@D_i_M_o_N @mons

Thanks and the issue with snow is pretty much the same.

You may also want to tune the RGB of the cut as it seems a bit bluish, just like the source pic, it may need a bit of tuning as well.

#624450 Pema Rinchen

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

17 Mar 2021 10:05:08

@D_i_M_o_N @mons

Thanks for the cut, but it seems like it needs a bit of fixing as the snow seems kinda obvious?

#624191 Oliver Maher

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

15 Mar 2021 16:19:41

How about you post the linkedin profile of the staff members here so that we can find someone to get the full sized picture of the staff required?

@mons and for some reason I cannot tag Malik (the guy who posted the source)

https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliver-maher-878473184/zh-tw?trk=people-guest_people_search-card

#624153 Tom Stratful

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

15 Mar 2021 12:45:37

@weeniehutjr

https://uk.linkedin.com/in/tom-stratful-42368948

Seems like this is from linkedin as well so mind helping us to look for the full size photo?

#624147 Paul Quilter

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

15 Mar 2021 12:14:17

@mons

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-quilter-05043830/zh-tw?trk=people-guest_people_search-card

not sure if his full pic in his linkedin will do well enough, mind helping me out?

#623732 Nasser Djiga

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

13 Mar 2021 03:38:34

@Parker26 middle?

#623728 Abidal Traoré

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

13 Mar 2021 02:55:04

By 77david54 12 March 2021 - 23:55 PM UTC

@mons
I enlarged the image to be able to cut it , i know that it does not improve the quality. I am of the same opinion as @Ttggfr . The staff should refuse this kind of source. The source of @yayazo , we have the impression that the photo has gone through the washing machine.
This only commits me but i have the impression that there are fewer and fewer people to cut off the sources on hold. We should perhaps ask ourselves why ?
In two months , i won't be surprised if we have 800 pending sources. Some will be complete but will not be cut.
Personally , i think only the staff should be able to download a source pack. Site users should be limited to 10 sources. This encourages to look for better sources because we know that we are limited in number of sources. This rule would increase the quality of the proposed sources. It also encourages learning to cut. If i had known that we could download image packs , i would have offered 500 images in several packs , and above all i would never have learned to cut.

Yet another debate lmao

Sometimes I feel like we are doing the cuts only for the sake of it. I hold a strong opinion that sources like this should be rejected as I consider even the 180x180 cut is not good enough. Too blurry for me. If even this kind of sources can be accepted then what is the point of even limited the size to 180x180 in the first place? I thought it was to ensure some quality? If the source is not of quality, I would rather leave it blank than to force a pixelated cut.

Kind of missing the days that a Serbian would come and find a better source or just saying that this source is too poor and forcefully shove a guideline on finding the best source down your throat. If he returns I doubt such bad source would be accepted by him.

#623726 Nazarii Vorobchak

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

13 Mar 2021 02:44:35

LOL no wonder I got tagged multiple times, seems like you guys are having a debate over whether a source should be in 250x250 or 180x180.

IMO, unless the area of the face is like 24()x24(), otherwise I would not have forced it to 250x250, as it would otherwise make the cut blurry. Unless I can optimize and ensure that the face does not look like my Japnese 18+, otherwise I would not enlarge the pic and make it lose its quality.

As for the cuts, I believe that whether it is 250x250 or 180x180 is not that much of an importance, as long as the source is more recent then I would cut it upon request unless it is rejected.

#623615 Abidal Traoré

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

12 Mar 2021 17:17:23

@yayazo @mons

This source was forcefully enlarged, and the original is 100x122

From here: https://www.playmakerstats.com/player.php?id=749211

We are not magicians who can optimize every photo and generate a cut, if I have this ability I will definitely charge for it instead of doing it for free.

Admin please reject this source

#623608 Garrison Draper

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

12 Mar 2021 17:03:57

@cbou Please select the best source available next time, not everyone will be willing to do the extra research

#623208 Choki Wangchuk

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

10 Mar 2021 04:45:50

@mons It should be source, my mistake

#623207 Amin Cherni

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

10 Mar 2021 03:20:25

By 77david54 09 March 2021 - 19:33 PM UTC

You're too nice , i would have rejected the source so that the guy would do a little research.

That was assuming that the guy is hardworking and willing to do the research, but unfortunately that usually is not the case. Either the same source would be uploaded or no further updates to be provided by the same person following the rejection.

#623127 Amin Cherni

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

09 Mar 2021 16:57:36

By 77david54 09 March 2021 - 15:45 PM UTC

Please , reject , this image is on April 2016.

I personally would suggest this as a temporary solution until someone provided an updated source?

#623081 Picioni

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

09 Mar 2021 13:48:43

@mons the same source that you had cut it from

#622612 Édgo

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

06 Mar 2021 13:19:03

@mons I would rather leave the cut empty tbh, it was too small to begin with

#622610 Image finder thread - assistance in finding a source image

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

06 Mar 2021 13:11:35

This is more of a reverse image search as I have a cut that I got the wrong ID here.

But since moving to the new site there are some cuts that I made cannot be found anymore so therefore I am asking here.

I believe it is from one of the Eastern European regions

Attachments

900211.png (73.1 KiB)

#622583 Sahal Abdul Samad

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

06 Mar 2021 10:09:24

@mons

Same here, cut from a source that is of no difference but the background (one is white and the other being grey)

#622582 Bilal Khan

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

06 Mar 2021 10:07:47

@mons literally the same source that I used to cut it from so I guess it is completed instead of in progress?

#622567 Marcello Mularoni

Ttggfr

9 years ago

7 hours ago

11,373

06 Mar 2021 07:14:00

By mons 18 February 2020 - 16:53 PM UTC

Looks great - feel free to upload it

If you @ me when you'd like feedback, I get a notification and I may be able to answer a little bit more quicker

@mons Is it just this one or the records had been messed up when we move from the old site to the new site?
While sources and/or cuts that were submitted by me got labeled as submitted by someone else (like this one), and vice versa.
Therefore when I am using the current site it seems like I cannot find all of my previous works due to this bug?