mons - Comments

And what on earth does that have to do with the fact that you requested the same photo 3 times in a month, and again a couple of a days ago??

@ebacaksiz3, for future reference, when you have a lot of images to upload, then you should upload them as a pack instead of individually and save the both of us some time.

You can also upload up to 50 images per pack instead of just a maximum of 3 when done individually.

@Aberdonian, for future reference, when you have a lot of images to upload, then you should upload them as a pack instead of individually and save the both of us some time.

You can also upload up to 50 images per pack instead of just a maximum of 3 when done individually.

If you'd paid attention, you would have noticed that the original request had not been rejected, just the other 2 of the exact same photo. We don't need to have the same photo requested more than once 😕

Can I see the editor data folder? I'd like to see its full path, too.

Can you show me all 4 in your screenshot? I'm seeing only the Club Name Changes, Bookmakers and Brazilian kit changes files in the screenshot.

If you're running both the Ajax staff file from this download and that from the FMEditor fix, then that'll be the reason why you have the Ajax staff duplicated, because you have two files doing the same thing…

@Jão Facemaker, can you provide me with the URLs of the original sources for all these images? A big chunk of them look like they have been enhanced or create with AI tools, which as we've already discussed is a no-no.

Which part of my post did you not understand? What's wrong with you??

The default database has the correct Brazilian club names. For licensing purposes, SI add a file (I forget which one it is) that adds the fake names. This fix works by simply removing that file. This fix doesn't actually edit the names at all.

I'm not sure I understand the question. It's not ideal, true, but I thought it could replace the previous cut from the EURO 24 pack.

You're not using the fix from this download, but that from FMEditor. Best direct your query to them 👍

Can I have a screenshot of your editor data folder?

@OKV, please make sure to use the upload multiple function next time.

I'll only help with this query if you acknowledge the previous instances that I gave you feedback on your cuts, that you received a notification about, and which you ignored.

I reiterate that:

As you're still starting out, instead of delving straight into packs with the ensuing risk that any issues in your cutting technique are repeated in multiple images, I suggest posting a source and your cut from it in this thread for our feedback

@yakion @yakioon, you don't need 2 accounts. Choose 1, and I'll ban the other. Choose none (or ignore this message), and I'll ban both.

The third one looks fine but the first two are cropped too far from the chin. We want the player's face to fill the canvas for the 250px cutout, which would mean cropping the image along these red lines:

At the same time, we want all cuts to include a little bit of collar. Since in some sources like this one, the person in the image may have a longer neck than usual, this would be quite difficult to achieve naturally.

Here's a video of the process on how to nudge the collar upwards:

@sfnzn The edges aren't very smooth and have a black line alongside the neck. The last two don't seem to have a collar, and the middle one isn't in the centre of the canvas. All 3 of them are cropped too far from the top of the hair; 2-3 pixels is more than enough.

I also specifically asked you to post the source images you're working with. The quality of the cut depends also on the quality of the source. If the source is poor, then the cut will almost certainly be poor and not an improvement if the person already has an image. If the cut is poor, but the source is decent, then it's a question of technique. I urge you to use remove.bg and to have a proper look at the guidelines in the first post.

Too small @shymon84, and please use the upload multiple pack next time.

@yakion, for future reference, when you have a lot of images to upload, then you should upload them as a pack instead of individually and save the both of us some time.

You can also upload up to 50 images per pack instead of just a maximum of 3 when done individually. 

Is this just for FM24, or is it for FM26?

@Tjarold, please use the upload multiple function if you have multiple images to upload 👍

🍻 for these 3

@Sajmy, please avoid uploading sources which have a completed cut already 😕

Image is at least 3 and a half years old. While it could do with being updated, replacing it with such an old source isn't ideal.

Too small to provide an improvement.

@Varp, when you have a lot of images to upload, please remember to upload them as a pack instead of individually and save the both of us some time.

@sfnzn, I've moved your post to this thread. Some things to keep in mind:

Some of your cuts appear to be somewhat blurry as if they were not the best quality sources and needed to be upscaled. In cases like this one, I'm afraid they're not really improvements to what's in the megapack. This one also happens to have a bit of snow, and no collar. Several of the cuts in this pack are also not in the centre of the canvas.

Have a look at the first post in this thread, and make sure to take on board the guidelines and to watch the tutorials. As you're still starting out, instead of delving straight into packs with the ensuing risk that any issues in your cutting technique are repeated in multiple images, I suggest posting a source and your cut from it in this thread for our feedback. Good luck 👍

Then either cut, or wait until such point that you have enough sources to merit uploading them as a pack. Uploading images as comments means they might not be seen by cutters, which defeats the point of the submission system.

Not using Steam Deck myself, I used Google to find me this link: https://www.reddit.com/r/footballmanagergames/comments/1owr47x/does_anybody_know_where_the_fm26_game_files_are/ 

Hope it helps 👍

@ASSE25, start paying more attention to the guidelines. If better sources are available, you should make more of an effort to find and request them.