@77david54 not a bad cut but did you just adjust the brightness of the source? now the left side of the cut seems to be too bright. at a minor white outline on the top of the hair.

@mons not like the cut is completely unusable but might treat is as a placeholder for the meantime.

I only increased the brightness of the source in order to see a minimum of the eyes of the cut out face.

#632061 Frederik Taouss

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

23 Apr 2021 04:10:32

This source is from October 26 , 2015 , i will cut out a source more recent.

#631727 Alerrandro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

21 Apr 2021 05:14:43

@mons , my source is from 2019.

#631715 Habib Diallo

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

21 Apr 2021 00:28:38

By FORCEMEAT TM 20 April 2021 - 15:40 PM UTC

@77david54 please cut out my suggested photo

You can try to learn to cut out , it is not difficult. You can cut out what you want. Your source is good but i preferred to cut out this one that i found very pretty.

#631592 Svante Ingelsson

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

20 Apr 2021 09:41:10

@mons , little error , no ?

#631538 Diego Buonanotte

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

20 Apr 2021 02:37:18

This last source is from April 19 , 2021.

#631369 Diego Buonanotte

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

19 Apr 2021 04:20:21

@mons , this source is on 2014/2015.

#631014 Warren Tchimbembé

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

17 Apr 2021 03:13:07

September 16 , 2020 and December 13 , 2020 for these two last sources.

#630574 Hugo Do Rego

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

14 Apr 2021 20:02:01

September 16 , 2019 screenshoot 720P , and August 8 , 2020 , for these 2 sources.

I cut the most recent to see but finally i think the first source will give a better cut out face.

#630147 Jérémy Huysman

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

13 Apr 2021 02:42:09

The other source can maybe give a better cut out face.

#629846 Guillaume Bosca

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

11 Apr 2021 17:24:52

By mons 11 April 2021 - 15:02 PM UTC

@77david54, it's a perfectly fine cut but again I'm not sure why you would choose that source to cut when a perfectly acceptable, high-quality recent source was available, looking at the camera 😕

These are two good sources of August 2020. I prefer to cut a source in 300dpi rather than a source in 72dpi because the quality is higher.

I cut what i want and i prevent anyone from cutting the other source.

Please , type “ Roberto Picardi ” of Grosseto1912 on the site and explain to me why you do not comment on Cizzu when i have a comment too often.

#629506 Vangelis Marinakis

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 22:14:14

By weeniehutjr 09 April 2021 - 20:07 PM UTC

I think what mons means is that when you brightened the image, you also reduced the contrast which made the shadows look washed out and “flat”. mons' cutout definitely has better sharpness as well. The “restoring” of the jacket looks fine imo.

Just as an example, this is what the image looks like if I reduce the contrast even further, do you see how it looks washed out/"flat" in comparison?

I haven't touched the contrast. It's okay , drop it.

#629503 Samuel Renel

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 22:09:46

An alternative cut out face.

#629471 Ørjan Nyland

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 20:07:11

By weeniehutjr 09 April 2021 - 19:56 PM UTC

@77david54 I don't understand the point of requesting that source. It's a January 2020 image, so less recent than both the current cutout and the pending source - and the pending source is already good enough to get a high quality cutout from. Save your efforts for players/staff who genuinely need improved cutouts.

Sorry , i did not look well.

#629468 Vangelis Marinakis

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 19:59:50

By mons 09 April 2021 - 16:57 PM UTC

I'm not sure what you mean by this but you also seem to have tried to tweak the source colours. The cut looks a bit washed out and devoid of sharpness. Whatever effect you attempt, I would recommend you avoid it. Other than the odd bit of added brightening for very dark sources, I suggest you avoid these kind of edits at all in general.

There i do not agree with your comment which is totally unfair in this case. I did not touch the color for this cut out face. I only increased the brightness a little then i put the cut out face you have there in remove.bg. I did not crooped any pixel afterwards so it is impossible for me to lose sharpness.

Increase the brightness of your cut out face and you will have the same cut out face as mine.

