Win a copy of FM24 in our Prediction League. Prizes are given out to the best predictor each month, so you have multiple chances to win.


Dutton
17 years ago
3 months ago
1,101
By Shola | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 20:14 PM
Implying that it is a enthusiastic challenge, and an unfortunate accident. Which it wasn't.


Of course it was.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
No it wasn't, it was a dangerous challenge. He owes it to Haidera not to go into a challenge like that because there is a good chance he can break his leg.
Pippadoc
15 years ago
3 years ago
386
By Shola | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 21:47 PM
No it wasn't, it was a dangerous challenge. He owes it to Haidera not to go into a challenge like that because there is a good chance he can break his leg.

Just because it was dangerous, doesn't mean it was intentionally dangerous.

I've seen a lot of outrage, from various places, about this. But I think we should give McManaman the benefit of the doubt - fair enough he committed a dangerous challenge, but a doesn't mean he wasn't honestly attempting to win the ball.

He's 21, he made a silly mistake and for now lets leave it at that.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
I didn't say it was intentionally dangerous. Just dangerous. He's putting a risk on a fellow professional's career, by going in dangerously.

McManaman may be 21 and made a mistake due to over-enthusiasm. But Haidera is 20 and yet to make his full Premier League debut and didn't go into the tackle dangerously and will now face a long time out. Whelan and Martinez have acted disgracefully in basically denying that he did anything wrong.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
4 months ago
2,411
Premium
By Shola | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 21:47 PM
No it wasn't, it was a dangerous challenge. He owes it to Haidera not to go into a challenge like that because there is a good chance he can break his leg.

You said it wasn't an accident. It can be dangerous and accidental at the same time, they aren't mutually exclusive.
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
The only difference it makes is that if he meant to do is that he'd know what to target rather than unintentionally hitting it, but if you're careering straight at the player like he was that's inevitable. There's no way you could stop such a mindless challenge from hitting a player when his leg is right in front, and the red card should have been shown for such a moronic judgement.

Neither player nor Wigan have apologised. It's the very least they could do and it's pretty amazing to not even be afforded that courtesy.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
By bluemoon. | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 22:45 PM
You said it wasn't an accident. It can be dangerous and accidental at the same time, they aren't mutually exclusive.


ac·ci·dent
/ˈaksidənt/
Noun
An unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury.

A serious injury isn't unexpected, when a player enters into a challenge like that. It's not really an accident if McManaman was negligent.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
4 months ago
2,411
Premium
By Shola | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 00:16 AM
ac·ci·dent
/ˈaksidənt/
Noun
An unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury.

A serious injury isn't unexpected, when a player enters into a challenge like that. It's not really an accident if McManaman was negligent.

ac·ci·dent
/ˈaksidənt/
Noun
An unfortunate incident that happens unexpectedly and unintentionally, typically resulting in damage or injury.

Even by your own definition the tackle was an accident.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
Yes, it fulfills one half of the definition.
Poe
17 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
He went into that tackle to clatter him - I don't think he meant to hurt him as much as he did but unfortunately when you go in studs up at knee height that kind of thing can happen.

It's a disgrace that he's been let off without any punishment whatsoever but that's the FA for you, pointless arguing the toss about it as it won't matter.

On the bright side:

I'll be delighted to see Wigan, QPR or Villa go down, before it was just QPR or Villa.
Poe
17 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
By Jaygull | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 18:49 PM
You mean a minority of fans, the manager who has done very little wrong, a chairman who was expressing his personal opinion and a player who has only played a handful of professional games?

And what decision? You don't have to make any knee-jerk decisions, you can just calm down and argue that the rules ought to be changed because McManaman didn't get charged. No-one is asking you to make generalizations about Wigan, you started doing it on your own. You're the one accusing the FA of being corrupt and saying that Wigan would be cheating if they survived in the Premier League- if these are the judgement calls you are making, then you're just embarrassing yourself.


I'm not making generalisations - just the way they have conducted themselves over the entire debacle has been entirely unprofessional and poor. Also, just because he's only played a handful of professional games doesn't protect him from criticism, I've played 0 professional games and I wouldn't launch into a tackle like that. He's done it in reserve matches before too. As someone else said - Haidara hasn't made his full debut in the PL yet and didn't go around studs up on McManaman's knee.

Maybe saying they're cheating was over the top, apologies - but I was annoyed.

