Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By Dutton | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:30 PM
And why do we need to have a player on the left that can beat a man(which he can do anyway) and deliver a cross? Who are they crossing to? Rooney. Do Spain and Germany play with out and out wingers on the left? I can't think of many who do actually.

I think we need more width to our play and we're more likely to have that if we employ out-and-out wingers. Perhaps Welbeck can occupy that role, and last night's performance wasn't his best, but regardless of personnel I think we need old-school wingers. Spain and Germany are able to play a relatively narrow formation given their ability to pass and move with greater intricacy than we can. We aren't able to create chances from tighter spaces as they can, and such we need to use our wide players as wingers to draw out the full-backs and create that space.

Look at the Rooney goal, for example - Walcott was wide on the right, and when Wilshere burst forward, he was able to slot the pass through because there was a sizeable gap between the centre-half and the left-back. That's our best bet of scoring, in my opinion, as opposed to packing the central area with players and try and pass our way through the centre-halves.
VP.
14 years ago
2 months ago
25,271
By Dutton | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:30 PM
He's fast, can beat a man and his interplay with others is excellent. He's also got an eye for goal, not one part of his game? Come off it.

And why do we need to have a player on the left that can beat a man(which he can do anyway) and deliver a cross? Who are they crossing to? Rooney. Do Spain and Germany play with out and out wingers on the left? I can't think of many who do actually.


Well we'll look at it another way, it doesn't have to be actual crosses does it (head height), but there needs to be some kind end product. So if his low goal tally is due to him playing on the left this season, then surely his assists must be half decent?
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Yeah, the actual important part of the whole move (which if he had actually got his head up would have been a very simple pass). Same as the other gif, gets to the important part where you need that bit of quality, and falls over.


Which is what I said on page fucking 13, he's struggling in the box at the minute.

By Ninja | Permalink | On 05 February 2013 - 16:09 PM
It's not so much that he's a bad finisher, he's actually really good at times and especially when wearing an England shirt. It just seems to be some sort of mental thing where he hasn't scored in a while and he's really struggling in the box at the minute.


And he has 3 assists I believe, same as Young and 1 less than Valencia.
VP.
14 years ago
2 months ago
25,271
By Ninja | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:41 PM
Which is what I said on page fucking 13, he's struggling in the box at the minute.

And he has 3 assists I believe, same as Young and 1 less than Valencia.


I'm sorry, i don't hunt through previous pages to make sure i don't mention something someone else may have done already. And tbh, that gif does more to make him look useless than actually good.
Dutton
18 years ago
9 months ago
1,101
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:36 PM
Look at the Rooney goal, for example - Walcott was wide on the right, and when Wilshere burst forward, he was able to slot the pass through because there was a sizeable gap between the centre-half and the left-back. That's our best bet of scoring, in my opinion, as opposed to packing the central area with players and try and pass our way through the centre-halves.


That makes no sense then, you said you wanted an out and out winger to beat a man and get a cross in. In this situation Walcott's been played through the middle and had a shot. Are you suggesting Welbeck couldn't do that?
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By Dutton | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:58 PM
That makes no sense then, you said you wanted an out and out winger to beat a man and get a cross in. In this situation Walcott's been played through the middle and had a shot. Are you suggesting Welbeck couldn't do that?

First, I was commenting on our general style of play - I'll hold my hands up and say perhaps I haven't seen enough of Welbeck to make a proper judgement.

Secondly, Walcott's created that space to run into because he's playing out wide. If he'd started further infield, the left-back would be marking him far closer to the centre-half, and as a result the space in which Wilshere played the pass might not have been there. Walcott's adopted a wide position, creating the space, and once Wilshere's played the pass through the gap he has enough pace to get behind the defender and take a shot.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By A Little Bit Of Merson Magic | Permalink | On 08 February 2013 - 17:45 PM
I'm sorry, i don't hunt through previous pages to make sure i don't mention something someone else may have done already. And tbh, that gif does more to make him look useless than actually good.

