77david54 - Comments

Yes , very well. I have been cutting that for a month and i don't have photoshop. I must have taken a bad duplicate sample. So i posted two cuts.

To be honest , i don't like to cut because it is very precise work and i have very fragile eyes.

I took an hour to make this cut while the existing cut was already very good. I think i would have done better to watch a film. I remind you that my work is free.

If my work is not good enough i can stop cutting. So lacme31 can learn to cut like i did.

I don't have multiple sources in hand. When i proposed a source for this player the january 10 , 2021 , i did not know how to cut otherwise unlike some , i would have cut it myself. It is someone else who proposed to recut this player with a more recent source. I didn't want to recut this player at all , i wanted to be nice and here is the result. Yes i keep it in mind for next time. Sorry but i don't see any snow in the last cut out face.

The first source is on juny 2020 , the others sources are on november 10 , 2020.

The source is on october 13 , 2011 but i have not found better.

@mons 

Please , reject this request. He was only in FM2015 and FM2016.

You have to be really stupid to make such a request. It is to take the cutters for idiots.

Two sources on february 15 , 2021 and february 24 , 2021.

This source is on april 11 , 2006.

remove.bg is your friend.

I tried to correct the hole at the top left.

@julkjulk 

He was only in FM2015 , look next time , now you're wasting my time for a player who hasn't been in the game since six years.

@mons  

The other cut out face is well better.

Please , reject the first.

@[Neulas]

Try to download an image in “remove.bg”. You will see the big difference for the cutout et the background is erased so.

Two pictures on february 21 , 2021.

I agree with almost everything you said. For the sources of the Caen pack , it depends on the players , most give a very good result , but some are less successful in my opinion , sometimes my fault because i went up too much the collar.

The second is a bit blurry but it's really very light. It's not the sceencaps the problem , it's the movement in the video that makes it a bit blurry but you already know that. I did some screencaps when the person is still , it doesn't blur at all.

In the first , it is especially the raised collar which spoils the quality a little in my opinion and the second is newer and more natural too. I liked the third one which is the most recent but the angle , the player's gaze and the sweat spoil everything.

I think you will put the first in the megapack but personally i think the second is better. I did not erase the little snow from the second because i will not waste my time. I don't like the first source , it looks like a photo reconstructed on photoshop. And i don't like to go up the collar , it doesn't look natural and i always take it too high. For the third , i now know that a player who sweats , it is not worth cutting.

It bothers me that i am told each time that my sources are inferior , the sources of the Caen pack , i find them in 5 seconds per player and 1 minute per staff member. Now i will cut players who have nothing waiting for preference.

No big deal. I will know that we must put in working. It's the first time for me so it doesn't happen often. I still prefer the previous source , it looks more natural.

For the hair , it is not remove.bg , it is photopea.com who wrongly detected , i cut a little too short but i saw only black so not easy and i nevertheless increased the brightness.

Sorry but i do not agree at all. Already i find the other horrible source for this player. The image is missing pixels and the player does not look like that at all in real life. My source is from february 5 , 2021 , the other source must be from august 2020. It's a shame that the player lowers his head a bit on my source.

For me , other than that , my source is clearly superior to the other source. It is a pity that the cuts out faces are not in 500 X 500 pixels , there the difference is obvious. You tried to zoom in on both?

The other source is already in 300dpi. My source is therefore greater if i pass it in 300dpi. Afterwards , you put on the cut out face in megapack you want.

Not all players will always choose the one in the megapack.

Personally i recognize the player very well but each has his own.

No problem.

OK , thanks you for your response.

Thanks you , but i prefer the third one than the first , i think it's more natural , it will be useful for my next cut out faces. After it's just my personal opinion.

And i have the impression that lowering the brightness makes the image more blurry , no ?

@[mons]

Please , reject the second cut out face which is failed , no need to use the clone stamp on this player.

I try to find the right settings to avoid you correcting afterwards.

For the first cut out face , i did not touch anything , i only cut it. For the third , i only lowered the brightness and increased the sharpness. Now , when i have a cut out face that shines a little too much i will lower the brightness a little and change the sharpness or color a little so that the eyes remain visible.

I am looking well instead of yayazo and i did not know for Google reverse image search. I tough weeniehutjr or side spitting pass were only increasing the aspect ratio passing it in 300dpi what i can do myself quickly. After if it is really another source of origin , that changes everything to the quality.

And i don't know how to remove the traces of green or red on the cut out face , apart from clone stamper. Is there an easier or faster way ?

Sorry for the poor cut out face , i took the source of yayazo on google and i enlarged it of 170dpi to 300dpi , we can maybe have better with the second source.

The source come on facebook.

I think he is the right person but can someone from the staff confirm , please ?

Weird , it's a video 1080P yet.

I redid a cut out face to Boulay Dia , i let you cut the other source , if you wish it of course , which i think will give a better cut out face.

It is two recent sources in video 1080P.