AFC
16 years ago
8 years ago
186
Appeal to overturn Giroud's red card has been rejected, don't see how it was any different to Kompany's red card against us that was overturned. FA baffle me sometimes.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 day ago
3,322
Good riddance tbh, he's about as blunt an attacking force as Squillaci on current form.

Assuming he's not still carrying a knock, I'd like to see Podolski start up front.
rossiheslopi
15 years ago
4 years ago
669
Top banter by Evra
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
By AFC | Permalink | On 23 April 2013 - 16:18 PM
Appeal to overturn Giroud's red card has been rejected, don't see how it was any different to Kompany's red card against us that was overturned. FA baffle me sometimes.

I don't think Giroud's tackle was particularly bad, but I suppose you could argue he could have done some damage and that he lost control of his body in a manner that could have caused injury, which are both valid reasons for not overturning the decision. He's a tad unlucky, but it seems understandable.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
King Luis
17 years ago
2 months ago
3,111
Seems abit excessive, when you consider that Barton got 12 match ban for 3 counts of violent conduct. Ah well, wouldn't surprise me if he was gone in the summer anyway.
JCash3000
11 years ago
10 years ago
353
Jamieandhisego
17 years ago
1 year ago
841
By King Luis | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:03 PM
Seems abit excessive, when you consider that Barton got 12 match ban for 3 counts of violent conduct. Ah well, wouldn't surprise me if he was gone in the summer anyway.


Suarez has more than enough counts on his rap sheet.
Crane
14 years ago
3 days ago
2,432
Premium
LFC managing director Ian Ayre said: "Both the club and player are shocked and disappointed at the severity of today's Independent Regulatory Commission decision.

"We await the written reasons tomorrow before making any further comment."
King Luis
17 years ago
2 months ago
3,111
By Jaygull | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:05 PM
Suarez has more than enough counts on his rap sheet.

Doesn't mean this ban isn't a massive overreaction, you'll no doubt say different but to treat it any different to a player punching someone is just silly.

Also i don't know what the FA base any of their bans on its just plain odd, seems like they just pluck numbers out of the air and say yeah that'll do. Must be some sort of consistency surely?
rossiheslopi
15 years ago
4 years ago
669
I expected a decent length ban but think 10 is excessive, personally would have thought it'd be about 6 tbh. Especially considering previous bans for other offences, i.e only an 8 game ban for Ben Thatcher almost killing Pedro Mendes, and Defoe only getting a yellow card and nothing else for biting Mascherano
Tommo.
12 years ago
1 year ago
2,272
By rossiheslopi | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:19 PM
I expected a decent length ban but think 10 is excessive, personally would have thought it'd be about 6 tbh. Especially considering previous bans for other offences, i.e only an 8 game ban for Ben Thatcher almost killing Pedro Mendes, and Defoe only getting a yellow card and nothing else for biting Mascherano


Not sure if this is why but Defoe probably got nothing after the game because the ref had dealt with if by giving him a yellow card. The same reason the FA gave to not punishing Aguero after the challange on Luiz because the ref had spoke to Aguero
King Luis
17 years ago
2 months ago
3,111
By Tommo. | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:27 PM
Not sure if this is why but Defoe probably got nothing after the game because the ref had dealt with if by giving him a yellow card. The same reason the FA gave to not punishing Aguero after the challange on Luiz because the ref had spoke to Aguero


That rules only recently come in hasn't it? cause after the Bowyer/Dyer fight Bowyer was given an additional 3 match ban, or can you only give an additional ban on top of a red card i guess, either way its a dumb rule when the ref clearly gets it wrong.
rossiheslopi
15 years ago
4 years ago
669
By Tommo. | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:27 PM
Not sure if this is why but Defoe probably got nothing after the game because the ref had dealt with if by giving him a yellow card. The same reason the FA gave to not punishing Aguero after the challange on Luiz because the ref had spoke to Aguero

Fair enough I suppose, but the outcry about Suarez is way more than I ever remember it being for Defoe? I may obviously be wrong but I'd forgotten about the Defoe bite until this came up, can't see this being allowed to be forgotten as easily.
Crane
14 years ago
3 days ago
2,432
Premium
By rossiheslopi | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:45 PM
Fair enough I suppose, but the outcry about Suarez is way more than I ever remember it being for Defoe? I may obviously be wrong but I'd forgotten about the Defoe bite until this came up, can't see this being allowed to be forgotten as easily.


That's because he's an evil human being who deserves never to play football again.
Dutton
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,101
Lmao, butthurt Liverpool fans everywhere.
om4ever
17 years ago
8 years ago
213
By King Luis | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:03 PM
Seems abit excessive, when you consider that Barton got 12 match ban for 3 counts of violent conduct. Ah well, wouldn't surprise me if he was gone in the summer anyway.


It's the second hime in his career he's suspended for that particular offense, 6 the first time, 10 the second, makes sense to me.

Doing it once is already brainless, doing it again is beyond comprehension.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
1 day ago
3,322
So:

Break another player's leg - 3-match ban (assuming you get sent off)

Bite another player - 10-match ban.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
Nice to see the FA not being pussies for once.
Crane
14 years ago
3 days ago
2,432
Premium
By Portaloo | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:54 PM
So:

Break another player's leg - 3-match ban (assuming you get sent off)

Bite another player - 10-match ban.


Racially abuse a player - 8 matches.

The FA are so inconsistent.
The Platypus
13 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Liverpool fans using the Terry RACISM case to defend SUAREZ is fucking classic.
rossiheslopi
15 years ago
4 years ago
669
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
5 months ago
5,082
Premium
By The Platypus | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 16:21 PM
Liverpool fans using the Terry RACISM case to defend SUAREZ is fucking classic.

I liked the calls to boycott the FA Cup, refuse Steven Gerrard to play for England and that they should just leave England and move to Spain.
BR.
17 years ago
2 years ago
1,896
10 games is probably a bit heavy tbh.
Deano
17 years ago
1 month ago
1,380
By King Luis | Permalink | On 24 April 2013 - 15:03 PM
Seems abit excessive, when you consider that Barton got 12 match ban for 3 counts of violent conduct. Ah well, wouldn't surprise me if he was gone in the summer anyway.



Come on... It's a repeat offence ffs.
Shola
16 years ago
5 years ago
2,708
I love the complaining about this being too harsh, while also complaining about other decisions being too lenient are the best.

And the 'FA saying that biting is worse than racism' argument. Absolute morons.

I do feel sorry for the FA in this. Their disciplinary process is designed towards punishing bad tackles. And it will be near impossible to deal with racism, exceptional bad tackles, punches, slaps and violence to referees and fans effectively.
Slashman X
17 years ago
4 months ago
6,000
Premium
FA probably said 10 games as they knew Liverpool would appeal and they'll drop it to 8.
Obtuse
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,338
I really don't think it is enough. I have seen someone mention that breaking a players leg only gets a 3 match ban but that is part and parcel of playing the game as it can happen. What Suarez did was far beyond the game and he should have been punished far more severely for it. FIFA need to step up and uphold this ban and make it stick in all countries.

You'll need to Login to comment