Memphis Depay - Submissions - Cut Out Player Faces Megapack

37024470

Timeline

mons
17 years ago
18 minutes ago
85,494
@Maxime51100, please keep in mind points 4 and 5 when making requests:

*Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
*Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.

In all 3 of your requests I've rejected, the source is almost identical to the present MP cut. There's no value in having a slightly more recent cut which is identical, and I'd much rather our cutters spend their time on genuine improvements
Maxime51100
13 years ago
2 weeks ago
494
Hi Mons,

Lucas Tousart is actually an improvement the current shot is blur
And Pape Cheick the picture date to 2015 plz
Ok for Depay
mons
17 years ago
18 minutes ago
85,494
Hi Mons,

Lucas Tousart is actually an improvement the current shot is blur
I'll sharpen it a bit, but even as it is, the present cut is still better than anything your source could provide

And Pape Cheick the picture date to 2015 plz
Again, I repeat: "Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality." When looking at the source and the present cut, would you be able to tell which is the oldest? No, I reckon - and so it's not an improvement.

Ok for Depay

If cutters want to cut either of them, then of course I will consider the cuts, but there is no point in making requests of sources like these when the present MP cuts are perfectly fine and quite recent.
Kruna
13 years ago
2 months ago
1,599