Baja - Comments

Comments
#620941 Miro Varvodić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

You've cut older version @mons ,the one requested by SSP is most recent.

#620925 Alan Smith
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

This is not even correct Alan Smith?! At least he could try to find best available sources…

#620663 Abdoul Diaby
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@LFCYNWA pay attention on outline visiable on dark background,most of these needs additional clean up.

#620660 Ivan Sesar
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons be careful with this pack,since some of these might be newer,but quality is simply way too bad.They are blur,without shirt,etc.

#620654 Gustavo Silva
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Those sources are simply too small for decent cut,especially an improvement.

#620379 Uroš Kilibarda
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Great work with Spartak bro @Tatavo ,thank you very much! 😀

#620371 Aleksandar Kostić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 22 February 2021 - 15:08 PM UTC 

If you're so demanding, perhaps you can give it a go yourself or at least give us a reason why remove.bg is particularly unsuited for this source. 

 

I've tried it myself and I don't think it's particularly unusable to be perfectly honest. Sure, it needs a little bit of snow removal in the upper part of the hair and some clone stamping in the top of the hair on the left, but neither are related to the use of remove.bg and more to the trickiness of the hair in the source image.

 

Did I ask anyone in specific to do it? No,I didn't. 

If no one do it,that's fine.I can also delete this request and forget about it.

I've tried it with remove.bg also,before all this,and hair details went bad,and cleaning up already cut image is a nightmare,and most likely you'll loose some hair details.That's the only reason I wrote a comment.

Most of new cuters using just remove.bg,without much care of hair details,white outline and cleaning up that.

#620351 Aleksandar Kostić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Remove.bg is not good option to cut this one,so who ever decide to do it,please don't use remove.bg,this needs to be cut in old manner as we all was doing long time ago.

#620287 Benjamin Jeannot
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

I'm affraid that's not an improvement.By his head position you don't even know who is on image.

#620285 Saša Đurasović
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Great one @rekooner2 ,many tnx!

#620266 Kristijan Župić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Many tnx for amazing cuts @mons !

#619815 Nicolas Anelka
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 18 February 2021 - 09:27 AM UTC 

It's less likely that he sees it this way tbh. The best way would be to use the upload image button and to then tag him in a comment to bring it to his attention so that he can decide if he wants to use the source or not. Knowing him, he'll definitely have managed to find a better source than the image originally requested, mind you 😉

No worries,I've found same source right after original request only as HQ,same as around 10 more other recent HQ sources.

 

#619798 Roberto Eslava
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

If we take a closer look,this is not an improvement.He looks almost the same,but there's a big difference in quality.New one is no where close to the quality of current one.

#619796 Juan Cazares
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

There's no any difference in his look,and that source is simply poor for HQ cut.

#619747 Nuno Campos
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Already requested.

#619484 Luca Zanotti
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

My post was to prove them and point out that there are better sources to cut,not to make it as my own request.If you click on timeline of certain person,there's not much difference between posted image and maked request,both are perfectly visiable.As you pointed out,that was the point of timeline in the first place.

#619414 Jesús
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

This is how it looks on dark background and it's pretty awful.

#619407 Luca Albertini
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@maxtod77 what about this one mate?

#619406 Luca Zanotti
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

This looks way too bad especially in the case when you have source as this available.

#619404 Giuseppe Messina
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@LFCYNWA when you have such a poor sources cut them as 180x180.

#619402 Jeffren Suárez
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Small source,hair details cut off,simply not even close to be an improvement.

#619400 Hamad Mohammed Al-Hammadi
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

His hair needs a lot more cleaning up,I don't know is it look worse in white or on dark background.

#619238 Ludéric Etonde
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

That source is simply too small and as that he is useless.

#619158 Surafel Dagnachew
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@Gamatroy few tips.

Cuts should be sized as 250x250 or (in the case of poor sources) 180x180.

Also,check images both on dark and white background.For example on this one you have part of background (red) in his hair,and that should be removed.Otherwise not bad work at all.

#619104 Patrick Casey
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
#618871 Scott Packer
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@krissmed In the future feel free to reject this kind of awful cuts.

#618842 Alexis Castaño
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

That's not Alexis Castano.

#618820 Vladimir Mandić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Great cuts @Ttggfr ,also I wich to thank you for all previous cuts.I wasn't here as I used to,but many tnx anyway!

#618799 Matt Pilkington
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

That's not correct person.I'll do correct guy for next update.

#618795 Dudu Aouate
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 12 February 2021 - 15:50 PM UTC 

1 wrongly cut image out of thousands isn't too bad, no? I'll take those odds all day long. When cutting, I download sources directly from the main forum to save some time instead of accessing each person individually, which is why I hadn't spotted it. Mind you, it's actually dated still more recently (December 2012) than the present megapack cut (November 2012) so now I've cut it, we might as well retain it. Pity you didn't spot this a month ago when originally requested and only now that I've gone round to cutting it.

 

@julkjulk, please don't waste our time by making requests of images you've already been told previously aren't improvements. If you really want them to be cut, I've given you plenty of information and guidance on how you can do so yourself :thup: