@lele298 Did you have a look at my last comment. It would help you get even better cut. This cut does not seem to have collar.

Great, although it would be best to make the cut closer to the chin. You only need a couple of pixels on the collar. That way you get the highest quality on the cut.

Something like this:

this one aswell

Current photo is good imo, and not very old

just realized i did it a missing request as well

The source images from the Juve website also have quite a bit of snow in the background (parts of the background that weren't properly removed), so just cropping and resizing them isn't enough to be improvements over the current cutouts. @mons

@Kirill Osokin, good work with your recent cuts but it might be worth having a look at our tutorial and guidelines to cutters thread before making any more cuts.

This way, you can see that all cuts need to have a collar, and how to deal with sources where the neck is long or the source is lower. You will also see that it's better that a source is rotated if the person is tilting to one side like this source.

It doesn't seem to be the case in this pack, but your other pack yesterday often contained a very big gap between the bottom of the chin/facial hair and the bottom of the cut-out, where we look for a gap of only about 2-3 pixels so that the focus of the cut-out is the face.

Finally, do keep in mind what the current cut-out looks like when deciding whether it's worth cutting a source or not, since the current megapack image is from the same source and of a very good quality already 👍