Home
Blog
Careers
Forums
Downloads
FM24 Real Name Fix
FM23 Real Name Fix
FM24 New Leagues
FM23 New Leagues
FM24 Tactics
FM24 Data Update
FM Database
FM Guides
FM Shortlists
FM24/25 Update Wonderkids
FM24/25 Update Free Players
FM24/25 Update Bargains
FM24/25 Update Players to avoid
FM24/25 Update Club Budgets
FM24/25 Update Club Facilities
Graphics
Installation Guides
Records
Prediction League
Fantasy Football
Search
Carroll.
Okay you're actually worse than Liverpool fans and Suarez..
I could maybe let him get away with the Skrtel one as accidental but the Can one was not him 'trodding' on Can, he stamped on him and the intent is clear
VP.
Number 1
When I first got into football it was back in 2001-02 when that was the choice. I got into it after the farce that was the 7pm start with Townsend's Tactics Truck though. But I've heard legendary things about how fucking awful it is. Maybe I liked it because Des Lynam was such a commanding presence as the host.
Maybe its because I wasn't aware of the history or the idea you could have it without adverts, but when it reverted back to Match of the Day in 2004 I was quite thrown for a little while. But now, for all it faults - and I still tend to skip the analysis or zone out during it - it is still a better place.
SpinSwimScream
the slightly older of us will remember Lynam presenting MOTD, always thought he was a great host
K3V0
SpinSwimScream
Number 1
Sure. Though his move from BBC to ITV in 1999 was a bit before my time in football fandom.
Shola
Not sure if Sissoko can be arsed though.
King Luis
Sam
Of course not.
Number 1
Well, tbf, we were aided by Hull's exceptionally wayward passing. But a clinical 3-0 win is still an excellent result and we were - just about - good value for it.
Agreed on Sissoko, although he looked more interested than at least 4 Hull players. They look in trouble.
Bloody hell, fast start - Everton ahead in two minutes, Spurs ahead in five, quite a fair few chances.
Sam
Sam
Nice one.
King Luis
Crane
Number 1
If its Tony Gale it wouldn't surprise me. He's a fucking terrible pundit that seems to be a walking bias factory.
King Luis
Pretty sure it is now you mention it, Someone just tried swapping shirts with Mignolet from a corner and he said there wasn't much in it
K3V0
That goal from Van Persie was pure class, amazing vision and pass from Blind.
bmg033
Sam
Number 1
I was hoping for someone to bring something like the Defour banner. But I think that was probably a bit too much to ask. Shame. Would've been quite something.
Number 1
A type of his name into Twitter revealed dozens of Liverpool fans calling him unbearable.
BR.
What a tool.
Ended 1-1, if any team was going to get the winner it would have been City. Chelsea more than happy to hold on for a point.
K3V0
Embarrassing.
Shedender
Didn't realise he was Chelsea Football Club spokesperson.
.verse
Oh, jog on.
Fact. There is literally no way you, nor I, nor anyone else for that matter, can prove if there was intent by Costa. Unless you have some sort of expansive ability to tap into the thought process of Diego Costa during that exact moment, there is, and always will, remain doubt. He's being judged on what we all saw, which was him chasing down a ball, one he was clearly fixed on, and didn't once take his eyes from his objective (the ball) to locate Can's position before planting his foot. His "reputation" certainly was used to portray the incident in a much different light to what actually unfolded. If you didn't see the incident and purely read what was written, you'd have thought he lined Can up and furiously landed a curb stomp of some sort. As the old adjective goes; innocent until proven guilty. No one can without a shadow of a doubt say the incident occurred with 100% intent. Period. A position backed by a number of ex-players; including Henry, G. Neville and Scholes.
Skrtel was even lucky to be on the pitch himself with his clear elbow on Costa in the first leg. Costa cops a lot of treatment from defenders, more than what most strikers receive, and he's yet to literally snap. He'll push the boundaries and give what he gets back, but it's important to remember that he's not some thug. It might be hard to believe, but Ronaldo has more red cards than Costa.
But we both know all the above means little to you. And with that, I've got nothing further to add.
Edit: spelling
.verse
Carroll.
The first one is clear as daylight no matter how you try to justify it
Crane
Seems like Mou has got all you idiots believing there is some FA conspiracy against you.
Not some thug? Fuck right off.