Data Update Poll!
Hello, there is currently an important debate going on regarding how to manage the FM24 Data Update going forward, particularly in the case of modifying the ages and contract dates by 1 year. Please can you vote in the poll and join in the discussion.
X Y
One bug though, and I cannot for my life figure out why it won't load the badge of Keszthely FC (7521320), the file seems right, the config seems right. If you can lift the veil on this mystery, I would be quite grateful.
Update: new, complete logopack for all clubs in the game.
mons
File type is .PNG. For some reason, FM doesn't read files in .PNG, but only when they're in .png. Rename it, and you should be fine
X Y
My Top 10 in this regard are:
7521301 Egerszalók
7521328 Vasszécseny
7521335 Sümeg
38005153 Mezőhegyes
38017666 Viadukt Biatorbágy (here the black outline of the text and bridge would be needed with a white edge / halo)
38017653 Szabadkígyós
38042176 Unione FC
38060139 Energia SC Gyöngyös
38060237 Kakasd SC
38059854 Lajosmizse
X Y
Thank you, that indeed was the problem. Attached is a fixed version.
X Y
Let me also thank and recognize the previous work of WhiteH, so that Lipót, Füzesgyarmat, Úrkút and Bácsalmás are already included with a much improved logo compared to what one can find online. (From the logo restoration thread)
X Y
<record from="2062055027"
to="graphics/pictures/club/2062002130/icon"/>
?
mons
The UIDs are different - is that intentional?
X Y
Yep, for some reason the game changed the UID for the newly generated club in a different save (might have tinkered with the db as well, can't remember), I did not care for chaning the file name. But this brought me to the idea that there might something with naming that's wrong. Have a look at the icon file, maybe I have overlooked something.
mons
What am I supposed to be seeing here? 😀
In the above code, is there a reason why it's on two lines rather than one line?
X Y
You do not see the attached image below the post?
mons
I thought you wanted me to check something in the image itself rather than the file :doh:
Nothing much wrong there as far as I can see.