Ninja
14 years ago
6 years ago
5,341
They're not though, because Sturridge always looked like a greedy striker who was going to score goals.

Welbeck doesn't. He's a decent player but nothing much. Sturridge is closing in on world class.


Revisionist nonsense. Sturridge was talented, no doubt, but until he left to join Liverpool he was a player who struggled with the lack of opportunities and never looked entirely convincing when asked to play wider (although was a damn sight better at it than Welbeck, who is hopeless out 90% of the time).

It's only when Sturridge moved, and got the chance to play week in week out -and boy did he grab that chance- that he looked like a genuinely excellent footballer, but lets not go too far; Liverpool took a bit of a gamble on him and it spectacularly paid off,.

I have no interest in debating whether Welbeck is a better player or not, which he obviously currently isn't, or who will have the better career, as I think you seem to think that I want to.

Just the simple point that Sturridge was no world beater until he got a consistent chance at first team football in a team that was playing well in his favoured position; Welbeck has had 2 of those 3 things this season (for 7 games) and scored 5 goals in that time in a team that is shit. Dismissing him as 'horrific' is ( for a start, indicative of really unfortunate or really selective watching) completely unfair to a player thats done rather well.

It's ironic in a way that Danny Welbeck's form around the turn of the year was superb, if you're picking players on form then he definitely deserves his place, although he's had his opportunities limited by Moyes' invertebrate nature since RVP and Rooney's return (despite Rooney being shit, but that another discussion).

I guess the hue and cry for managers to pick 'on form' means actually 'to pick fashionable players from small clubs'.
Poe
17 years ago
3 days ago
3,675
Not really, I just don't think he deserves to play for England based on his performances this year, same with Smalling and Cleverley.

He's picked him because he's an absolute grafter and will help out in defence. He's probably good to bring on if we're winning 2-1 to protect the lead, so fair enough.

I'd run with this lineup in the World Cup

GK - Hart

DR - Johnson
DC - Cahill
DC - Jagielka
DL - Baines

MC - Gerrard
MC - Henderson/Carrick

AMR - Oxlade-Chamberlain
AML - Raheem Sterling

CF - Rooney
ST - Sturridge
Ninja
14 years ago
6 years ago
5,341
Not really, I just don't think he deserves to play for England based on his performances this year, same with Smalling and Cleverley.


Im going to guess you don't watch our games that often.

Because seriously, chucking him in with Cleverley is down right stupid and secondly, Carrick has been so bad that he'd be very, very fortunate to go to Brazil.
rossiheslopi
15 years ago
4 years ago
669
People saying Sturridge only showed his true ability when he got to Liverpool need to remember that when he had that loan spell at Bolton he also had a good record (8 in 12) so basically anytime he's been used as a striker he's shown what he can do, it just seems every manager at Chelsea misused him quite badly
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
Hart
Johnson - Cahill - Jagielka - Baines
Gerrard - Wilshere
Sterling - Rooney - AOC
Sturridge

That's how I would set up for the World Cup.
Slashman X
17 years ago
4 months ago
6,000
Premium
Barry would be perfect instead of Wilshere

Although Gerrard's new role might suit Wilshere with him doing Henderson's job
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
Barry would be perfect instead of Wilshere

Although Gerrard's new role might suit Wilshere with him doing Henderson's job

I think Gerrard-Wilshere should be our first-choice midfield going into the World Cup as I feel they compliment each other well, and perhaps in the long-term we could start to see Henderson edge out Gerrard.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
This thread

Full of hate rivalry and bias. VP hates Townsend because he plays for Tottenham, so he's overrated, assumes because 3 players play for Man United then they're automatically selected, then the Liverpool fan who says Play Gerrard, Henderson and Sterling with a good defence behind them and we'll be "grand" not forgetting the Newcastle fan hating on Adam Johnson because he plays for Sunderland \o/



You backed up your opinions there, well done.


And as for the team, even though Ox is the only name that comes to mind, im not quite sure on him yet. Whats the alternatives?
Jason
17 years ago
2 months ago
4,635
You backed up your opinions there, well done.


If we'll be "grand" with 3 Liverpool players in the squad, especially then we've no hope.

Hope he takes Luke Shaw and Leighton Baines to the WC over Ashley Cole though.
Jason
17 years ago
2 months ago
4,635
That's how I would set up for the World Cup.


Swap Wilshere for Barry imo.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
Swap Wilshere for Barry imo.

I think Gerrard-Barry is too defensive - both work well in deeper roles but aren't going to drive forward and cause the opposition problems. Wilshere can offer that and I want to see us go for it this tournament as opposed to playing it safe and losing anyway.
VP.
13 years ago
4 weeks ago
25,271
This thread

Full of hate rivalry and bias. VP hates Townsend because he plays for Tottenham, so he's overrated, assumes because 3 players play for Man United then they're automatically selected, then the Liverpool fan who says Play Gerrard, Henderson and Sterling with a good defence behind them and we'll be "grand" not forgetting the Newcastle fan hating on Adam Johnson because he plays for Sunderland \o/



So are you saying that you don't believe that a vast majority of players get picked not because of how they are playing, but simply because of who they play for?

