mons - Comments

@Ben Petersen How large is the file you've downloaded? What program are you using to extract it?

Nothing is showing on the forum 😕

Which ones do you mean?

@Chodw118 Good cut, but please remember that we want all cuts to include a little bit of collar. At the same time, the ideal cut only contains 2-3 pixels beneath the chin. Since in some sources like this one, the person in the image may have a longer neck than usual, this would be quite difficult to achieve naturally.

I'll fix this one myself, but please keep it in mind for any future cuts you may do 👍

Here's a video of the process on how to nudge the collar upwards:

No sharper than the current cut and has no collar either

I would think so too, and it's probably the hair details which make it preferable. The other one is perfectly fine too, in fairness.

The current cut was uploaded just a few weeks ago and has better lighting, so this one isn't an improvement.

Noted, and will be sorted by the next update pack 🍻

Best to submit any images you may have via the upload image button too 👍

The second image, however, had no hair details at all.

This is how snow should be removed:

Got that 👍

@ritkollenos Good cut, but please remember that we want all cuts to include a little bit of collar. At the same time, the ideal cut only contains 2-3 pixels beneath the chin. Since in some sources like this one, the person in the image may have a longer neck than usual, this would be quite difficult to achieve naturally.

I'll fix this one myself, but please keep it in mind for any future cuts you may do 👍

Here's a video of the process on how to nudge the collar upwards:

Sorted 🍻

@Ghost77, we want our cuts to be cropped no more than 2-3 pixels beneath the chin, nudging the collar up when applicable. Since in some sources like this one, the person in the image may have a longer neck than usual, this would be quite difficult to achieve naturally.

I'll fix this one myself, but please keep it in mind for any future cuts you may do 👍

Here's a video of the process on how to nudge the collar upwards:

You might have a few extra images accummulated through the years, which will include duplicates, wrong assigned images or file names, etc., so that sounds about right.

@Дмитрий Воробьев these are game ready and should have been uploaded as such and not as source 👍

Best to give us the original source without the background removed.

@xXxIVOxXx , for future reference, when you have a lot of images to upload, then you should upload them as a pack instead of individually and save the both of us some time.

You can also upload up to 50 images per pack instead of just a maximum of 4 when done individually.

@theo714, I'm tired of asking you to follow the guidelines. Do you even read these messages? I'm tagging you for a reason. If you don't reply in the next few days, I'll take it that you have no interest in remaining a member on these forums and will ban your account accordingly.

Follow these steps.

@Donjai#0216, if the source image isn't large enough or of good enough quality, then it should be cut in 180x180. Also, avoid using image enlarging software because it results in images which look like early 2000's video-game graphics rather than an image of an actual human being.

@W74, why are you uploading the same cut-out already uploaded before? This will be added in the next update pack, so there's no need to upload it again every day until then.

Not a bad cut @Geeor, but the current cut is essentially similar and much sharper, so the new cut isn't an improvement. Do take the time to check a person's current cut before deciding whether it's worthwhile to cut a new image for them in the future, in order to avoid situations such as this 😉

@superawr, a quick Google Image search found larger equivalents of the same image. You should make sure to upload the largest available image possible instead of the first thumbnail you find.

All should be sorted on the right timeline and for future update packs.

I've no idea how you're spotting these, but I'm grateful you are 🍻

@Jordi Blake, I have no idea how you have ended up with two faces folders.

The easiest thing is to delete both of them, and extract the rar again.

Screenshots would help, but my suggestion would be to delete all the faces you have and either download the 2024.0 base pack from scratch or extract the rar file again if it's still on your hard disk.

Cut just a few weeks ago, so doesn't need to be done again.

@PavelT, please be a bit more careful when uploading images.

Murray Moore liked a LinkedIn post by Dr David Akbiu, and for some reason the Google algorithm shows the second person's photo when you search for the first person's name.

Did you even read what the original poster said, or what I replied? This is not a mod, but a description of an issue that was wrongly created as a download 😕

If you don't @ me or another staff member, posts like this will almost certainly be missed given how fast the forum moves.

Also, going by your post history, you've spotted several data issues. The official FM data is SI's and we don't have anything to do with it. If you want to propose changes for future FM versions, you should post in the respective forum here.

Current cut is only a few months old, so this doesn't need to be cut again.