VP.
13 years ago
1 month ago
25,271
I would say two feet are a lot more aggressive, dangerous and forceful than one. Evans does catch Shelvey on the calf too with the follow through, he just doesn't make any deal of it.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Carroll. | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 07:53 AM
How is what Evans did not on par? Just because he's not caught the player? So it's okay to jump in two footed off the ground if you don't catch the other player now is it?

No, but it doesn't exactly make it just as bad.

Shelvey's tackle is far more wild, far more dangerous and far further over the top than Evans'.

I really don't doubt there's much difference between Van Persie's and Evans' tackles, and Evans almost certainly wouldn't have escaped without a booking without Shelvey's tackle upstaging it almost.

I think in situations like these it's always wise for the referee to deal with the most serious incident primarily, I think it's hard to deny that Shelvey's is the worst of the two tackles made for the ball so the correct decision was to send him off, any additional punishment for Evans' be it a red card, a yellow or no further action should be dealt with as a secondary consideration.

I genuinely think there is only one tackle that we saw yesterday that endangered a player's safety and two that were reckless.
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
By Ninja | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 16:22 PM
No, but it doesn't exactly make it just as bad.

Shelvey's tackle is far more wild, far more dangerous and far further over the top than Evans'.

I really don't doubt there's much difference between Van Persie's and Evans' tackles, and Evans almost certainly wouldn't have escaped without a booking without Shelvey's tackle upstaging it almost.

I think in situations like these it's always wise for the referee to deal with the most serious incident primarily, I think it's hard to deny that Shelvey's is the worst of the two tackles made for the ball so the correct decision was to send him off, any additional punishment for Evans' be it a red card, a yellow or no further action should be dealt with as a secondary consideration.

I genuinely think there is only one tackle that we saw yesterday that endangered a player's safety and two that were reckless.


Erm no. Shelvey is going in one footed, and granted he lunges I'd say that's less dangerous than diving two feet in. Not going to bother explaining further as I already have and each side is going to have a different view.
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Carroll. | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 16:29 PM
Erm no. Shelvey is going in one footed, and granted he lunges I'd say that's less dangerous than diving two feet in. Not going to bother explaining further as I already have and each side is going to have a different view.

I really don't think you can call Evans tackle anymore two footed than Shelvey's watch this:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8178/8015368309_37ab580c42_o.gif

Both players both feet leave the ground, Evans lands his left foot wide of the ball in no danger to Shelvey and Shelvey makes his lunge with his foot coming round eventually in a scissor movement. Neither of the players use the extra foot in any meaningful attempt to win the ball.

I think it's hard to argue with any of these points.
1. Shelvey makes greater contact with Evans than Evans with Shelvey
2. Shelvey throws himself harder into the lunge than Evans
3. Shelvey makes contact with the ball only after Evans kicks it into him
4. Evans' tackle is off the ground, but no higher than the height of the ball. Shelvey comes over the top of it.

If Shelvey had tackled normally I don't think he was posed any great danger by the tackle that Evans had made. That doesn't make Evans tackle a good one, but if he had made a better tackle he still would have been caught half way up the shin by a tackle thats made minimal contact with the ball and that is why Shelvey was the player that walked.
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
The pace that Shelvey went into the tackle with meant he had no control over what was going to happen. It was a red
Carroll.
15 years ago
3 years ago
3,361
By Ninja | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 16:40 PM
I really don't think you can call Evans tackle anymore two footed than Shelvey's watch this:

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8178/8015368309_37ab580c42_o.gif

Both players both feet leave the ground, Evans lands his left foot wide of the ball in no danger to Shelvey and Shelvey makes his lunge with his foot coming round eventually in a scissor movement. Neither of the players use the extra foot in any meaningful attempt to win the ball.

I think it's hard to argue with any of these points.
1. Shelvey makes greater contact with Evans than Evans with Shelvey
2. Shelvey throws himself harder into the lunge than Evans
3. Shelvey makes contact with the ball only after Evans kicks it into him
4. Evans' tackle is off the ground, but no higher than the height of the ball. Shelvey comes over the top of it.

