Memphis Depay - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
37024470
Background and Stadium Packs
Submitted
04 Dec 2024 08:53:49
Timeline
This image is part of a pack:
PSV [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Netherlands U-21 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
PSV [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Netherlands WC [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Manchester United [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Manchester United 2016/17 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Mixpack Barclays Premier League 1617 [Old Pack Submission]
This image is part of a pack:
Lyon [Old Request Response]
This image is part of a pack:
Lyon [Old Request]
This image is part of a pack:
Olympique Lyonnais [Old Request]
Hi Mons,
Lucas Tousart is actually an improvement the current shot is blur
And Pape Cheick the picture date to 2015 plz
Ok for Depay
Lucas Tousart is actually an improvement the current shot is blur
And Pape Cheick the picture date to 2015 plz
Ok for Depay
Hi Mons,
Lucas Tousart is actually an improvement the current shot is blur
I'll sharpen it a bit, but even as it is, the present cut is still better than anything your source could provide
And Pape Cheick the picture date to 2015 plz
Again, I repeat: "Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality." When looking at the source and the present cut, would you be able to tell which is the oldest? No, I reckon - and so it's not an improvement.
Ok for Depay
If cutters want to cut either of them, then of course I will consider the cuts, but there is no point in making requests of sources like these when the present MP cuts are perfectly fine and quite recent.
This image is a response to
#178517
*Just because a source image is more recent than that in the MP does not automatically mean it's an improvement. It's better to have a slightly older image in the MP if it is of better quality.
*Ask yourself, is it really an improvement to the existing MP image? If it's the same face and hairstyle with just this season's new kit, it's probably just an alternative.
In all 3 of your requests I've rejected, the source is almost identical to the present MP cut. There's no value in having a slightly more recent cut which is identical, and I'd much rather our cutters spend their time on genuine improvements