Well I was replying to you at the time, and we were having the discussion about 3 days ago.
AFC
17 years ago
9 years ago
186
Ferdinand back in the England squad
Dutton
18 years ago
9 months ago
1,101
By AFC | Permalink | On 14 March 2013 - 15:09 PM
Ferdinand back in the England squad


And he deserves to be.

Don't understand how Oxlade-Chamberlain is in there though.

Nice to see Dawson in there, hopefully Carrick will be a starter too.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Should reject it.
Deano
18 years ago
9 months ago
1,380
Ferdinand is only there because Jagielka is injured.
Number 1
16 years ago
1 year ago
3,650
So Ferdinand goes from seemingly nailed-on 3 game ban to England recall? Bullshit.
Dutton
18 years ago
9 months ago
1,101
By Number 1 | Permalink | On 14 March 2013 - 15:47 PM
So Ferdinand goes from seemingly nailed-on 3 game ban to England recall? Bullshit.


Genuinely wouldn't surprise me if they didn't take action because of this "news" today.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
Fair play to Rio, he's been excellent this season. Deserved his chance. I'm surprised that Oxlade-Chamberlain's made it in, he's barely played in recent weeks.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
Hart
Johnson - Ferdinand - Dawson - Baines
Carrick - Gerrard
Walcott - Rooney - Welbeck
Sturridge

I reckon that's our strongest team from that squad. Ferdinand and Dawson should be our centre-back pairing if we're judging solely off of recent form.
Number 1
16 years ago
1 year ago
3,650
By Dutton | Permalink | On 14 March 2013 - 16:14 PM
Genuinely wouldn't surprise me if they didn't take action because of this "news" today.

Already confirmed he's escaped. It's amazing how much of a free ride that is.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Rio Ferdinand really is a prat isn't he...

Kicks off he's not in the squad when he doesn't deserve to be, then when he does deserve to be pulls out because he can't be arsed.

Steven Taylor and Rickie Lambert should be in this squad btw.
Sam
18 years ago
2 years ago
5,092
Brilliant news that Rio is not in the squad anymore.

Fuck you FA and fuck you Hodgson.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By Sam | Permalink | On 18 March 2013 - 17:15 PM
Brilliant news that Rio is not in the squad anymore.

Fuck you FA and fuck you Hodgson.

What? Why the hate for Hodgson? He was put in an incredibly tough situation before the Euros and handled it the best he could, even if you don't agree with the decisions he made.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
1 month ago
2,411
Premium
Yeah, fuck you Hodgson, you old bastard.
Dutton
18 years ago
9 months ago
1,101
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 18 March 2013 - 18:20 PM
What? Why the hate for Hodgson? He was put in an incredibly tough situation before the Euros and handled it the best he could, even if you don't agree with the decisions he made.


Probably because of the pathetic "footballing reasons" excuse.

I don't really care if he plays for England or not, on one hand if he's happy to play for England then fair enough but I'd much rather he didn't for United's sake. I doubt I'd want to play for them had I been so poorly treated though.
Sam
18 years ago
2 years ago
5,092
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 18 March 2013 - 18:20 PM
What? Why the hate for Hodgson? He was put in an incredibly tough situation before the Euros and handled it the best he could, even if you don't agree with the decisions he made.


He handled it terribly, he could have easily said the reason Rio wasn't called up was due to the Terry and Cole issue, 'footballing reasons' for Rio's omission was ridiculous. He picked a player with a racist abuse charge over his head instead of a player who's brother had been racially abused, and said it was because of footballing reasons, bullshit. Cahill picked up an injury and Roy picks Martin Kelly as his replacement, still 'footballing reasons'? Rio managed to play 38 games last season in a team that finished 2nd in the table, level on points with the champions.

What are the footballing reasons? Why hasn't Hodgson explained them? He wonders why he's always asked about Rio.

On his way to an Arsenal match in October he tells passengers that Rio's England career was over. Unprofessional and disrespectful towards Rio.

Hodgson and The FA have treated Rio like shit, being incredibly disrespectful to him. Capello also: not even meeting Rio to tell him he was no longer England captain. Rio today arranged a meeting with Hodgson to explain why he couldn't be in the squad, which is very professional of him, complete opposite to Hodgson and the FA.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Yeah, if Hodgson was going to recall him he should have had a meeting with him.