If Shelvey had tackled normally I don't think he was posed any great danger by the tackle that Evans had made. That doesn't make Evans tackle a good one, but if he had made a better tackle he still would have been caught half way up the shin by a tackle thats made minimal contact with the ball and that is why Shelvey was the player that walked.


Fair enough on some of the points, but I'll go on to anwser them.

Seeing Evans is going in two feet side by site, if Shelvey gets to the ball first, both would have landed in Shelvey's leg. So I'd say there's an element of danger there. Shelvey mean while throws him self in, I don't think his intent is to actually win the ball, but block any attempt from Evans, hence he's really spread out and trails a leg to the side.

as for the numbered ones:

1. Yes I agree with that. But I don't think that should affect a situation? If you're lunging into a tackle and someone ducks out the way to save themselves, should you not be sent off for not making contact?

2. I'm not sure he does. He's got more momentum, as he's further from the ball at the start, but I don't think he throws himself in with much excessive force. I think he's aim, as I already said, is to block Evan's from winning the ball.

3. I agree with this one too. However that's because he's got further to get to the ball, hence he's late with his challenge.

4. I guess so, but both players still come in with both feet of the ground. If one walks so does the other for me.
Deano
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,380
If Shelvey would of reacted the same as Evans, he wouldn't of been sent off.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
By Ninja | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 16:40 PM
I really don't think you can call Evans tackle anymore two footed than Shelvey's watch this:


You absolutely can. Evans goes in with two at the ball, Shelvey doesn't.

I'll admit that Shelvey deserved to get sent off, but its ludicrous that Evans didn't get anything for his. That's why I'm annoyed.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
By Deano | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 18:24 PM
If Shelvey would of reacted the same as Evans, he wouldn't of been sent off.


That too.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
It's about time we had some 50/50 decisions go our way at Anfield.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
Van Persie's yesterday wasn't great either. Personally I think a yellow was probably enough but you've seen people sent off for similar, like Gerrard at OT last year (although that one was probably worse).

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8310/8015570343_ebdbf951aa_o.gif
chokosc
14 years ago
1 month ago
1,041
By jumberto | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 18:28 PM
It's about time we had some 50/50 decisions go our way at Anfield.


You had a 50/50 and 99('Pool's way) given to you in one game.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
By Abbott | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 18:39 PM
Van Persie's yesterday wasn't great either. Personally I think a yellow was probably enough but you've seen people sent off for similar, like Gerrard at OT last year (although that one was probably worse).

http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8310/8015570343_ebdbf951aa_o.gif

I think a yellow was fair, the ball was free so it wasn't as dangerous as a head on tackle but like you say, it wasn't great. The people saying it was 'identical to Shelvey's' are idiots.

By chkosc | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 19:45 PM
You had a 50/50 and 99('Pool's way) given to you in one game.

Don't understand that bit?
Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Abbott | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 18:25 PM
You absolutely can. Evans goes in with two at the ball, Shelvey doesn't.

I'll admit that Shelvey deserved to get sent off, but its ludicrous that Evans didn't get anything for his. That's why I'm annoyed.

He clearly doesn't though. Both feet leave the ground and move to the ball, but his left leg is obviously never intended to go anywhere near it, which is why it's planted miles to the left and away from causing any danger to Shelvey.

I am not for a second saying that Evans made a good tackle, it was shit, but I think it was reckless rather than endangering safety which is why he probably should have been booked for it.

I'm also not sure why Deano is acting like Evans feigned injury to get Shelvey sent off, he got a kick half way up his leg at some speed, he was probably acting like it hurt him because it really quite hurt him.
Abbott
17 years ago
8 years ago
383
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A3ewmfqCAAMt58S.jpg

What are you talking about? Shelvey's is not two footed. Evans' is, or at least a lot more two footed than Shelvey's.

