Win a copy of FM24 in our Prediction League. Prizes are given out to the best predictor each month, so you have multiple chances to win.


bluemoon.
17 years ago
3 months ago
2,411
Premium
You're all idiots.
Phoenix Arrow
15 years ago
1 year ago
825
By duckeggmoon | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:16 PM
You're all idiots.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
By Ninja | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:15 PM
Except that we established at the start of this argument that Always the Victims doesn't fit.

I can't see how you can't understand why we would want to point out that a song very commonly heard at Old Trafford is not about Hillsborough. no ones said that it's not badly timed, no ones said that it's ridiculous to interpret it that way all that's being said is that the offense that Liverpool fans are taking from the song is misplaced.

IF I'M BEING AWKWARD THEN SO ARE YOU FOR CONSISTENTLY IGNORING THIS POINT.


You're contradicting yourself. You agree that you could interpret that song as having references to Hillsborough and that singing that song on that day was bad? THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Abbott | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:34 PM
You're contradicting yourself. You agree that you could interpret that song as having references to Hillsborough and that singing that song on that day was bad? THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT.

It's not a contradiction in the slightest.

I'm saying you could do it, I could see why you'd do it. But you're wrong to do it.

You can interpret it however you want, it doesn't stop that interpretation being wrong.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
Hardly wrong to do interpret something like that on a day like this in the way it was.

But this is getting boring, just move on with it seeing both sides have different views on it.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
By Ninja | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:39 PM
It's not a contradiction in the slightest.

I'm saying you could do it, I could see why you'd do it. But you're wrong to do it.

You can interpret it however you want, it doesn't stop that interpretation being wrong.


Right, this is my last post on this because if you don't agree with me then you're clearly being deliberately stubborn and obtuse.

You are telling me there is absolutely no way somebody can be offended by what was sung? You're saying there is categorically no way that somebody can attribute that song to being as about Hillsborough? Absolute zero way you could interpret it that way? Because if you can then the interpretation is not wrong, and being offended by it isn't wrong. You even say it here:

By Ninja | Permalink | On 27 September 2012 - 14:23 PM
Nah it clearly is a reference to the self pity City myth and the perceived victim mentality that Liverpool fans have. It's clearly a reference to conspiracy theories, Rafa's facts and yes at it's grubbier ends of that reputation Heysel and, formerly Hillsborough admittedly.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
16 hours ago
5,082
Premium
I'm with Abbott on this one, and I barely ever take a pro-Liverpool stance. Singing those chants on that day is so obviously and clearly not appropriate, no matter where the songs stem from.

Some of the blatant tribalism on here is pathetic.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Abbott | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:52 PM
Right, this is my last post on this because if you don't agree with me then you're clearly being deliberately stubborn and obtuse.

You are telling me there is absolutely no way somebody can be offended by what was sung? You're saying there is categorically no way that somebody can attribute that song to being as about Hillsborough? Absolute zero way you could interpret it that way? Because if you can then the interpretation is not wrong, and being offended by it isn't wrong. You even say it here:

No.

I'm saying it's not explicitly a reference to Hillsborough and to be offended by it because you think it is is understandable initially but after being told about 674 times what it actually references still being offended because of the original misinterpretation is stupid.

And you've just proved my point that you're ignoring what I'm actually saying. I said Hillsborough used to feed in to the myth of the self pity city that is referenced in the song, but it's not anymore. If you can't see how other factors have been more important in the development of why Liverpool fans have the reputation of being perennial victims then you are seriously in denial.

Don't get me wrong, NO ONE is saying that it should have been sung at Anfield on Saturday, because the tit for tat hatred of each other was totally unneeded on the day, but I don't see how you can be so outraged by that one incident and completely ignore the fact that your fans also did not drop the hatred and nonsense that comes with our rivalry.

It's too far to say that this holier than thou nonsense is pretty much the exact reason we sing that song, but not by much.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
16 hours ago
5,082
Premium
By Ninja | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 13:05 PM
I'm saying it's not explicitly a reference to Hillsborough and to be offended by it because you think it is is understandable initially but after being told about 674 times what it actually references still being offended because of the original misinterpretation is stupid.

Seriously? Do you really think that the group of United fans chanting about Liverpool fans always painting themselves as victims, on that particular day, had no idea how that would come across? Even if those chants stem from elsewhere, singing them at Anfield on that day was grossly inappropriate because it is frighteningly obvious how those chants could be interpreted. The fans who chanted that would have known that, anyone who heard that would have known that, and even you know that - unless you really are this tribalistic and ignorant, and truly believe that those chants were acceptable because they don't directly reference Hillsborough. Pathetic.
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
Shouldn't have been sung - end of - because it could be interpreted wrongly. My problem is the media/Liverpool fans going with the line "United fans sing about Hillsborough", which inaccurately gives the impression that every United fan there that day was mocking the people that died.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
16 hours ago
5,082
Premium
By tmatthew | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 13:17 PM
Shouldn't have been sung - end of - because it could be interpreted wrongly. My problem is the media/Liverpool fans going with the line "United fans sing about Hillsborough", which inaccurately gives the impression that every United fan there that day was mocking the people that died.