And Andros Townsend is shite ffs, if he's the quality of player we're going to be relying on at a World Cup then we might a well not bother going. All he does is dribble into nowhere and shoot from everywhere and will be found out in minutes against the worlds best He may have looked good at QPR last season, but that was simply because more than half the side didn't give a shit and just wanted the massive wages. This season he has just one assist and one goal in the 21 appearances he's made (7 as sub), granted he's been injured in the middle of that but its hardly the kind of figures i'd expect from someone rated so highly.


Nah Vp probably hates Townsend because he's fucking awful.


Glad i'm not the only one that believes this.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
Townsend pretty much guaranteed his seat on the plane after those two good performances in the qualifiers.
BR.
17 years ago
2 years ago
1,896
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
If we'll be "grand" with 3 Liverpool players in the squad, especially then we've no hope.

Hope he takes Luke Shaw and Leighton Baines to the WC over Ashley Cole though.


Those 3 Liverpool players have been amongst the best in the league you moron
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
And Luke Shaw isn't very good.
Ninja
14 years ago
6 years ago
5,341
So are you saying that you don't believe that a vast majority of players get picked not because of how they are playing, but simply because of who they play for?


yeah, you play for Southampton and you get picked.

I'm not saying that those players necessairily don't deserve it, but its a massive case of Hodgson pandering to the gallery by picking a bunch of players who play for a very fashionable club.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
It's a shame that Kieran Gibbs plays in such a stocked position because he's been superb for us this season and I think he deserves more of a look in. Now that Ashley Cole is on his way out people seem to have already assumed Luke Shaw will be the de facto back-up to Leighton Baines whereas at this moment in time I'd prefer Gibbs.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
I'd have Danny Rose in there as well. I've heard he hasn't played very well this season but he was very good last year, certainly ahead of Shaw.

So much of Shaw being totally unable to defend gets overlooked on account of him being 12 and playing for Southampton.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
I'd have Danny Rose in there as well. I've heard he hasn't played very well this season but he was very good last year, certainly ahead of Shaw.

So much of Shaw being totally unable to defend gets overlooked on account of him being 12 and playing for Southampton.

No way, Rose is poor. Most Spurs fans want a new left-back in the summer and regret letting BAE go.

Baines, Gibbs, Cole and Shaw should all be ahead of him in the pecking order.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
BAE is awful.

Rose has apparently only played 4 times for Spurs this season according to wiki?
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
BAE is awful.

Rose has apparently only played 4 times for Spurs this season according to wiki?


That's because he's abysmal.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
Nevermind he's played 13 games.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
I know BAE isn't good, but that only highlights how bad Rose is when you consider that plenty of Spurs fans would prefer him in the side.
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
If you wouldn't select Shaw because he (supposedly) can't defend, the fact that you would suggest Danny Rose is utterly bemusing.
.verse
12 years ago
4 months ago
871
People saying Sturridge only showed his true ability when he got to Liverpool need to remember that when he had that loan spell at Bolton he also had a good record (8 in 12) so basically anytime he's been used as a striker he's shown what he can do, it just seems every manager at Chelsea misused him quite badly

Sturridge as a lone striker doesn't really work, this is the main reason why he was always used out wide by every manager that had him at Chelsea. He's average in the air, lacks the work rate and team work to have excelled as a lone striker- this is still shown with his Liverpool move, as Suarez does most of the hard graft. However, in a system that employs two strikers that can interchange together it plays more to his strengths. He's always been a good finisher though.

Will be interesting to see how well he does for England though without Suarez around him, and within a system that won't be as free-flowing at what Rodgers likes to employ.
hammer9
16 years ago
1 month ago
94,628
I rather Wilshere & Noble over Barry and Cleverley
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
Sturridge as a lone striker doesn't really work, this is the main reason why he was always used out wide by every manager that had him at Chelsea. He's average in the air, lacks the work rate and team work to have excelled as a lone striker- this is still shown with his Liverpool move, as Suarez does most of the hard graft. However, in a system that employs two strikers that can interchange together it plays more to his strengths. He's always been a good finisher though.

Will be interesting to see how well he does for England though without Suarez around him, and within a system that won't be as free-flowing at what Rodgers likes to employ.


Suarez was banned at the start of the season.. and when he came back Sturridge was still in the striker role, think we have only played 2 up front once or twice this season
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
Also half a serious suggestion here.. Jon Flanagan? The lads been as good as anyone at right back. Actually wondering how Glen Johnson got a call up considering hes just back from injury
VP.
13 years ago
4 weeks ago
25,271
Also half a serious suggestion here.. Jon Flanagan? The lads been as good as anyone at right back. Actually wondering how Glen Johnson got a call up considering hes just back from injury


Like Paul Merson said yesterday, it's harder to get out of the England squad than it is to get in now and players simply don't get picked anymore through form. That might not actually make much sense but i do know what he means

You'll need to Login to comment