But anyway. We'll be back
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
chokosc
14 years ago
1 month ago
1,041
By jumberto | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 20:38 PM
Don't understand that bit?



The penalty was 99% wrong.
Bian
13 years ago
8 years ago
138
By jumberto | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 23:59 PM
http://www.derelictmedia.com.au/images/dealwithit.gif


I just wished he would've given Shelvey a troll face.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
2 days ago
3,323
By Bian | Permalink | On 25 September 2012 - 02:58 AM
I just wished he would've given Shelvey a troll face.

I don't think it would have the desired effect, Bian.
King Luis
17 years ago
3 months ago
3,111
Are people still going on about the red card?! Jesus wept
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
Yeah, like seriously, no one on this forum is going to mention King Kenny's awesome tweets?





Deano
17 years ago
2 months ago
1,380
Aye, he done quite a few, wtf was he chatting?
Slashman X
17 years ago
5 months ago
6,000
Premium
By Deano | Permalink | On 25 September 2012 - 10:16 AM
Aye, he done quite a few, wtf was he chatting?


It's nothing, his daughter was joking earlier on about 'divorcing' her mum, so I'm guessing it's in relation to that.

This one is my favourite:


Ninja
14 years ago
7 years ago
5,341
By Abbott | Permalink | On 24 September 2012 - 23:57 PM
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A3ewmfqCAAMt58S.jpg

What are you talking about? Shelvey's is not two footed. Evans' is, or at least a lot more two footed than Shelvey's.

But anyway. We'll be back

Watch the gif I posted, Evan's left foot is no more a factor in the tackle than Shelvey's is.
Eric Portapotty
15 years ago
2 days ago
3,323
Shelvey's a shit tackler, let's leave it at that and move on with our lives.
Flash.
17 years ago
11 months ago
677
Premium
Referee Mark Halsey has made a complaint to Greater Manchester Police about insulting tweets directed at him.

Tweets sent after Manchester United's 2-1 win at Liverpool on Sunday referred to the 51-year-old's treatment for throat cancer in 2009.

Halsey drew criticism from Reds manager Brendan Rodgers after sending off Jonjo Shelvey for a first-half tackle.

Halsey told BBC Sport: "I can confirm that my family have made a complaint to the police."

He added: "I will be speaking to the police on Wednesday after I have returned from refereeing Southampton v Sheffield Wednesday."

Rodgers was angry after Halsey also awarded Manchester United a late penalty, which Robin van Persie converted.

"We could control our players' performance but what we can't control is decisions by the referee," Rodgers said.

Some Liverpool fans later took to Twitter to criticise Halsey's decisions, making reference to him dying of cancer.

The abuse was condemned by the match officials' organisation, Professional Game Match Officials Limited.


Fucking scum.

After everything that's happened in the last week for Liverpool too.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
Some of the tweets were awful.

One of the abusive messages came from an account named @johnwareing1 and read: "I hope Mark Halsey gets cancer again and dies". Another, from @lfcjohn259, said: "Mark Halsey shouldve died of cancer", before being deleted. Both accounts have since been removed.


Absolute cunts.
Telegram Sam
15 years ago
2 hours ago
5,082
Premium
Aside from the sadistic and horrific nature of what these people are tweeting, I find it even more incredible how they don't have the presence of mind to think of the consequences of saying such disgusting things on a social networking site. How stupid do you have to be to do that?
Bian
13 years ago
8 years ago
138
What assholes some Liverpool fans can be. So you got fucked over by the refs, everyone does at least once, just suck it up and move on.
jumberto
16 years ago
1 month ago
1,111
By Bian | Permalink | On 25 September 2012 - 23:11 PM
What assholes some Liverpool fans can be. So you got fucked over by the refs, everyone does at least once, just suck it up and move on.

He didn't even fuck them over, just looking for someone else to blame for losing. Again.

You'll need to Login to comment