77david54 - Comments

Sorry i was wrong about the first one , i thought he had proposed his source from the site “ligue2.fr” in 700 X 700.

August 2019 and August 2020 for these two sources.

The first three sources are from the end of 2019 , the fourth source is from the end 2020.

@mons  , little mistake with that one.

I had to erase the shadow with the eraser. I did the best i could.

ON the left , larger source but one year older.

On the right.

Please , try at least once , you have some for 30 seconds. “ remove.bg ” is top to erase the background and you will have a cut fine so. You can use gimp and remove.bg.

@Petr Smitka , try to download an image or one your cut out face in “ remove.bg” to see the big difference.

Two ID for this person.

Two ID for this person.

Two ID for this person.

@Parker26  , source more recent.

I cleaned the little snow.

@yayazo  

Instagram is your friend.

The problem , it is especially that some do not make any effort of research. I am convinced that by limiting to 10 sources per user excluding staff , we increase the quality. Because finally finding sources is very easy. Finding the best is difficult.

@mons 

I enlarged the image to be able to cut it , i know that it does not improve the quality. I am of the same opinion as @Ttggfr . The staff should refuse this kind of source. The source of @yayazo  , we have the impression that the photo has gone through the washing machine.

This only commits me but i have the impression that there are fewer and fewer people to cut off the sources on hold. We should perhaps ask ourselves why ?

In two months , i won't be surprised if we have 800 pending sources. Some will be complete but will not be cut.

Personally , i think only the staff should be able to download a source pack. Site users should be limited to 10 sources. This encourages to look for better sources because we know that we are limited in number of sources. This rule would increase the quality of the proposed sources. It also encourages learning to cut. If i had known that we could download image packs , i would have offered 500 images in several packs , and above all i would never have learned to cut.

I have already tried on other cut out face. Yes we lose a little in quality but often the 250 X 250 makes better i find. Personally , from 200 , i go to 250.

Here the existing cut is already in 250 X 250 , so if it is to cut a 180 X 180 , you might as well refuse the source in my opinion.

After i congratulate @Ttggfr  for his work , he chose what seemed best to him.

@mons 

Sorry but i don't understand why this source is not cut in 250 X 250 pixels. The quality is quite good , no ?

You took the source of yayazo to cut it. The source of yayazo is of very poor quality. By enlarging the source that i posted , we get a better source and therefore a better cut out face.

@[Antoine MARIE]

If you wanted to cut it , why do you put the source on hold , there i have the impression of having wasted my time !

If not for your club , you have good sources on transfermarkt but you have to enlarge the size of the image.

You also have the club's official website on facebook or instagram.

For him i did not know which one to cut.

The first source is old , i think you can reject it.

Sorry i made a mistake , the first source is dated December 2019. All U17s have their image dated April 2016 except six including him , so my example is not good , forget.

@mons 

An example , the first source of yayazo is dated April 2016 in the url of the image when it is downloaded.

The other source that i found on instagram and that i cut is dated November 21 , 2020.

When i look at the two images , he is much younger on the first one so the date of April 2016 seems correct to me , it's written that date anyway.

In fact , it 's really not practical on the official ParisFC website. There are half of young u17 to national3 which have their image dated on April 2016 in the image url. For example the same player can have an image in u17 and another image in a higher age category. This is one of the worst sites i have seen.

I admit that i also have doubts about the date on April 2016 , but all players with this date appear younger than others.

After on photoshop , it is possible to add a jersey of ParisFC on an old player photo.

You can go to this site and look at the date of the images , you ‘ ll see , it’s a disaster.

You're too nice , i would have rejected the source so that the guy would do a little research.

There the person is not a scout or a physio , so the sources are easier to find. If i search a little , i have a good chance of finding better.

There we can see that the person who offers these sources of ParisFC took all his sources on the official site , too hard to go on instagram or facebook !

The guy , we have to cut the source and in addition it is up to us to find the source to cut.

So this image is on April 2016 , reject.

Please , reject , this image is on April 2016.