His treatment of Rio has bordered on farcical and been terrible management, whether you think he should be in the team or not.
Carroll.
15 years ago
4 years ago
3,361
What exactly was Roy supposed to do? He did what any managed did and lied to protect the rest of his players. He wasn't going to come out and say that Terry is a racist prick
Flash.
18 years ago
1 year ago
677
You're also forgetting he told a random guy on the train that Ferdinand wasn't in the team before he told Ferdinand..
Jamieandhisego
18 years ago
2 years ago
841
By Carroll. | Permalink | On 18 March 2013 - 23:02 PM
What exactly was Roy supposed to do? He did what any managed did and lied to protect the rest of his players. He wasn't going to come out and say that Terry is a racist prick


Ferdinand > Terry

Especially this season.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Steven Taylor called up to replace Gary Cahill
Jamieandhisego
18 years ago
2 years ago
841
By Slashman X | Permalink | On 19 March 2013 - 10:26 AM
Steven Taylor called up to replace Gary Cahill


Well deserved call-up, probably get a game against San Marino hopefully.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Hopefully this means he'll kick on and finally fulfill that potential he has got.

He's been absolutely awesome this season.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By Sam | Permalink | On 18 March 2013 - 19:28 PM
He handled it terribly, he could have easily said the reason Rio wasn't called up was due to the Terry and Cole issue, 'footballing reasons' for Rio's omission was ridiculous. He picked a player with a racist abuse charge over his head instead of a player who's brother had been racially abused, and said it was because of footballing reasons, bullshit. Cahill picked up an injury and Roy picks Martin Kelly as his replacement, still 'footballing reasons'? Rio managed to play 38 games last season in a team that finished 2nd in the table, level on points with the champions.

What are the footballing reasons? Why hasn't Hodgson explained them? He wonders why he's always asked about Rio.

On his way to an Arsenal match in October he tells passengers that Rio's England career was over. Unprofessional and disrespectful towards Rio.

Hodgson and The FA have treated Rio like shit, being incredibly disrespectful to him. Capello also: not even meeting Rio to tell him he was no longer England captain. Rio today arranged a meeting with Hodgson to explain why he couldn't be in the squad, which is very professional of him, complete opposite to Hodgson and the FA.

I think you're being quite unfair. The situation was a horrible one, and in my opinion he made the best of a set of bad circumstances. It was clear that Ferdinand and Terry couldn't feature in the same squad, and he had to chose one. In my opinion, and it's one shared by plenty of people, Terry was the superior defender last season and based on his form was the better option for England going into the European Championships. Now, that obviously leaves a bit of a bitter taste considering that he's choosing the supposed racist ahead of the victim's brother, but as manager of the national side he had to chose the player he felt would best contribute to any potential success we were to have in Poland and Ukraine, rather than choosing on moral or sentimental grounds. Furthermore, I completely understand why he described Ferdinand's omission as being down to 'footballing reasons' - which may have be at least partially true, we don't know - otherwise that would have created an even bigger shitstorm in the media than there already was. Sure, you may not agree with that decision, but he had an incredibly difficult choice to make and made the best of a bad situation which landed in his lap as soon as he took the job.

I'd agree with you regarding the incident on the underground, as it was highly unprofessional and inappropriate and it wasn't handled properly. I don't believe for a second that he said what he said because of a lack of respect to Ferdinand, rather that he was decent enough to have a conversation with members of the public, gave them an honest answer - which I agree he shouldn't have in this case - and didn't think of the consequences of what he was saying. It was a cock-up on his part but I believe it was a genuine mistake and he apologised quickly enough. I can understand your disillusionment and/ or anger with the national set-up and the way the situation was handled, but I don't think Hodgson deserves the vitriol you're sending his way.

It's funny, really, that after this whole debacle Ferdinand finally gets the call, and despite stating his willingness to play when he wasn't being picked, it's now become apparent that he's not able to play as many games as he had previously claimed and isn't even going to be in the squad. It's a shame, really, as he's been the best English centre-half in the league this season, but it turns out the product didn't come as advertised.

You'll need to Login to comment