Yeah, that's fair enough. All I'm trying to argue that it was foolish for those chants to have been made given the circumstances surrounding that game.
tmatthew
17 years ago
5 months ago
771
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Telegram Sam | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 13:12 PM
Seriously? Do you really think that the group of United fans chanting about Liverpool fans always painting themselves as victims, on that particular day, had no idea how that would come across? Even if those chants stem from elsewhere, singing them at Anfield on that day was grossly inappropriate because it is frighteningly obvious how those chants could be interpreted. The fans who chanted that would have known that, anyone who heard that would have known that, and even you know that - unless you really are this tribalistic and ignorant, and truly believe that those chants were acceptable because they don't directly reference Hillsborough. Pathetic.

Is reading literacy at an all time low on this forum?

No one is saying that it should have been sung, I've said it so many times that I'm physically sick of typing the phrase.

All we're saying is that it, no matter what you want to think, does not reference anything other than the self pity city myth.

I also genuinely think you're giving far too much credit to the thinking that went into signing it, I don't think there was any. I don't think anyone went there expecting to sing that song.

What almost certainly happened is that a group of fans from both sides decided to have a bit of 'banter' (but call it what you want, it's probably more sinister than banter) at the others expense knowing that the other side reacting would cause a bit of a shit storm. It started with stuff like 'Where's your famous Munich song?' the booing of Evra and plane gestures and started an inevitable and sad slide down a slippery slope that ended with this song.

No one's saying that it justifies singing a song that was always going to cause trouble, and you would hope provocation would be met by a desire to be the bigger men about it and let it slide, but we all know that football fans capacity for stupidity is not exactly compatible with standing aloof of things like this.

I think people are getting confused by people defending the song itself, with attempting to exonerate the actions of those that sung it last week.
Zog
17 years ago
5 years ago
395
Always a boring argument when Liverpool is involved.
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
By Ninja | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 12:05 PM
Well it's always going to be a circular argument when neither side is going to budge from their position, I don't see how inanely posting gifs is going to help that.


Well this debate is pretty inane given the reasons you have just stated.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
By Zog | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 15:32 PM
Always a boring argument when Liverpool is involved.


Always a boring post when Zog is involved.

Sorry, I'm cranky today
Zog
17 years ago
5 years ago
395
By Abbott | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 15:54 PM
Always a boring post when Zog is involved.

Sorry, I'm cranky today


I'll get over it.

I had no idea what they were arguing about tbh, just had a quick glance at Ninja's long angry post and decided this wasn't for me.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Zog | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 17:08 PM
I'll get over it.

I had no idea what they were arguing about tbh, just had a quick glance at Ninja's long angry post and decided this wasn't for me.

It wasn't that long!

The font size on here just makes a paragraph look like the fucking bible in length.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
4 hours ago
3,323
We need a Liverpool fans V United fans thread.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
Yeah we do seem to have a habit of getting into horribly petty arguments that end up a mile away from where it started. Especially me and Ninja

I blame jumberto. He's the bad egg.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
By Abbott | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 17:27 PM
Yeah we do seem to have a habit of getting into horribly petty arguments that end up a mile away from where it started. Especially me and Ninja

I blame jumberto. He's the bad egg.

Hey that's not nice.

We're like a better, more important version of Rangers vs Celtic.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Abbott | Permalink | On 28 September 2012 - 17:27 PM
Yeah we do seem to have a habit of getting into horribly petty arguments that end up a mile away from where it started. Especially me and Ninja

I blame jumberto. He's the bad egg.

It's because we're both too stubborn to ever admit defeat.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong
VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
Think i started all this too
The Platypus
13 years ago
1 year ago
1,784
Chelsea's starting lineup:

Cech
Ivanovic
Terry
Luiz
Cole
Ramires
Mikel
Hazard
Oscar
Mata
Torres
VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
Starting XI to play Chelsea: Mannone, Jenkinson, Koscielny, Vermaelen, Gibbs, Diaby, Arteta, Cazorla, Ramsey, Gervinho, Podolski.

Subs; Martinez, Santos, Mertesacker, Djourou, Walcott, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Giroud.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
4 hours ago
3,323
Hazard, Oscar and Mata?

Not cool man.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
16 hours ago
5,082
Premium
I forget how much I despise Chelsea until we actually play them.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
4 hours ago
3,323
Argh, Mannone should have done much better with his near post.

Deserved lead anyway, they've clearly been the dominant side.

You'll need to Login to comment