murrayg
12 years ago
57 minutes ago
375
Premium
When editing a post, it doesn't appear to work if you preview the post first. Example: When I edited a post and hit "preview", it showed the preview as expected, but when I then hit "post" it came up with the "comment updated" popup, but did not actually edit the post. I edited the post and hit "post" without previewing first and it worked fine. I thought this was just relevant to the OP of a thread, but I've just tested it on a reply and realised the issue seems to be when previewing the edit.
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
The Data Update Discussion forum only allows topics right now, i'm guessing you were trying to upload a file?
hammer9
12 years ago
16 minutes ago
24,558
Just check if u going to fix thats i want move posting to other thread like wrong place

Move
Merge
Etc

Thanks
LouisBCFC
9 years ago
1 month ago
2
Premium
Hi,

I've been told I need to report this link as a bug, as there isn't currently any free mirrors available to download this change:

https://sortitoutsi.net/content/56965/wrexham-changesfm20

Thanks
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
Hi,

I've been told I need to report this link as a bug, as there isn't currently any free mirrors available to download this change:

https://sortitoutsi.net/content/56965/wrexham-changesfm20

Thanks

Should be fixed now?
tv_capper
13 years ago
11 hours ago
1,292
On the main Graphics page the 'Standard Logos' pack has a black player image rather than a logo, like all the other packs...
hammer9
12 years ago
16 minutes ago
24,558
Just check if u going to fix thats i want move posting to other thread like wrong place

Move
Merge
Etc

Thanks


fix yet?
Kaizeler
13 years ago
1 day ago
9
Premium
I've noticed that when looking at a player's profile through previous FM releases, some attributes (like age, ability) don't change (they're reflecting FM2021 numbers), but the club and the wage are in line with past games.

Example here, and if you go through individual prior years you see the same behaviour:
https://sortitoutsi.net/football-manager/person/27010680/christian-eriksen
kingrobbo
11 years ago
5 hours ago
7,642
@Footygamer

Hi
Still getting issues moving threads to various forums. See we have a new Forum for edited data so I have started moving threads there however I am unable to move some as the choice of destination varies- check out the difference between these two threads-

https://i.gyazo.com/1675b3e8cb0e1bc5e34801b9e29abb65.png

https://i.gyazo.com/7a507dc4573f34f8f69999dcac886983.png
Nafer
10 years ago
4 days ago
11
Hi! First of all, I appreciate your efforts trying to fix all the issues that brought the website update. I see that now it's possible to see a numerical value for the players' CA and PA in the teams profile pages (still not possible to see the ability number by hovering the stars in the players profile). The problem is, this number is NOT the correct number that was displayed before the update (I'm not sure, but I think that the previous value was taken from the scout program). Now, it shows some kind of percentage, which has nothing to do with the real ability number. In fact, the team overall ability displayed in the team profile page is correct. Check the Reggiana profile page, for example: the team overall is 67.3 (this number is right) but if you see the CA with the new numerical format (percentage), none of the players has an ability higher than 60%, which is a completely nonsense.

Can you please fix this and bring back the old system? You just have to revert it like it was before. Thank you so much.
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
Hi! First of all, I appreciate your efforts trying to fix all the issues that brought the website update. I see that now it's possible to see a numerical value for the players' CA and PA in the teams profile pages (still not possible to see the ability number by hovering the stars in the players profile). The problem is, this number is NOT the correct number that was displayed before the update (I'm not sure, but I think that the previous value was taken from the scout program). Now, it shows some kind of percentage, which has nothing to do with the real ability number. In fact, the team overall ability displayed in the team profile page is correct. Check the Reggiana profile page, for example: the team overall is 67.3 (this number is right) but if you see the CA with the new numerical format (percentage), none of the players has an ability higher than 60%, which is a completely nonsense.

Can you please fix this and bring back the old system? You just have to revert it like it was before. Thank you so much.

We had a legal take down notice from SEGA to remove data so we're coming up with our own method of rating players.

The percentage should be a good indicator of their ability and potential in game.

When you say "this NOT the correct number" what exactly do you mean? Do you mean a player who has 160 CA is displayed as 85% or something or that players that are worse than other players are being shown as better?
FM Bard
5 years ago
4 hours ago
41
Premium
Personally, I love the new site, I'm visiting more than ever and utilising various features etc.


Forgive me @mons if this has already been raised......I'm subscribed to numerous threads, I'm ok with getting the notifications on here but can't stop them being emailed as well. I woke up to about 50 emails for the real name fix a couple of days ago when the full game was released. 😂😊
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
Just check if u going to fix thats i want move posting to other thread like wrong place

Move
Merge
Etc

Thanks

There should be a move button under every comment now 🙂
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
Personally, I love the new site, I'm visiting more than ever and utilising various features etc.


Forgive me @mons if this has already been raised......I'm subscribed to numerous threads, I'm ok with getting the notifications on here but can't stop them being emailed as well. I woke up to about 50 emails for the real name fix a couple of days ago when the full game was released. 😂😊

If you click the settings icon in the header and choose Content Subscriptions

You should be able to click "Edit Subscription" next to each and turn off email.

