K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
Only it's quite obvious that Ronaldo was less than pleased about selling Ozil, Di Maria and Alonso
Based Jorge
11 years ago
4 years ago
1,399
They still have Bale, James Rodriguez, Toni Kroos and Luka Modric. It's not as if their Arsenal and not replacing stars that leave.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
They've broken up a side that just won the Champions League and by all accounts Ronaldo was fond of those/mates with them.

They've also started terribly in La Liga and are already 6 points behind Barca.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
It's more been Ronaldo fuelling it off and on since he moved than wishful thinking. Even if it's just been to get contract renewals he talks about how much he loves United at least once a season.

I do wonder if he wonders what might have been at times. He's only won one league title and one Champions League (albeit La Decima) since he's left (barring the Copa Del Ray) until last season wed arguably been more successful than Madrid since the years he left and with him in the team we'd only have been better.

I've never really been convinced he would come back after Ferguson retired though, playing under him again was the attraction rather than playing for us specifically. Still think he'd come back if he left Madrid over other destinations, but not that he'd force a move.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
2 months ago
2,411
Premium
The Guardian, Telegraph and Mirror are all saying we're going to go big Ross Barkley in the summer.

Wouldn't mind seeing it happen but I suspect it'd take a mammoth fee.
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
Also he'll probably be put of by what happened with Rodwell
bluemoon.
17 years ago
2 months ago
2,411
Premium
Maybe. I would if I was him, Barkley's already missed plenty of time through injury, I doubt he wants to miss the best part of 2 years through injury.

Seriously, though, Barkley's better than Rodwell and there's more of an opening for him than there was for Rodwell.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Fuck off, don't want Barkley
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
Barkley always seems a less good Rooney.

Would have thought Sterling and maybe Ramsey would be the way to go.
Chera
17 years ago
4 years ago
248
Ramseys been poor this season. Comes across as a touch arrogant now.

Slashman, why don't you want Barkley? Think hes got a big future.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Because he's not that good and will cost a fortune
Based Jorge
11 years ago
4 years ago
1,399
Barkley's decision making is terrible. Has all the attributes to be good just like Jack did, but he lacks it tactically.
Chera
17 years ago
4 years ago
248
Would hope he develops his decision making with age and experience as most players do. Agree that he will cost a fair bit mainly because hes English & also Everton seem to be able to get good money for their players.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Don't really think Barkley's that good a player tbh. Certainly got some technical ability and can beat a man, but he'd get half the hype if he wasn't English.

For the money Everton would want (surely 40m+) you'd get far better players in either of the posistions he can play.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
2 months ago
2,411
Premium
Don't really think Barkley's that good a player tbh. Certainly got some technical ability and can beat a man, but he'd get half the hype if he wasn't English.

For the money Everton would want (surely 40m+) you'd get far better players in either of the posistions he can play.

Almost certainly. They wouldn't be home-grown though, unfortunately that's important enough to play a part in transfer policy.
King Luis
18 years ago
10 months ago
3,111
Almost certainly. They wouldn't be home-grown though, unfortunately that's important enough to play a part in transfer policy.


Thats the problem, the home-grown quota was well intended but all its served to do is increase the cost of English players and it just means teams are bringing in young players from abroad and using them to fill the quota
Poe
18 years ago
2 days ago
3,675
Much rather have Sterling than Barkley.
.verse
13 years ago
11 months ago
871
Much rather have Sterling than Barkley.

Sterling is definitely England's best young prospect.

I'd go as far as saying that the England NT should be built around him already.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
Barkley is far more attainable than Sterling though.
Flash.
18 years ago
1 year ago
677
Why do people keep comparing Sterling and Barkley?

They're very different players.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
2 months ago
2,411
Premium
Why do people keep comparing Sterling and Barkley?

They're very different players.

They're young, English and attacking midfielders. That's enough for vague comparisons (and bullshit opinion pieces in the tabloids).
Crane
15 years ago
1 month ago
2,434
Premium
Morgan Schneiderlin:

Was the meeting with Southampton officials on July 29 tense? Yes. During the last months, there was interest from clubs. 3 clubs and among them Tottenham. Since February-March, I and my agents talked with Southampton about a possible departure. The club always told me they will sell me for the right price. Me and my agents went to that meeting on July 29, with a very serene state of mind, with very exciting propositions. To me, with my 6 years spent at Southampton and what I always gave to the club, everything should have been sorted out during that day.

I told them I signed for a project that was supposed to keep the best elements to go higher. And before that meeting, Lallana, Lovren, Lambert, Luke Shaw and Chambers all left. I asked my-self: ‘That is not the same situation anymore, that is not possible. What are they doing?’ At that moment, Southampton didn’t hire anyone yet. Chambers signed at Arsenal the day before our meeting. And the club started to see the fans were getting mad. They thought: ‘If Morgan will leave, the stadium will be burnt.’ So they guaranteed us: ‘Morgan is not for sale. We won’t listen to anything. Morgan will stay. That is the project. There is nothing more to say.’ It was a real shock to me. I thought: ‘Why do they block me while I gave my very best and experienced everything with that club.’ Of course, I was angry.

I thought: ‘I just played in the World Cup after 2 good seasons in Premier League. I always shut up. I can’t stay in a team that will play for salvation. I need to reach a new level.’ So I told them: ‘You don’t respect me, you don’t respect your words, you treat me like cattle.’ They defended their interest and I defended mine. My tweet after the meeting? I know there are opportunities you can’t miss. That is why I was upset. After that meeting, I had to show I disagreed. With that Tweet I wanted people to understand the situation. In 5 seconds I saw what social networks are. It is like a bomb. That tweet was a key moment in my career.
Jason
18 years ago
4 days ago
4,641
The key question in all of that, does he regret it all, especially with how Southampton have started the season.
Number 1
17 years ago
1 year ago
3,650
Tom Ince going from turning down Inter to joining Notts Forest after failing to get game-time at Hull.

Impressive how far he's fallen.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Falling implies he was at a height in the first place
Shedender
18 years ago
1 month ago
13,751
Tom Ince going from turning down Inter to joining Notts Forest after failing to get game-time at Hull.

Impressive how far he's fallen.

Wait, do you mean he actually didn't sign for Inter Milan? Shows how much I've paid attention.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
I'm 90% sure the Inter Milan thing wasn't a real offer.

Just doing a favour for a ex players son to make him look attractive to clubs that actually wanted him.
Number 1
17 years ago
1 year ago
3,650
That's probably what it was tbf. But it still makes him look like a prat.
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
Hull are bigger than Inter Milan imo. But seriously I don't think signing for Inter means that much anymore.


It's a clever ploy by Hull to make him look shit so they don't have to pay much compensation. Tactical Bruce.
Franck
18 years ago
2 days ago
4,255
They're only four years off a CL title, of course signing for Inter is still a big deal.

It's not the same as it would have been in say, 1997, but nothing is.

You'll need to Login to comment