Hibee
17 years ago
3 years ago
588
By duckeggmoon | Permalink | On 17 December 2012 - 15:10 PM
The club formally backed Safe Standing today.

Teckle news.


Did you see the leaflet/email/thing about them looking to extend the third tier so it goes behind the goals taking the capacity close to 60k? Bad news is their also looking to expand the premium seating areas.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Yeah, I did. They unveiled the plans with fairly comprehensive survey about the expansion and subsequent pricing. Bit depressing but somewhat inevitable. Still if they convert the South Stand or North Stand to Safe Standing and bring the prices down in accordance, that would soften the blow.

I'd also expect to see the stadium expanded further a few years down the line after this expansion happens. The owner's seem to have massive plans for the area around the stadium.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
1 day ago
5,082
Premium
By duckeggmoon | Permalink | On 18 December 2012 - 09:48 AM
Fuck you, Callum. Fuck you.

He's not that bad, but I think he's way overrated. I always find his jokes on WILTY a bit hit-and-miss and pretty cheap, and Not Going Out is one of the worst television shows I've ever seen. It's the closest thing to When The Whistle Blows from Extras that actually exists in reality. The writing is shite, the story is bland and the jokes are just cheap witticisms that come across as lazy.

David Mitchell dicks all over him.
Justicar
17 years ago
3 weeks ago
549
Premium
By duckeggmoon | Permalink | On 18 December 2012 - 19:21 PM
Yeah, I did. They unveiled the plans with fairly comprehensive survey about the expansion and subsequent pricing. Bit depressing but somewhat inevitable. Still if they convert the South Stand or North Stand to Safe Standing and bring the prices down in accordance, that would soften the blow.

I'd also expect to see the stadium expanded further a few years down the line after this expansion happens. The owner's seem to have massive plans for the area around the stadium.


On a space by space basis safe standing offers, in theory, a 100% increase. Although in reality it is probably more like 80%. If they charge you the original seating price then they are ripping you off to be honest. But the installation has to be paid for I guess.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Exactly.

I'm assuming there would be price drop for the standing areas but I'm not trying not to get my hopes up.

Also, it could be BS but, apparently City have approached the FA with an offer to trail Safe Standing.
Justicar
17 years ago
3 weeks ago
549
Premium
It works in the Bundesliga, no reason why it shouldn't work in the Prem. The German ones are less "safe" than the proposed Safe Standing ones anyway.

http://www.the92.net/news-blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/DSCF0125.jpg

Bristol City are one of the teams behind it also. We already have an unreserved stand and most people stand in it anyway, but that makes it unsafe. The rails would make the inevitable (i.e. standing at football) much safer. No brainer IMO.

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kyzlj1cTqe1qb9w56o1_500.jpg
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
What the fuck are City going to do with a 60k stadium?
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Fill it presumably. We've been selling out a 47k stadium for a few years now; seems unlikely our attendances are going to decrease any time soon.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
Pull the other one.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
We wouldn't do it immediately but it's not that ridiculous a statement. Demand already outstrips supply for most games and our fan-base is growing quickly.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
Not like City to tell fibs about selling the stadium out.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
No more than any other club.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
The Etihad is never full, except when we come play there.

I don't see the point of expanding much beyond 60k, we just about manage to pull in 75k, but we've also completely destroyed the season ticket waiting list (ok, thats more to do with the Glazer's abhorrent ACS scheme, a recession and price increases) and further diluted any atmosphere.

Even then, I'd wait until you actually need to. Demand will obviously increase, (and I can't wait for the bluemoon rants about the Chinese people with cameras) but until you have probably 65,000 people that want to come on any given saturday I can't see how it's going to help, really.
Flash.
17 years ago
11 months ago
677
Premium
Why wait for the demand to hit then have to wait 2 years until you plan and construct the expansions?

If you know demands coming you may as well start now.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Flash. | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 01:30 AM
Why wait for the demand to hit then have to wait 2 years until you plan and construct the expansions?

If you know demands coming you may as well start now.

