Baja - Comments

Comments
#629719 Božidar Štulić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Great cuts @maalivahti thank you very much for them.Simply perfect work!

#629501 Boris Bunjak
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Will be requested from a lot better source.

#628899 Gennaro Gattuso
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

I'm really not sure I understand point of these cuts…great work,but they are not improvements.And here we're asking for improvements and missing images.

#628898 Joris Moutachy
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By 77david54 06 April 2021 - 20:05 PM UTC 

I corrected a little.

 

I'm affraid that's not good for an improvement.

#628731 Martín Ligüera
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@TiagoSeattle before uploading cuts please check them on dark background,since for example this one have white leftover on his head/hair.

#628730 Albur
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@hectorfg35 there's an source above yours and it looks perfectly for HQ cut.

#627557 Stefan Sekulić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons here's better one for him 👍

#625939 Mathías Riquero
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@Cristóbal Salazar Franchini when you have such a poor sources as this,please cut them 180x180,and a bit closer to the chin.

#625437 Francisco Coirolo
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Quality of cut is very poor and blur in comparing to the quality of source.Also,needs check up on dark background and cleaning up,since there's a lot of snow in the hair.

#625435 Diego Arismendi
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons this can't be considered as completed with such a poor cut from such a good sources.

#624601 James Sammut
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@tv_capper not bad,but pay attention how they look on dark background,it looks like he needs a bit more hair clean up/removing white shadow.

#624584 Franck Passi
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

9.07 version,just upsized.I don't understand a point in posting same cuts from time to time,only with changing size or even without it.

#623972 Nertil Ferraj
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 14 March 2021 - 13:36 PM UTC 

To avoid this kind of scenario, please use the deleted button only when the image requested is inappropriate (e.g. porn). Apart from the fact that deleting the image doesn't affect the actual megapack, it confuses matters, so in instances like this just tag me and let me take care of it; use the reject button if need be 😉

 

Like I've said that was my intention at the first place,but don't know that happened with my mice.

#623971 Cristian Gaitán
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

I saw that someone did some awful cut for this guy,wich is newer but quality is criminal.Here's great and recent source.

#623968 Nertil Ferraj
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons I've deleted this one by mistake.I wanted to reject it since that's not correct face for Nertil Ferraj that's Vladimir Siladji,Serbian player who already have correct face with correct UID.

#623963 Noel Sanvicente
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

That's just upsized 7.0 version.

#623947 Jonathan Cafu
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons Good cut,but his top of the hair/head is cut off.

I'm starting check up,since today I'm off my work.

#622420 Filip Žunić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons you've missed this one.

#622307 Jorge Nuñez
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@lorek007 very good cut,but pay attention on shadow.You have it on right side of his head/face,that must be removed.I'll fix it,but just small advice for the future.

#622030 Jakov Karabatić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 03 March 2021 - 11:35 AM UTC 

If it's downscaled and the noise reduced, then it could well be an acceptable cut, I think. If you find a better source, then it will definitely be much better but in the absence of that, we have to use what material we have. Not every single cut will be absolutely perfect, unfortunately, and there's nothing wrong in aiming for better, but sometimes you have to be practical and accept what you've got.

 

This is just one in big bunch of bad cuts,probably the worse.I've got a feeling that sometimes is simply a lot better not to have anything that something very bad.Over the weekend I'll send you report from last collection.Found the one and requested. 👍

#622027 Gjore Jovanovski
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
#622026 Saša Stevanović
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

Fantastic cut @Asket ,thank you! 😀

#622023 Jakov Karabatić
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons this kind of cuts are simply pointless.

#621728 John Nyikadzino
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@lorek007 not bad,but egdes should be smooth,these egdes are way too rough,like his head is ripped of background.

#621417 Restoration of the standard logos!
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By hammer9 17 February 2021 - 23:59 PM UTC 

 

 


@Baja
there you go. 🙂
 

Show Spoiler

https://i.ibb.co/F7B65Y7/Baja-restoration-logo.png

 

Great work mate! 😀 I've fixed some letters a bit,and it's original of original 😀

#621358 Cristian García
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By LFCYNWA 27 February 2021 - 16:12 PM UTC 

@Baja Respectfully, I think we have differing opinions of this particular cut. Per previous advice, I now submit 180x180 whenever I feel the cut warrants it, and in this case, I didn't.

 

If you crop just head from that source it's almost not enough for 180x180,so it's really hard to expect quality 250x250 cut.If you also add a fact that it's an action image cut,that looks simply bad as 250x250.Yesterday I resized more almost 100 cuts for next update.Good to know that you've noticed my advice.I'll re-cut this one from HQ source anyway.Keep up the good work,and when you have poor sources,you can always ask here for something better.

#621191 Cristian García
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@LFCYNWA what should I do to convince you to start making cuts of this quality as 180x180,damn it?!

#621078 Tiago Duarte
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657
By mons 26 February 2021 - 08:33 AM UTC 

Or we could be a bit more constructive and suggest that they are de-noised and downscaled so that they are usable in 180x180 😉

 

Sure.I'm sorry if I've sound harsh. 

I'm affraid that some of these are not even good for 180x180,such a shame.

#620952 Tiago Duarte
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@mons in the future we should really reject cuts as this because they are unrecognizable and useless.

#620949 Buda
Baja
16 years ago
1 day ago
36,657

@andr3 please cut images from such a poor sources as 180x180,not 250x since they look way too bad with that resolution.