Data Update Poll!

Hello, there is currently an important debate going on regarding how to manage the FM24 Data Update going forward, particularly in the case of modifying the ages and contract dates by 1 year. Please can you vote in the poll and join in the discussion.

Ramon - Submissions - Cut-Out Player Faces Megapack

19350602

Timeline

Media not found #215587
This image is a response to #215586
250x250
mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
92,315
@Sirron, I'm afraid you're still not providing cuts with transparency. What program and technique(s) are you using? Perhaps we can guide you to produce a cut-out rather than an image...
Sirron
8 years ago
2 years ago
19
@Sirron, I'm afraid you're still not providing cuts with transparency. What program and technique(s) are you using? Perhaps we can guide you to produce a cut-out rather than an image...

Yep sorry my bad i just uploaded the wrong file accidently, the new one should be ok
Truelsen_
15 years ago
5 months ago
2,894
Still had two white lines on either side of it and a bit of snow

Made quick fix:

https://sortitoutsi.net/uploads/mirrored_images/hL1si1ktcdesH8IWYxM2JUzxgktq0GWrXeenTv3B.png
760x772
Completed by mons on 17 Jan 2021 12:13:39
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Request mixpack
Completed by mons on 17 Jan 2021 12:13:39
664x842
Rejected by mons on 15 Feb 2021 21:10:18
mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
92,315

This was cut a month ago and he doesn't look any different at all.

Side Splitting Pass
15 years ago
3 years ago
29,534

@Naiara de Sousa Lima  the pics you have requested for this team are far too small to produce worthwhile cut-outs.

888x1080
Side Splitting Pass
15 years ago
3 years ago
29,534

Requested pic rejected as it is poor quality (resized from a much smaller photo?) & will not produce an improvement on the current cut-out.

250x250
This image is part of a pack: mo8
Pending by rekooner2 on 12 Apr 2021 22:49:12
Completed by mons on 13 Apr 2021 08:27:41
600x800
384x512
Ttggfr
8 years ago
44 minutes ago
9,247

@mons so the source was rejected due to it was being in poor quality but the cutout resulted from a poor source, which I would say required improvement, gets approved???? 

mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
92,315
By Ttggfr 14 April 2021 - 14:40 PM UTC 

@mons so the source was rejected due to it was being in poor quality but the cutout resulted from a poor source, which I would say required improvement, gets approved???? 

 

It is not humanly possible for me to see every single comment on the forum. There was a 23 minute period, at a time when I was asleep, between SSP rejecting it and rekooner cutting it; I simply wasn't aware of it.

 

Keep in mind that completed does not automatically mean it'll be added to the megapack, but just that it's a cut that will be taken into consideration. At first glance, there's nothing much wrong with it. When I compare it with the present megapack cut, I will then come to a decision if it's an improvement or not, and whether it is to be added to the megapack or not. I haven't done that yet (I think - I had 700 images to check yesterday, so I might have done it and forgotten about it), but again at a glance, I'm inclined to agree with SSP's assessment now that I've seen his comment.

 

I've rejected the two newly-requested sources for the same reason, in fact.

Ttggfr
8 years ago
44 minutes ago
9,247
By mons 14 April 2021 - 15:04 PM UTC 

It is not humanly possible for me to see every single comment on the forum. There was a 23 minute period, at a time when I was asleep, between SSP rejecting it and rekooner cutting it; I simply wasn't aware of it.

 

Keep in mind that completed does not automatically mean it'll be added to the megapack, but just that it's a cut that will be taken into consideration. At first glance, there's nothing much wrong with it. When I compare it with the present megapack cut, I will then come to a decision if it's an improvement or not, and whether it is to be added to the megapack or not. I haven't done that yet (I think - I had 700 images to check yesterday, so I might have done it and forgotten about it), but again at a glance, I'm inclined to agree with SSP's assessment now that I've seen his comment.

 

I've rejected the two newly-requested sources for the same reason, in fact.

 

Understood your difficulties on reading every single thing so I would tag you, or if you want, other staff members so that issues could be addressed.

 

Thanks for the heads up on the completed status, I always thought it would be automatically included in the next pack :p

 

If you feel tired on fixing issues and stuff, may be just get enough rest before responding, I do not expect guaranteed responses within 24 hrs lol. Health and mental status always comes first.

 

If I had slowly(or quickly) becoming a bothersome issue let me know through private message :p

mons
18 years ago
2 hours ago
92,315
By Ttggfr 14 April 2021 - 15:21 PM UTC 

Understood your difficulties on reading every single thing so I would tag you, or if you want, other staff members so that issues could be addressed.

 

Thanks for the heads up on the completed status, I always thought it would be automatically included in the next pack :p

 

If you feel tired on fixing issues and stuff, may be just get enough rest before responding, I do not expect guaranteed responses within 24 hrs lol. Health and mental status always comes first.

 

If I had slowly(or quickly) becoming a bothersome issue let me know through private message :p

 

Oh no, I don't at all mind explaining the process, especially because I might need to refer to the same post in the future 😉 It's not the most intuitive system, granted, but it gets the job done. I'd like to have a different word instead of completed, but it's better than approved 🙂

 

It wasn't a snarky comment from my end but what I meant is (because I don't know if non-staff see this):

 

I genuinely hadn't seen SSP's post, so when rekooner posted the cut, I just collected it along with the rest of the pack, assuming it hadn't been rejected in the meantime…

500x500
In Progress by mons on 05 Jun 2021 07:03:23
Completed by mons on 06 Jun 2021 09:13:05
250x250
This image is part of a pack: Request mixpack
Completed by mons on 06 Jun 2021 09:13:05
451x342
This image is part of a pack: BRAZIL YOUNG GUYS 2
Pending by Vitor Azevêdo dos Santos on 05 Mar 2022 23:03:44
Completed by Ronaldo Fenômeno on 06 Mar 2022 19:29:02
250x250
This image is a response to #2227903 This image is part of a pack: BRAZIL YOUNG GUYS 2
Completed by Ronaldo Fenômeno on 06 Mar 2022 19:29:08