Home
Blog
Careers
Forums
Downloads
FM24 Real Name Fix
FM23 Real Name Fix
FM24 New Leagues
FM23 New Leagues
FM24 Tactics
FM24 Data Update
FM Database
FM Guides
FM Shortlists
FM24/25 Update Wonderkids
FM24/25 Update Free Players
FM24/25 Update Bargains
FM24/25 Update Players to avoid
FM24/25 Update Club Budgets
FM24/25 Update Club Facilities
Graphics
Installation Guides
Records
Prediction League
Fantasy Football
Search
.verse
You find more strikers in the world who kick their 10-15 a season than those who get 30+ regularly, I assure you. Any striker who has consistently kicked 30+ a season is going to cost you ridiculous amounts of money, provided their not already at a top club as it is. Signing two strikers who can get you 10-15 goals a season to work with Torres is going to be both cheaper and also less riskier.
Don't get me wrong, I'd love either a Falcao or Cavani at Chelsea, both are top strikers. But I'd also be just as happy to see the club keep Torres and add some genuine competitive depth, which is lacking. Chelsea's track record on buying expensive strikers isn't good, so it makes just as much sense get two good players for the price of one superstar.
Chelsea were spoiled to have a player like Drogba, who was near on the complete striker.
jumberto
Chelsea have only played 19 league games.
I know you don't like him but at least beat him with facts.
K3V0
I just had to do it.
chokosc
But if you get two strikers that can get 10-15, they wouldn't want to be played as a substitute... And we can't go with a 3 striker formation not with the players we have now and the players that we have. Can you really drop two of Mata, Oscar or Hazard? Not really. And last year proved that Torres can't handle competition. Now he has no competition, he doesn't have to play at his best because he is our only striker. But he didn't start very well and I don't believe that if we bring Ba now and when Lukaku comes back next season, that Torres will be able to do much.
Sadly, he just isn't the player we need. I admitted it a long time ago and I personally think we should have got rid of him last year. He was destroyed in 2010 and sadly he will never be back. Again, it was always hard for me to like Torres, just like it is hard for me to like Benitez. Both came from Liverpool and both had shit starts to their Chelsea career (Rafa got the hang of it faster). I will never feel like I am 100% behind Torres but he has to prove himself first. If he scores over 15, 20 goals, let him stay, maybe he will be able to keep that form... Sadly, I can't see it happening and I have a feeling that if Lampard doesn't leave in January, Torres, yet again, will score less goals than him in the league.
True, I forgot that we are one game behind! Steal, doesn't make it that much better.
Franck
VP.
hammer9
Dutton
jumberto
Me too.
Eric Portapotty
K3V0
chokosc
Flash.
chokosc
Telegram Sam
He's a legend at Chelsea - moving to United would jeopardise that, obviously.
Dutton
Can't see it happening anyway.
Telegram Sam
Hmm, I suppose. If were to move to United, it certainly wouldn't sever his ties with Chelsea in the same way van Persie has with Arsenal, but it would certainly lose him a few admirers. Can you imagine if next season United and Chelsea were neck and neck in the title race, and Lampard hit a rich vein of form that helped United to the title? I can't imagine Chelsea fans being so forgiving them. He's played for them for almost his entire career so I'm sure he'll be very wary not to damage his reputation with the fans.
I still think he'll end up in LA but it'd be nice to see him show some ambition and move to someone like Lazio.
chokosc
You are probably one of our biggest, if not the biggest. Whenever we play you it feels different to any other game against any of the top teams (Arsenal, Spurs, City, Everton, Liverpool...).
I don't understand why we are letting him go. He is already on 6 goals this season and probably on the way to a ninth consecutive season with over ten goals in the league. I think he should stay here.
Telegram Sam
om4ever
He is being nothing but absolute class for Chelsea for over a decade. Hands down the greatest player in the modern history of the club.
He stood by every manager (even Scolari) bar AVB who was (and still is, see the GK mess earlier this season with Tottenham) atrocious at managing a group.
And now the club won't even OFFER him a contract ? How in hell could the fans be mad at him ? What is he supposed to do, stay with Chelsea without a contract ?
This is very different from the RVP situation. He was offered a new contract by Arsenal, which he refused
Tenth
He just hit his SIXTEENTH consecutive season with 5+ goals in the league.
Telegram Sam
I said it was different.
.verse
That's completely untrue. It's all about rotation. Every top side has around 3-4 strikers, usually of decent quality. United don't seem to have problems keeping their strikers happy, etc. Chelsea don't need to play 3 strikers in the one side, it's about a good rotation policy and obtaining the right sort of player for the role required within the side. It has nothing to do with our attacking midfield options.
I have no issue with Torres or Benitez having Liverpool backgrounds, that's irrelevant to me now because they're both at Chelsea and I want both to do well for the club, it's also largely irrelevant to this discussion about needing more strikers. I'm all for signing Ba and another striker of a similar statue, even if it's a loan deal to cover the short term. Then come the summer the club decides what it wants to do. That said, I don't see Chelsea signing a big name striker in January. It makes absolutely no sense.
Number 1
At least by moving quickly there's no threat of it being like the Andy Carroll farce.
Poe
Good luck to him, hope he actually gets his game and they don't ruin him as he's a real talent.
Number 1
As for new strikers, there's speculation that a deal for Loic Remy is going to be done after we complete the Debuchy move.
rossiheslopi
KEZ_7
King Luis
Dutton
rossiheslopi