I won't retract my comment about the FA being corrupt though, they definitely are.
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
My point wasn't that McManaman launched into the tackle because of inexperience, I didn't even talk about his intentions or the reasons for his horrific tackle. I'm just saying that it is right for Martinez to stick by a young player of whom we have no real substantial knowledge about.
Poe
17 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
By Jaygull | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 02:20 AM
My point wasn't that McManaman launched into the tackle because of inexperience, I didn't even talk about his intentions or the reasons for his horrific tackle. I'm just saying that it is right for Martinez to stick by a young player of whom we have no real substantial knowledge about.


It's not though - it's defending a tackle which is completely unacceptable. He should have said the tackle was a disgrace. It doesn't matter how young you are. You don't tackle like that.
Sam
17 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
I was expecting/hoping McManaman to at least apologise by now.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Poe | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 02:30 AM
It's not though - it's defending a tackle which is completely unacceptable. He should have said the tackle was a disgrace. It doesn't matter how young you are. You don't tackle like that.

Yeah, this.

You don't go in like that, because what happened is exactly what can happen, and exactly why it's dangerous.

It's not in the category of Roy Keane intentionally going out to hurt Haaland, but it is dangerous, it is clearly excessive force and clearly should not be defended by Martinez, Whelan or anyone.

On him getting away with it, I don't like the FA's appeal process, but this is not so much a failure of the appeals process as a damning indication of refereeing culture.

As a referee you are actively coached into not admitting a mistake, if you are being assessed at any level and admit to making an error (even if it is obvious) you WILL be slammed by an assessor. That means that referees at the top level are coached from the day they got into refereeing into denying that they have ever made an error, at least publicly. You then have a system that only works (or begins to work) if referees are accountable, and own up to their mistakes. It's an obvious conflict. The assistant that claims to have seen the incident is an embodiment of that culture, he should be sacked (its gross incompetence) and if he is then at least some justice is done.
JCash3000
11 years ago
10 years ago
353
Poe
17 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
By Ninja | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 09:54 AM
Yeah, this.

You don't go in like that, because what happened is exactly what can happen, and exactly why it's dangerous.

It's not in the category of Roy Keane intentionally going out to hurt Haaland, but it is dangerous, it is clearly excessive force and clearly should not be defended by Martinez, Whelan or anyone.

On him getting away with it, I don't like the FA's appeal process, but this is not so much a failure of the appeals process as a damning indication of refereeing culture.

As a referee you are actively coached into not admitting a mistake, if you are being assessed at any level and admit to making an error (even if it is obvious) you WILL be slammed by an assessor. That means that referees at the top level are coached from the day they got into refereeing into denying that they have ever made an error, at least publicly. You then have a system that only works (or begins to work) if referees are accountable, and own up to their mistakes. It's an obvious conflict. The assistant that claims to have seen the incident is an embodiment of that culture, he should be sacked (its gross incompetence) and if he is then at least some justice is done.


Completely agree with all of this - if the linesman has supposedly seen it then why was no action taken at the time?

When Coloccini nearly ended Suarez, the linesman started flagging like man even though he didn't actually touch him - which deservedly brought him a red card.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Linesman saw it but didn't see 'all' of it. Which somehow means no action can be taken
SpinSwimScream
14 years ago
4 days ago
1,598
awful decision, but it is in no way Wigans fault that they got away with it
Poe
17 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
By SpinSwimScream | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 11:29 AM
awful decision, but it is in no way Wigans fault that they got away with it


I realise this and retracted what I said - however their attitude to the tackle is still absolutely appalling.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
4 months ago
2,411
Premium
Gus Poyet to Reading apparently.
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
By SpinSwimScream | Permalink | On 20 March 2013 - 11:29 AM
awful decision, but it is in no way Wigans fault that they got away with it

I think we can all accept the fact that Wigan did not tell McManaman to go out and fuck up one of our players but their attitude, both from top brass and supporters, has been extremely unprofessional.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
1 day ago
5,082
Premium
This thread descends into farce when there's no actual football being played.
Deleted Account #151676
Former BBC director general Greg Dyke is taking over as chairman of the FA. He is currently chairman of Brentford but is stepping down to take the FA role.
VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
West Ham have got the Olympic stadium i believe.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
I'm not sure why my money is being spent on building West Ham a new stadium.

They're only contributing something like £15m of the £190m it is costing to convert it.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
It's gonna be used for athletics and concerts as well. Suppose that's the reasoning behind the Gov't contributing
BR.
17 years ago
2 years ago
1,896


What a load of weirdos.
VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
By BR. | Permalink | On 22 March 2013 - 17:07 PM
What a load of weirdos.


I think cunts is the right word.

You'll need to Login to comment