I guess I should add a button to do it on mass if you are subscribed to lots of content! I'll add it to the todo list 🙂
FM Bard
5 years ago
4 hours ago
41
Premium
If you click the settings icon in the header and choose Content Subscriptions

You should be able to click "Edit Subscription" next to each and turn off email.

I guess I should add a button to do it on mass if you are subscribed to lots of content! I'll add it to the todo list 🙂


Thanks for the reply mate. I had already tried that. I can highlight email and notification in the channels box but it will not allow me to delete either of them.

Cheers
Footygamer
14 years ago
1 day ago
13,068
If you click just "Notification" then email shouldn't be highlighted and then just hit "save"
Qvordrup
13 years ago
3 hours ago
2,713
There should be a move button under every comment now 🙂

There is a move button, and it takes you to a place where you can search for the tread you want to move to. But the actual moving of the posts doesn't work.

Looking forward to this working.... the sortitoutsi background forum is a mess 🙂
hammer9
12 years ago
16 minutes ago
24,558
There should be a move button under every comment now 🙂


thanks mate
tv_capper
13 years ago
11 hours ago
1,292
The FM Records section of the right hand side bar is not populating

Every record states 'No Submissions' when you click on the record in question you can see the current outstanding records which are not been shown on the sidebar
mons
14 years ago
19 minutes ago
32,728
The FM Records section of the right hand side bar is not populating

Every record states 'No Submissions' when you click on the record in question you can see the current outstanding records which are not been shown on the sidebar

That's possibly because the staff member who usually verified record submissions had completely forgotten to do so ever since the site changeover. He's been reprimanded accordingly, I'm led to understand.

How about now?
tv_capper
13 years ago
11 hours ago
1,292
That's possibly because the staff member who usually verified record submissions had completely forgotten to do so ever since the site changeover.

How about now?
I still get the 'No Submissions' label even after reloading the page - when you check the records page the records are there (and verified) they are just not displaying on the side bar
mons
14 years ago
19 minutes ago
32,728
I still get the 'No Submissions' label even after reloading the page - when you check the records page the records are there (and verified) they are just not displaying on the side bar

I changed all the pending record categories, so they should now be operating. It'll be something for @Footygamer to be looking at then...
Nafer
10 years ago
4 days ago
11
We had a legal take down notice from SEGA to remove data so we're coming up with our own method of rating players.

The percentage should be a good indicator of their ability and potential in game.

When you say "this NOT the correct number" what exactly do you mean? Do you mean a player who has 160 CA is displayed as 85% or something or that players that are worse than other players are being shown as better?


Those are a very sad news for me. I have created a personal database using the data from this website for a couple of years. I really liked the older overall system, it was a good way to know how good were the players without seeing the actual CA. The new system is useless for me (cause it's just the CA divided by 2), but I appreciate your efforts, some people might find it interesting.

Can you please tell me how the older system worked? It was the overall rating given by the scouting program, right?

And by the way, no, the CA displayed in the players' profile is correct.

Cheers!
kingrobbo
11 years ago
5 hours ago
7,642
Those are a very sad news for me. I have created a personal database using the data from this website for a couple of years. I really liked the older overall system, it was a good way to know how good were the players without seeing the actual CA. The new system is useless for me (cause it's just the CA divided by 2), but I appreciate your efforts, some people might find it interesting.

Can you please tell me how the older system worked? It was the overall rating given by the scouting program, right?

yes its very frustrating indeed but it is what it is.

Are you aware that you can use FMRTE free version as a scouting tool?
hope this helps you😉


And by the way, no, the CA displayed in the players' profile is correct.

Cheers!
tv_capper
13 years ago
11 hours ago
1,292
I changed all the pending record categories, so they should now be operating. It'll be something for Footygamer to be looking at then...
When the records are clicked they link to 'All Time Records' page rather than the records for the current edition of FM.
The FM21 records are also not displaying on the FM21 Record overview screen either
@Footygamer can these be changed? It's currently confusing as to what the record to beat currently is.
Dmitri-K
3 years ago
15 hours ago
159
Links are opening in current tab instead of new tab.

We had a legal take down notice from SEGA to remove data so we're coming up with our own method of rating players.

So they didn't want people to see ratings? Or what was the reason?
Nafer
10 years ago
4 days ago
11
@kingrobbo I know about FMRTE, but I think that the program does not show the overall rating using the "older" way to calculate it (like it was before here in sortitoutsi). That's why I'm asking if the older overall rating were taken from the Genie Scout program or it was another calculation method.
kingrobbo
11 years ago
5 hours ago
7,642
Nafer
10 years ago
4 days ago
11


Okay, no problem, thank you. Maybe @Footygamer knows about it.
MarcLister
13 years ago
1 day ago
25
Premium
Would it be possible to have the option to change the subscription notification frequency from immediate to a daily email?

You'll need to Login to comment