Because until the point where they actually need a bigger stadium they're just paying to have more empty blue seats. Would kill whats left of the atmosphere, drive down ticket prices and, for all you know, the demand would never actually materialise. From a business point of view it's a stupid idea, and if City are committed to being run sensibly from now on (as they claim they are) then they need to start taking decisions from that point of view.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Stupid as ever, Ninja.
Flash.
17 years ago
11 months ago
677
Premium
By Ninja | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 02:33 AM
Because until the point where they actually need a bigger stadium they're just paying to have more empty blue seats. Would kill whats left of the atmosphere, drive down ticket prices and, for all you know, the demand would never actually materialise. From a business point of view it's a stupid idea, and if City are committed to being run sensibly from now on (as they claim they are) then they need to start taking decisions from that point of view.


They've had an average attendance of 47k for a few years now, that's near enough the full stadium.
Fantastic
13 years ago
1 month ago
2,496
Banned
It is extremely dumb to think Man City will never have enough demand to fill 60,000.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
By Flash. | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 08:55 AM
They've had an average attendance of 47k for a few years now, that's near enough the full stadium.

By Fantastic | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 08:55 AM
It is extremely dumb to think Man City will never have enough demand to fill 60,000.

Both these things.

For the record, the Etihad's capacity is 47,405 and we've been regularly selling it out for the last few years.
K3V0
16 years ago
1 year ago
5,966
By duckeggmoon | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 19:08 PM
Both these things.

For the record, the Etihad's capacity is 47,405 and we've been regularly selling it out for the last few years.


And if you continue to compete at the top of the Premier League and improve in Europe (unlikely) then your attendances will actually increase.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Seriously, the Republik of Mancunia? Are we setting the bar that low?

Anyway, I'm not saying we always have full-houses now (we don't always) but we have consistently sold out for the past two seasons and demand is rising. Expansion makes sense, especially when it's going to take at least a couple of years to come to fruition.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
Doesn't matter where it's from, that's just what came up when I googled.

City said it was a sell out, clearly loads didn't turn up and that's not exactly a one-off, European and cup games are especially bad.

Just because the 'official' figures show that City have averaged 47k, doesn't mean they actually have.
bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
Again, I'm not saying we always get the full-house in attendance but in the league we consistently sell-out. From a financial stand-point, sales are more important than attendance.

Besides, there aren't many clubs that aren't struggling to get full-houses in the cup competitions. Even United with their 600bn fans have struggled to fill Old Trafford for Carling Cup games and some of the European games.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Flash. | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 08:55 AM
They've had an average attendance of 47k for a few years now, that's near enough the full stadium.

Bullshit they have.

Anyone that thinks City regularly have 47k people are probably stupid enough to believe that we had over 70k turn up against Cluj when the Stadium was half empty, after all, that was the official attendance.

City will need a 60k seater stadium seater eventually, but until that demand is there it makes absolutely no sense to do anything more than make plans. Otherwise its just wasting money.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
1 day ago
5,082
Premium
By Ninja | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 20:18 PM
Bullshit they have.

Anyone that thinks City regularly have 47k people are probably stupid enough to believe that we had over 70k turn up against Cluj when the Stadium was half empty, after all, that was the official attendance.

City will need a 60k seater stadium seater eventually, but until that demand is there it makes absolutely no sense to do anything more than make plans. Otherwise its just wasting money.

Do you not think any plans to expand the stadium will have been carefully examined and assessed by a number of well-educated experts at City before any final decision is made? No offence, but I'm sure there's been plenty of thought regarding an expansion from people far more educated than some bloke on the internet.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 19 December 2012 - 20:23 PM
Do you not think any plans to expand the stadium will have been carefully examined and assessed by a number of well-educated experts at City before any final decision is made? No offence, but I'm sure there's been plenty of thought regarding an expansion from people far more educated than some bloke on the internet.

I think it's part of the plan to bump start City as a major club by a heavy investment in infrastructure. I think it's a move they'll make regardless of demand but not one that a club would make unless it was part of that plan.

I don't think it's a simple case of 'we need more space because we have too many fans to fit in the current stadium', cynically I would suggest it's part of a plan to use creative official attendance figures to increase match day revenue and channel money into the club through means which are FFP approved because there's no way City will regularly fill a 60k seater stadium for at least 3 or 4 more seasons (and arguably more than that).
Obtuse
15 years ago
3 years ago
1,338
United fans don't have a leg to stand on about stadiums not being full anymore.

You'll need to Login to comment