Ramon - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack
19350602
Background and Stadium Packs
Timeline
@Sirron, I'm afraid you're still not providing cuts with transparency. What program and technique(s) are you using? Perhaps we can guide you to produce a cut-out rather than an image...
Yep sorry my bad i just uploaded the wrong file accidently, the new one should be ok
Made quick fix:
This was cut a month ago and he doesn't look any different at all.
@Naiara de Sousa Lima the pics you have requested for this team are far too small to produce worthwhile cut-outs.
Requested pic rejected as it is poor quality (resized from a much smaller photo?) & will not produce an improvement on the current cut-out.
@mons so the source was rejected due to it was being in poor quality but the cutout resulted from a poor source, which I would say required improvement, gets approved????
@mons so the source was rejected due to it was being in poor quality but the cutout resulted from a poor source, which I would say required improvement, gets approved????
It is not humanly possible for me to see every single comment on the forum. There was a 23 minute period, at a time when I was asleep, between SSP rejecting it and rekooner cutting it; I simply wasn't aware of it.
Keep in mind that completed does not automatically mean it'll be added to the megapack, but just that it's a cut that will be taken into consideration. At first glance, there's nothing much wrong with it. When I compare it with the present megapack cut, I will then come to a decision if it's an improvement or not, and whether it is to be added to the megapack or not. I haven't done that yet (I think - I had 700 images to check yesterday, so I might have done it and forgotten about it), but again at a glance, I'm inclined to agree with SSP's assessment now that I've seen his comment.
I've rejected the two newly-requested sources for the same reason, in fact.
It is not humanly possible for me to see every single comment on the forum. There was a 23 minute period, at a time when I was asleep, between SSP rejecting it and rekooner cutting it; I simply wasn't aware of it.
Keep in mind that completed does not automatically mean it'll be added to the megapack, but just that it's a cut that will be taken into consideration. At first glance, there's nothing much wrong with it. When I compare it with the present megapack cut, I will then come to a decision if it's an improvement or not, and whether it is to be added to the megapack or not. I haven't done that yet (I think - I had 700 images to check yesterday, so I might have done it and forgotten about it), but again at a glance, I'm inclined to agree with SSP's assessment now that I've seen his comment.
I've rejected the two newly-requested sources for the same reason, in fact.
Understood your difficulties on reading every single thing so I would tag you, or if you want, other staff members so that issues could be addressed.
Thanks for the heads up on the completed status, I always thought it would be automatically included in the next pack :p
If you feel tired on fixing issues and stuff, may be just get enough rest before responding, I do not expect guaranteed responses within 24 hrs lol. Health and mental status always comes first.
If I had slowly(or quickly) becoming a bothersome issue let me know through private message :p
Understood your difficulties on reading every single thing so I would tag you, or if you want, other staff members so that issues could be addressed.
Thanks for the heads up on the completed status, I always thought it would be automatically included in the next pack :p
If you feel tired on fixing issues and stuff, may be just get enough rest before responding, I do not expect guaranteed responses within 24 hrs lol. Health and mental status always comes first.
If I had slowly(or quickly) becoming a bothersome issue let me know through private message :p
Oh no, I don't at all mind explaining the process, especially because I might need to refer to the same post in the future 😉 It's not the most intuitive system, granted, but it gets the job done. I'd like to have a different word instead of completed, but it's better than approved 🙂
It wasn't a snarky comment from my end but what I meant is (because I don't know if non-staff see this):
I genuinely hadn't seen SSP's post, so when rekooner posted the cut, I just collected it along with the rest of the pack, assuming it hadn't been rejected in the meantime…
mons