The only difference is the jacket on the right , remove.bg did not detect the jacket on the right so i had to use the “ restore ” function in remove.bg and i did the best i could.

#629384 Samuel Renel

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 14:29:03

@Side Splitting Pass , if i understood correctly , the direction of the gaze is more important than the quality of the image for your selection. I take note of it for my future cut out faces.

#629291 Issouf Paro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 00:27:00

@weeniehutjr , if you think this last is the best of both sources i will cut it , otherwise reject this source , please.

#629290 Issouf Paro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

09 Apr 2021 00:19:50

This source is of better quality but is older than a year ( August 16 , 2019 ).

#629265 Vangelis Marinakis

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 21:25:17

I had to restore the jacket on the right.

#629258 Fábio Ferreira

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 20:12:40

By Ttggfr 08 April 2021 - 18:11 PM UTC

I am a male ffs :p

“ his time ” , sorry my english is bad , my translator too.

#629212 Fábio Ferreira

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 17:21:48

By RubenSemedo99 08 April 2021 - 16:18 PM UTC

I don't think the size is an issue. In fact, I was asking @Ttggfr because he's the one who cut the image and he can tell if it was difficult or not. If it's ok, then I'll post it and you do you. No problem

@Ttggfr , Ttggfr loves to cut images , in fact , it spends her time.^^

#629207 Riquelme Mendes

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 16:53:20

@Marcelo Neves dos Santos you must be new to the forum so you have to explain to him , that's all.

Please , make sure it's the right player. Cuts the facial area and download this in “ remove.bg ” and size in 250 X 250 pixels ( or 180 X 180 for low quality cuts out face ).

#629200 Mohamed El Khaloui

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 16:22:28

@NassFas , it would have been better rotated and the collar raised to the right , especially for a good source in April 2021.

#629193 Socrates Kominakis

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

08 Apr 2021 16:05:35

@mons , source rejected because it ' s vangelis marinakis on the right.

#629052 Issouf Paro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

07 Apr 2021 19:22:07

By mons 07 April 2021 - 18:06 PM UTC

I've re-opened the originally pending source which is the only one worth cutting but I'm not sure why you asked for guidance, got two answers and ignored them both.

If you want to cut a particular source, you can go right ahead without needing to ask permission, but if you ask for feedback and ignore it, then, with all due respect, you're not really entitled to complain about being “tired of cutting for nothing” 😕

I don't understand why you constantly seem to want to over-complicate the cutting and requesting process, which really isn't that complex. If you think it's a good image just cut it, and if you don't like the image requested, don't cut it 🙂

I cut it in 2 minutes without correcting anything. If someone wants to download it , he can , that's the only reason. Your criteria for selecting a cut out face are very subjective. Personally it doesn't bother me that the player doesn't look at the camera , don't have a collar up. I mainly look at the date , the resolution and the beauty of the image and i don't really like the pre-cut but i respect your criteria. It is not to annoy you , it is just that we will never agree on what a good cut out face is , because it is a very personal opinion.

#629049 Max Jacob Bjørsvik

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

07 Apr 2021 19:04:50

@mons , weird the top of the hair with this one , no ?

#629013 Issouf Paro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

07 Apr 2021 16:14:21

By mons 07 April 2021 - 14:00 PM UTC

The one from Getty Images is larger, but it's looking away from the camera and the face is half in shadow and half in light.

The most recent source isn't enormous but it's big enough to provide a 250x cut looking at the camera without needing to upscale it and thus lose sharpness. I think I'd prefer that one tbh, especially since there is very little change in his appearance from the existing cut other than a bit of goatee to justify a replacement not looking at the camera.

I cut it in a hurry , you can reject my other source ( the last ) , please.

#628979 Issouf Paro

77david54

5 years ago

4 years ago

1,416

07 Apr 2021 13:51:06

@mons , i want to cut the second source ( source gettyimages ) but only if you think it's the best , otherwise reject it because i'm tired of cutting for nothing.