Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By jln22 | Permalink | On 05 August 2013 - 20:13 PM
There are better options than Marica. I am Romanian myself but the guy is not Arsenal quality.

Yeah. Here's hoping it's bullshit.
Julian.
11 years ago
11 years ago
240
Plus that I am a Spurs fan, forgot to mention.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
By jln22 | Permalink | On 05 August 2013 - 21:03 PM
Plus that I am a Spurs fan, forgot to mention.

I'd never have guessed.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BRE23wFCAAALie0.jpg:large

Was deleted soon after, but adds to the rumours of Wilshere being a cokehead
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 week ago
3,324
Premium
Might be Chamakh, he's got a thing with the shisha already.

Bendtner even.
Slashman X
18 years ago
1 year ago
6,000
Or just Merson, but that'd be extra cruel
The Platypus
14 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Clearly it's Wenger. Imagine the lines he could hoover up with that beak of his.
RealityCheck
12 years ago
5 years ago
202
Definitely Wenger.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
Bendtner, 100%.
Andy Cav
18 years ago
3 months ago
41
Premium
I feel the need to rant about Cesc Fabregas. My theory is that our part in his current saga is the public face of our transfer window.

Arsenal are a talking point in the Fabregas deal because of a transfer clause (oh no, not another one) that gives them dibs on his next move. Now Fabregas doesn't fall totally in line with what Arsenal are looking for as he's yet another talented and creative central midfielder, more attacking that not, but not to be interested in this potential move would be foolish at best, downright stupid at worst. The boy loves Arsene Wenger and Arsenal and you can't afford to turn your noses up at world-class players, even if they don't fit the exact blueprint.

If Fabregas was really available, his history at the club and all comments attributed to him indicate that we'd be in with a fighting chance of getting him and what a psychological blow it could be to beat United to their number 1 target...how have Arsenal and Wenger responded to Man United's very public pursuit of him? With complete public dis-interest. It may not be exactly the move Wenger wants to make, but by showing such little interest in Fabregas, Wenger runs the risk of pushing him closer to the United entrance...providing Barca agree to sell that is. Complete dis-interest is how Arsenal seem to have approached the whole transfer window, dithering about on any deal they're involved in and whilst keeping their eyes very much on a player who's attitude stinks, doesn't want to be in England and won't be available straight away...Ludicrous.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 week ago
3,324
Premium
I get the feeling that Wenger trusted that he won't leave for United, enough for him to not intervene.

After all it would only give the likes of Pique, Xavi and Rosell more things to complain to the media.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 week ago
3,324
Premium
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2389114/Luis-Suarez-latest-Arsene-Wenger-says-Arsenal-need-striker.html

‘I think the problem is the strength of the squad. Today is one game we are going to play 55 games. We are maybe a bit thin squad wise to go through the whole season.


This coming one week from the start of the season.

Arsene Wenger is a genius.
Hibee
18 years ago
4 years ago
588
First brand new Swiss Ramble piece in ages, given their lack of activity and the fact he supports them Arsenal are an obvious choice.
RealityCheck
12 years ago
5 years ago
202
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
I still find it funny how all these fans of small clubs are poking fun at us.
RealityCheck
12 years ago
5 years ago
202
I still find it funny how all these fans of small clubs are poking fun at us.



You think Liverpool are a smaller club than Arsenal?
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
Liverpool ain't what they use to be.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
You think Liverpool are a smaller club than Arsenal?

You're a mid-table club.

Unless you still think Forest are a MASSSIVE club as well.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Arsenal are definitely a bigger club than Liverpool.
Julian.
11 years ago
11 years ago
240
Judging by the trophies they won, no they are not.
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
You're a mid-table club.

Unless you still think Forest are a MASSSIVE club as well.



Come on
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
Aye they're far from a midtable club but they're still not bigger than Arsenal.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 week ago
3,324
Premium
I'd love to debate this, but I'm not going to jinx it.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341


They've finished between 6th and 8th for the past 4 years.

It was probably overly harsh, but I don't think people would really have any problems with me saying that Everton are a mid-table club, and they have the exact same record in that time span.

It just annoys me when football fans talk about trophies their club won before they were even born as a justification for why their club is bigger than clubs who are bigger by any other possible measure.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
They've finished between 6th and 8th for the past 4 years.

It was probably overly harsh, but I don't think people would really have any problems with me saying that Everton are a mid-table club, and they have the exact same record in that time span.

It just annoys me when football fans talk about trophies their club won before they were even born as a justification for why their club is bigger than clubs who are bigger by any other possible measure.


Because in the 10 years before these 4 years they were comfortably one of the so called "big 4" - Everton were not.

If Man Utd finish between 5th and 8th in the next 4 years they wouldn't be a "mid table club".
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Because in the 10 years before these 4 years they were comfortably one of the so called "big 4" - Everton were not.

If Man Utd finish between 5th and 8th in the next 4 years they wouldn't be a "mid table club".


10 years a go Newcastle played Champions League football, were you still a big club when you were in the Championship because of that?

And yes, we would. We'd have a big stadium and a fairly recent history of winning leagues but we wouldn't be a big club, at all, in that scenario.
Poe
18 years ago
1 week ago
3,675
10 years a go Newcastle played Champions League football, were you still a big club when you were in the Championship because of that?

And yes, we would. We'd have a big stadium and a fairly recent history of winning leagues but we wouldn't be a big club, at all, in that scenario.


Not at all but Newcastle and Liverpool are completely different. One is the second most successful club in the history of this league, the other isn't.

Liverpool are still a huge club - they've had a bit of a shit time lately but they're still a big draw.
Shola
16 years ago
6 years ago
2,708
club statute has a lot more to it than where you finished the previous season. Fanbase, ability to make money, history, the playing squad, facilities, stadium all play into the notion of club size. And suggesting Liverpool are on the same plateau as West Brom, Norwich and Swansea isn't harsh, it is just wrong.

When Newcastle were in the Championship they were definitely a bigger club than the likes of Burnley, Hull, Portsmouth and Wigan despite those all being in a higher league. Same with Wolves and Yeovil this year. And Juventus will have been one of the biggest cubs in Italy when they were in Serie B.

If say Manchester United struggled without Ferguson and finished 6th two years running, they would still almost certainly be the biggest club in England.
Ninja
15 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Not at all but Newcastle and Liverpool are completely different. One is the second most successful club in the history of this league, the other isn't.

Liverpool are still a huge club - they've had a bit of a shit time lately but they're still a big draw.


Who's the bigger club, Manchester United or Manchester City? Because according to your line of argument we are by some orders of magnitude bigger than they are, it's a nonsense.

Liverpool are not a huge club, at the moment, if they recover from this position and put together a string of Champions' League qualifications and challenge for trophies again then they will once again become one. I don't deny that their history is a draw, but that's all it really is. Players will happily turn them down to go to clubs that don't have it be it City, Chelsea, Arsenal or even Spurs.
Telegram Sam
16 years ago
3 months ago
5,082
Premium
You think Liverpool are a smaller club than Arsenal?

Yes, I do, because it's no longer 1984.

You'll need to Login to comment