Win a copy of FM24 in our Prediction League. Prizes are given out to the best predictor each month, so you have multiple chances to win.


Vercoe
11 years ago
3 years ago
1,510
I can't understand why some morons would abuse a poor woman for being raped, so much so, that she has to change her name and move. People are idiots.
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
Isn't he still in the process of appealing his conviction, what happens if its overturned?
Flash.
17 years ago
11 months ago
677
Premium
The point of jail isn't just to keep people locked away, it's to rehabilitate them and introduce them back into society.

The fact that the government and others have basically made it impossible for him to get a job shows the system is wrong.

Also, the case is so massively filled with holes I'm not fully convinced he actually did it. I've been in the jury for a rape case and you'd be amazed how many people wanted them found guilty regardless of the fact there was so little/no evidence. The UK has a massive culture of thinking 'They've been accused of something, so they must be guilty'.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
The woman has had to change her identity, she had to leave her home. After her name was released publicly she got so much abuse, she can never live her life normally again.

He hasn't even apologised, whether people like it or not footballers are role models, and he's an unapologetic convicted rapist allowed to continue with his life normally. Whereas that poor woman's life has been damaged irreparably.


Of course he is, because he doesn't think he has done anything wrong and is appealing the conviction. Why on earth would anybody apologise if thats how you feel?

Also, the picture you're painting of the woman is not as simple as you're making out, bear in mind this is a woman tweeting about what she would do with the money 'when she wins big'. Nor does the fact that 'she got abuse' have any impact on it, Evans can't control other peoples actions on twitter and shouldn't be vindicated for what some other low lifes tweet.

At any rate, the morality of the argument is retarded. Whether Evans did or didn't do it is an irrelevancy now, he has served his time and should be allowed to rejoin society. Whether he is a 'role model' or not can't be a factor because its unquantifiable.
Sam
17 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
He admitted to having sex with her, she was too drunk to give consent. That is rape. His previous two appeals have been rejected so I'd be surprised if this next one isn't. He was found guilty, unless he's found innocent he shouldn't be allowed to play football. He's a convicted rapist and has shown no remorse.

She can't carry on with her life like normal - yet he can. He can continue to be a footballer, footballers are role models to a lot of young people, and earn about £20k a week. What kind of message is that sending out? He can go back to his old life as if nothing happened yet his victim can't.

It doesn't matter what she tweeted or who sent her abuse - it's all because of his actions.

By the way, he didn't even serve his time, he got an early release.
The Platypus
13 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Well, he can't REALLY return to his life as if nothing happened, considering he's been branded a rapist.

He very well might BE a rapist... But sure.
Jason
17 years ago
2 months ago
4,635
She was too drunk to give consent to Evans, yet she gave consent to McDonald, but wasn't too drunk to say yes to him? Why wouldn't they allow the tweets to be shown in court?

She also accused two rugby players of rape two years previous, but it never got to court as they paid her money. There are reports that she asked Sheffield United for 250,000 to drop the case, obviously there's no source but that's whats been branded about before.

The case defiantly has holes in it, this ones just a case of your own opinion on the thing, but there will be a lot of apologies needed if the appeal is successful.

http://chedevans.com is a good read, if you've not already read it, gives an in site into what may of happened that night, twitter posts are on there too.

Titus Brambles (who was accused of raped but never convicted) name was mentioned in the official police interview with MCDonald, and the documents have been posted here;
http://chedevans.com/the-police-major-incident-room-notebook

An account of what happened in court, the "victims" actions in court etc is here;
http://chedevans.com/the-trial

Im on the fence, he could of done it. But i believe he should be able to return to work, instead of our taxes funding his life.
Jason
17 years ago
2 months ago
4,635
Well, he can't REALLY return to his life as if nothing happened, considering he's been branded a rapist.

He very well might BE a rapist... But sure.


Nobody said he would be able to return as if nothing happened.

He will get stick from opposition etc, but he should still be able to return to "work".
Jason
17 years ago
2 months ago
4,635
It doesn't matter what she tweeted or who sent her abuse - it's all because of his actions.


Is it though? If i'm a footballer on 20k a week and im in a bar and im noticed by a blonde who wants some "fun" and i end up consently having sex with her, she then wakes up the next morning regrets it and then says i raped her, knows i have money and tweets about how shes gonna buy a pink mini for 30k for her and her friend when she "wins big".

Is that all because of my actions? If she agreed to sex, it isn't rape. Rape is a very hard thing to judge in a court, and even when people are found to have made rape stories up, they never get as bad as what a rapist would anyway.
The Platypus
13 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Nobody said he would be able to return as if nothing happened.

He will get stick from opposition etc, but he should still be able to return to "work".


You don't think people out in the world treat you differently when you're a famous convicted rapist?
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
She never actually made a complaint of rape btw, it was the police who made it such after they interviewed Evans and the other fella
Crane
14 years ago
3 days ago
2,432
Premium
Wonder if Oldham had to deal with this much fuss when they signed a murderer a few years back.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Didn't she basically tell him to go down on her? That's what confuses me the most
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
Didn't she basically tell him to go down on her? That's what confuses me the most


Yes, but she was too drunk and therefore couldn't give her consent.

Personally, I think thats pretty weird that thats a legal basis for convicting someone of rape.

I've had the opposite happen to me, and I'm sure a lot of others have to, where I've been blackout drunk with no recollection of the night before next to an absolute train wreck of a girl that I'd never normally sleep with. I guess I'm technically a rape victim in the eyes of the law.
Sam
17 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
This article sums it up very well. Rehabilitation is about reintegration into society. Someone who rapes someone and refuses to acknowledge it's wrong isn't rehabilitated.

