will mean travelling in the wrong direction. Plus a massive ballache for people who live within walking distance of the stadium. Instead of a 2 minute walk, a two hour journey and the additional costs of it.
Number 1
The two teams have also put out the following joint statement...
Slashman X
Crane
Slashman X
Franck
Good for him.