The jury found him guilty, without any doubt, they concluded based on all the evidence that she was too drunk to give consent.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
That is literally the biggest aids of a article I have seen in a while
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
This article sums it up very well. Rehabilitation is about reintegration into society. Someone who rapes someone and refuses to acknowledge it's wrong isn't rehabilitated.

The jury found him guilty, without any doubt, they concluded based on all the evidence that she was too drunk to give consent.


How on the one hand can you agree with the argument 'Evans is a rapist because the justice system is infallible and he was found guilty' and on the other hand argue that he should not be allowed to re-enter society because the justice system has released a man who can't, or shouldn't be, rehabilitated?

It's actually an incredibly boring debate, I'm sure normally when we have these public debates about things like this people actually bother to educate themselves about the case and make some argument based on the merits of what the person did or didn't do. Like the Pistorius trial, for example. All we've really had here is people screaming 'HE'S A RAPIST BECAUSE HE WAS CONVICTED' and 'FOOTBALLERS ARE ROLE MODELS' ad nauseum.
Sam
17 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
Can I ask why?
Sam
17 years ago
1 year ago
5,092
I really can't understand why this is a debate. He's a convicted rapist, found guilty by a jury who have seen all the evidence, it's amazing that people are trying to defend a convicted rapist believing they know more than all the jury who found him guilty.

I can't be bothered to carry on repeating myself.
Vercoe
11 years ago
3 years ago
1,510
I saw a funny tweet earlier that said something like "I think footballers are role models. I always thought that killing someone was wrong. But then Lee Hughes did it and he scores goals. So now I think it's okay", laced extremely heavily with sarcasm and just made me laugh.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
I really can't understand why this is a debate. He's a convicted rapist, found guilty by a jury who have seen all the evidence, it's amazing that people are trying to defend a convicted rapist believing they know more than all the jury who found him guilty.

I can't be bothered to carry on repeating myself.


It's a debate worth having because it's extremely odd that one of the lads was convicted and the other not considering they've both had sex with the same woman and the basis of convicting one was she was to intoxicated to give consent. You do realise juries get these things wrong? That's exactly why there's an appeal process, which is handled by judges iirc.
Franck
17 years ago
4 weeks ago
4,255
There's definitely cause for debate, but it's entirely irrelevant as to whether a football club should employ Ched Evans or not. The reality is that he is a convicted rapist, any prospective employer has to make decisions based on that reality, regardless of any perceived holes in the conviction. Guilt or innocence are matters for the courts to decide, not football clubs.

As a fan, I would never want Ched Evans playing for my football club.
ianbaker
12 years ago
7 years ago
762
To those who are saying hes served his time etc etc. He hasnt. He's been released from prison on license, so is still technically serving his sentence, just under supervision of a probation officer. If he does anything, even 5/10 minutes late for a meeting with his PO, then he can be recalled to prison to serve his sentence in the comfort of a cell, being bullied by hardened criminals.

Also, he's showed no remorse, whereas Lee Hughes and McCormick did. Surely he would have an agent clever enough to tell him to show remorse and not comment further regardless of how he felt personally in the interest of his career. Instead his made it a witch hunt on this girl whos had to change her identity 4/5 times.
Franck
17 years ago
4 weeks ago
4,255
Hughes and McCormick also committed crimes of negligence, while their crimes had a deadly outcome, they did not have any criminal intent. Rape on the other hand is a crime that requires criminal intent.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
If she was too drunk to give consent to Chad, who was second, how was she not to drunk for Clayton?
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
To those who are saying hes served his time etc etc. He hasnt. He's been released from prison on license, so is still technically serving his sentence, just under supervision of a probation officer. If he does anything, even 5/10 minutes late for a meeting with his PO, then he can be recalled to prison to serve his sentence in the comfort of a cell, being bullied by hardened criminals.

Also, he's showed no remorse, whereas Lee Hughes and McCormick did. Surely he would have an agent clever enough to tell him to show remorse and not comment further regardless of how he felt personally in the interest of his career. Instead his made it a witch hunt on this girl whos had to change her identity 4/5 times.


If it was me and I knew I was innocent, I wouldn't be apologising at all. I'm not saying he's innocent either, just to clear that up. It's just very strange that one person was put away for it and another acquitted, that bit I don't understand.
ianbaker
12 years ago
7 years ago
762
If she was too drunk to give consent to Chad, who was second, how was she not to drunk for Clayton?

Claytons lawyers argued that because she remembered going in the taxi and up to the hotel room with Clayton that this was her effectively giving consent for sex.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Also, he's showed no remorse, whereas Lee Hughes and McCormick did. Surely he would have an agent clever enough to tell him to show remorse and not comment further regardless of how he felt personally in the interest of his career. Instead his made it a witch hunt on this girl whos had to change her identity 4/5 times.


Any lawyer clever enough (or any person with a tiny bit of logic) would not advise him show remorse for something that he is saying he was wrongfully conflicted of and is currently appealing. Also, he didn't exactly start the witch hunt, dopes on Twitter did (of which the victim is one)
Tommo.
12 years ago
1 year ago
2,272
We should possibly move this to its own thread seeing as theres lots of discussion and its got this one off topic?
Number 1
16 years ago
11 months ago
3,650
Evans is certainly worth its own thread. There's a lot of comment on both sides.

For the record, I don't have strong views and do understand both sides, but I do wish the people supporting him stop hounding the victim. I've read somewhere she's had to move and change her identity five times because that website supporting his innocence keeps doing revealing the new ones. Presumably that's a possible contempt of court charge in waiting.

You'll need to Login to comment